Tailoring the Morphology of WS2 for Efficient Multidisciplinary Applications
(Jin Kim)
1
(Seungyoung Park)
2,*
-
(Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon
34158, Republic of Korea)
-
(School of Electronic Engineering, Kyonggi University, 154-42, Gwanggyosan-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu,
Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 16227, Republic of Korea)
Copyright © The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Keywords
WS2, Photoelectrochemical, Gas sensor, Morphology, Chemical vapor deposition
1. INTRODUCTION
Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have attracted significant
attention as next-generation functional materials owing to their unique electronic
structures, high surface-to-volume ratios, and tunable physicochemical properties[1–6]. Among TMDs, tungsten disulfide (WS2) is considered one of the most promising candidates for multidisciplinary applications,
including photoelectrochemical (PEC) energy conversion, optoelectronics, catalysis,
and gas sensing, due to its suitable bandgap, excellent chemical stability, and strong
light–matter interaction[7–10]. The performance of WS2 for practical device applications, however, is strongly governed not only by its
intrinsic electronic structure but also by its nanoscale morphology. In particular,
vertical nanosheet architectures have emerged as an effective strategy to enhance
functional performance, as they provide enlarged active surface areas, abundant edge
sites, and shortened charge transport pathways[10–12]. These advantages are beneficial for both PEC reactions, which require efficient
charge separation and transport, and gas sensing, which relies on surface adsorption
and rapid charge transfer between gas molecules and sensing materials. Notwithstanding
extensive research on WS2, most previous studies have focused on optimizing WS2 for a single application, such as PEC water splitting or gas sensing. Optimization
based on a single function limits the expandability of WS2 across diverse application fields. Moreover, although vertical WS2 nanosheets are known to be advantageous, systematic strategies to optimize their
structural parameters, such as density and thickness, for multifunctional applications
have not been sufficiently explored.
Herein, we report a simple yet effective morphology engineering strategy to realize
high-performance multifunctional WS2 using a controllable metal–organic chemical vapor deposition process. By precisely
modulating the growth pressure, we are able to systematically tune the vertical nanosheet
density and thickness of WS2 films. The morphology-engineered WS2 electrodes are then evaluated in both PEC and NO2 gas sensing systems. We demonstrate that an optimized WS2 nanosheet architecture simultaneously enhances PEC photocurrent generation and the
gas sensing response. Whereas previous studies have largely focused on optimizing
vertically aligned WS2 for a single functional application, such as PEC water splitting or gas sensing,
the present work systematically correlates pressure-controlled morphology parameters
with performance across two distinct application platforms. By identifying a common
optimized nanosheet architecture that simultaneously enhances PEC and gas sensing
characteristics, we highlight morphology engineering as a multifunctional design strategy
rather than a single-purpose optimization approach. This work highlights morphology
control as a universal design principle for extending the applicability of a limited
range of TMD materials to diverse technological fields.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1. Materials Fabrication
WS2 was grown onto a FTO substrate via metal–organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD).
W(CO)6 and H2S gas (5 vol.% in N2) served as the W and S precursors, respectively. W(CO)6 was vaporized at 20 °C and transported to the reaction zone by Ar carrier gas at
a flow rate of 100 standard cubic centimeters per minute (SCCM), and the H2S flow rate was maintained at 300 SCCM throughout the process. The WS2 growth was carried out at a fixed temperature of 400 °C and time of 30 min, while
varying the growth pressure (1, 3, 5, and 10 torr).
2.2. Material Characterization
The morphology of the fabricated photoelectrodes was analyzed using field-emission
scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4800). Structural properties were investigated
through micro-Raman spectroscopy (UniThink Inc., UR1207J). The photoelectrochemical
(PEC) performance of the samples was assessed using a three-electrode electrochemical
workstation (potentiostat/galvanostat, 263A). A saturated calomel electrode (Hg/Hg2Cl2) and a platinum (Pt) wire were employed as the reference and counter electrodes,
respectively. To define the active electrode area, all regions except for a 0.5 ×
0.5 cm2 section were masked with epoxy to prevent contact with the electrolyte. A 0.5 M aqueous
sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) solution was used as the electrolyte and a solar simulator (PEC-L01, Peccell Technology)
provided illumination. Alumina substrates patterned with interdigitated comb type
gold electrodes were used to fabricate WS2 based gas sensors. The NO2 gas sensing performance was evaluated by monitoring the real time resistance of the
sensors using a pico-ammeter/voltage source (Keithley 6487) within a customized detecting
system similar to reported previously systems[13]. The sensor response was defined as response = Ra/Rg when the sensor resistance decreased upon exposure to the target gas. Here, Ra and Rg denote the sensor resistance in dry air and in a mixture of the target gas and dry
air, respectively.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1 presents cross-sectional SEM images of WS2 grown on FTO substrates under different growth pressures that highlight the evolution
of the nanosheet morphology. The insets provide corresponding top view SEM images
for comparison. As shown in the cross-sectional and planar SEM images in Figure 1(a), WS2 grown at 400 °C under a pressure of 1 torr (hereafter denoted as WS2-1torr) exhibits a sharp vertically oriented nanosheet morphology on the substrate.
The average lateral size and thickness of the WS2 nanosheets are both in a range of approximately 220 to 250 nm. When the growth pressure
is increased to 3 torr (referred to as WS2-3torr in Figure 1(b)), vertically aligned WS2 nanosheets with uniform thickness and high density are formed. This results in a
well interconnected network structure with nanosheets reaching sizes in a range of
400–480nm. With a further increase in growth pressure to 5 torr (referred to as WS2-5torr in Figure 1(c)), the vertical WS2 nanosheets continue to grow and become excessively thick and densely packed, with
sizes reaching approximately 600 to 750 nm. Upon further increasing the growth pressure
to 10 torr (denoted as WS2-10torr in Figure 1(d)), the WS2 film exhibits a nanosheet structure with a thickness comparable to that of WS2-1torr but with a significantly denser arrangement. This is attributed to the competitive
effects of vertical growth on the substrate and direct gas phase reactions during
WS2 formation under higher pressure conditions. The morphological evolution of WS2 is primarily governed by the growth pressure, which modulates the supersaturation
level within the MOCVD chamber. At an elevated pressure of 10 torr, the increased
partial pressure of precursors leads to high supersaturation, which favors nucleation
over individual crystal growth. This results in a high density of initial nuclei that
rapidly intersect and promotes vertical stacking and polycrystalline formation rather
than lateral expansion. Consequently, the WS2 films grown at higher pressures exhibit increased thickness and a dense nanosheet
architecture. In contrast, lower pressure (1 torr) reduces the supersaturation level
and thereby shifts the growth mode toward lateral expansion where atoms are systematically
incorporated into existing nuclei. This leads to the formation of larger WS2 domains with reduced density. These results demonstrate that precise pressure control
is an effective strategy for engineering WS2 morphology to realize a transition from planar layers to dense, vertical nanosheet
structures.
Fig. 1. SEM images of WS2 synthesized on FTO substrate at various growth pressure: (a) 1 torr, (b) 3 torr,
(c) 5 torr, and (d) 10 torr.
Figure 2(a) presents the Raman spectra of the WS2 nanosheets with various growth pressures. Irrespective of the growth pressure, all
WS2 samples exhibit two distinct peaks at 355.1 and 419.4 cm−1, which are respectively assigned to the E1
2g and A1g phonon modes of 2H-WS2
[14]. The E1
2g mode originates from the in-plane vibrational motion of W and S atoms, whereas the
A1g mode arises from the out-of-plane vibration of S atoms[10,
15], confirming the successful formation of WS2 under all growth conditions. For detailed chemical identification, the W 4f and S
2p core-level spectra of the WS2 nanosheets grown at 3 torr (WS2-3torr) were examined by XPS, as shown in Figures 2(b) and (c). The deconvoluted W 4f spectrum in Figure 2(b) displays characteristic W 4f7/2, W 4f5/2, and W 5p3/2 peaks centered at 33.0, 35.2, and 38.55 eV, respectively, which are consistent with
WS2
[10]. A weak feature at 36.6 eV is attributed to WO3 and indicates minor surface oxidation that is likely caused by exposure to ambient
air during sample transfer[16]. The S 2p spectrum in Figure 2(c) exhibits two distinct peaks at 162.7 and 163.95 eV, corresponding to the S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 states of WS2
[10]. These results confirm the formation of stoichiometric WS2 with negligible oxide related impurities.
Fig. 2. (a) Raman spectra of various WS2 samples (WS2-1torr, WS2-3torr, WS2-5torr, and WS2-10torr). XPS spectra of (b) W 4f, and (c) S 2p core levels for WS2-3torr sample.
The PEC activities of various WS2 photoelectrodes (WS2-1torr, WS2-3torr, WS2-5torr, and WS2-10torr) were evaluated by linear sweep voltammetry under dark conditions and simulated
AM 1.5G illumination. Figure 3(a) presents the photocurrent density−potential (J−V) curves obtained under simulated
solar irradiation. All WS2 samples exhibited clear photoresponses with onset potentials of approximately 0.3
V, irrespective of the growth conditions. In contrast, the dark current gradually
increased from around 0.5 V, with no pronounced differences among the samples (Figure 3(b)). This increase in dark current is likely attributable to electrocorrosion of the
TMD materials[17,
18]. In contrast to the dark current, which showed similar behavior across all growth
conditions, the PEC photocurrent performance was strongly influenced by the morphology
of WS2. Figure 3(c) summarizes the maximum photocurrent densities of each sample. The WS2-3torr sample exhibited a marked increase in photocurrent compared to WS2-1torr and delivered the highest PEC performance, reaching 2.94 mA cm–2 at 0.8 V. However, increasing the growth pressure further to 5 torr and 10 torr,
corresponding to WS2-5torr and WS2-10torr, did not enhance the PEC performance and instead led to deteriorated performance
relative to WS2-3torr. This behavior can be attributed to the following factors. First, small nanosheets
exhibit relatively limited PEC photocurrent because their specific surface area is
not sufficiently enhanced. Second, large and excessively packed vertical nanosheets
can hinder carrier diffusion and reduce the exposure of active sites due to strong
overlap between neighboring sheets, leading to degraded PEC activity[11,
19]. These results indicate that WS2-3torr, which consists of vertically aligned nanosheets with optimized size and density,
delivers the best PEC photocurrent performance. Its optimized morphology provides
a balanced structural configuration in which the nanosheet thickness remains comparable
to or shorter than the effective carrier diffusion length and thereby suppresses bulk
recombination. Simultaneously, the increased edge exposure and interconnected vertical
pathways enhance interfacial charge transfer kinetics at the electrolyte interface
and contribute to the improved photocurrent response.
Fig. 3. (a) Photocurrent density-potential curves, (b) dark current density-potential
curves, and (c) highest photocurrent densities of PEC cells with various WS2 working electrodes (WS2-1torr, WS2-3torr, WS2-5torr, and WS2-10torr).
To assess the multifunctional applicability of WS2 with controlled morphology, the samples were further evaluated as NO2 gas sensors. WS2 nanosheets were grown on Al2O3 substrates patterned with interdigitated Au electrodes under identical pressure conditions.
SEM images in Figures 4(a)–(d) reveal morphological trends similar to those observed on FTO substrates and confirm
that the morphology of WS2 can be controlled independently of the substrate. Figure 4(e) shows the Raman spectra of WS2 synthesized at different pressures on Al2O3 substrates. All samples exhibit the characteristic E1
2g and A1g modes of WS2
[11,
14], indicating that the structure of WS2 is preserved regardless of the substrate. The NO2 gas sensing performance was evaluated at 30 °C under 100 ppm NO2, and the corresponding dynamic response curves are presented in Figure 4(f). Among all samples, the WS2-3torr sensor demonstrates the highest response (Ra/Rg) and the fastest response speed. The WS2-1torr sensor shows a relatively weak response due to an insufficient density of active
adsorption sites. The superior sensing performance of WS2-3torr is attributed to its high density of accessible edge sites and large effective
surface area, which promote efficient NO2 adsorption and rapid charge transfer at the WS2–gas interface[20-22]. As an oxidizing gas, NO2 acts as an electron acceptor and withdraws electrons from the n-type WS2 surface upon adsorption, leading to modulation of the depletion layer and a corresponding
change in resistance. Therefore, an increased density of exposed edge sites promotes
stronger gas adsorption and more pronounced charge transfer and accordingly results
in enhanced sensing response. Meanwhile, the WS2-5torr and WS2-10torr sensors exhibit degraded sensitivity, which is ascribed to hindered gas diffusion
and limited utilization of inner active sites within overly compact nanosheet networks.
Notably, both PEC and gas sensing performance exhibit the same dependence on the WS2 morphology, with the WS2-3torr sample consistently outperforming the other samples. This suggests that efficient
charge transport and an enlarged active surface area are common requirements for both
photoelectrochemical and gas sensing processes. Consequently, the optimized vertical
WS2 nanosheet architecture provides a versatile structural platform that simultaneously
enhances light-driven electrochemical reactions and gas solid interfacial charge transfer.
Fig. 4. SEM images of WS2 synthesized on Al2O3 substrate at various growth pressure: (a) 1 torr, (b) 3 torr, (c) 5 torr, and (d)
10 torr. (e) Raman spectra and (f) Response curves to 100 ppm NO2 of various WS2 sample (WS2-1torr, WS2-3torr, WS2-5torr, and WS2-10 torr).
4. CONCLUSIONS
In summary, we demonstrated a morphology engineering strategy to realize multifunctional
WS2 for both PEC energy conversion and NO2 gas sensing applications. By modulating the growth pressure during the MOCVD process,
the density and thickness of vertical WS2 nanosheets were precisely controlled. Among the fabricated samples, WS2 grown at 3 torr exhibited an optimized nanosheet architecture that resulted in the
highest PEC photocurrent density and superior gas sensing performance. The enhanced
dual functionality arises from the combined effects of increased surface area, abundant
exposed edge sites, and improved charge transport pathways provided by the optimized
vertical nanosheet structure. This study suggests morphology control as a universal
and effective design principle for broadening the applicability of WS2 and other TMD materials across diverse technological fields.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute
of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government.
(No. RS-2024-00394769).
REFERENCES
Park H.G., Lee J.H., Heo K., Korean J. Met. Mater., 62, 154 (2024)

Seo D. B., Kim M. S., Trung T. N., Kim E. T., Electrochim. Acta, 364, 137164 (2020)

Lee D. H., Dongquoc V., Hong S., Kim S. I., Kim E., Cho S., Oh C. H., Je Y., Kwon
M. J., Vo A. H., Seo D. B., Lee J. H., Kim S., Kim E. T., Park J. H., Small, 18, 2202912
(2022)

Son M., Jang H., Seo D. B., Lee J. H., Kim J., Kim M., Kang S., Yim S., Song W., Yoo
J. W., Kim H. Y., Lee S. S., An K. S., Adv. Funct. Mater., 34, 2308906 (2024)

Park O., Kim T., Lee S.W., Kim H.S., Shin W.H., Rahman J.U., Kim S., Korean J. Met.
Mater., 60, 315 (2022)

Seo D. B., Kim D., Kim M. R., Kwon J., Kook H. J., Kang S., Yim S., Lee S. S., Shin
D. O., An K. S., Park S., Nano-Micro Lett., 17, 224 (2025)

Rawat A., Jena N., Sarkar A. D., J. Mater. Chem. A, 6, 8693 (2018)

Mahler B., Hoepfner V., Liao K., Ozin G. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 14121 (2014)

Moumen A., Konar R., Zappa D., Teblum E., Nessim G. D., Comini E., Sens. Actuator
B-Chem., 406, 135379 (2024)

Seo D. B., Kwon Y. M., Kim J., Kang S., Yim S., Lee S. S., Kim E. T., Song W., An
K. S., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 16, 28613 (2024)

Seo D. B., Kim J., Jo Y. M., Kim D. I., Lim T. G., Kang S., Yim S., Lee S. S., Kim
E. T., An K. S., Energy Environ. Mater., 8, e70055 (2025)

He H., Lin J., Fu W., Wang X., Wang H., Zeng Q., Gu Q., Li Y., Yan C., Tay B. K.,
Xue C., Hu X., Pantelides S. T., Zhou W., Liu Z., Adv. Energy Mater., 6, 1600464 (2016)

Hung N. M., Nguyen C. V., Arepalli V. K., Kim J., Chinh N. D., Nguyen T. D., Seo D.
B., Kim E. T., Kim C., Kim D., Sensors, 20, 5701 (2020)

Lai G. J., Lyu L. M., Huang Y. S., Lee G. C., Lu M. P., Perng T. P., Lu M. Y., Chen
L. J., Nano Energy, 81, 105608 (2021)

Park S. Y., Seo D. B., Choi H., Lee J. H., Lee D. H., Kim J., Kang S., Yim S., Kim
E. T., Lee S. S., Yoon D. H., Kim H. Y., Song W., An K. S., Adv. Funct. Mater., 34,
2310178 (2024)

Kim S. K., Song W., Ji S., Lim Y. R., Lee Y. B., Myung S., Lim J., An K. S., Lee S.
S., Appl. Surf. Sci., 425, 241 (2017)

Trung T. N., Seo D. B., Quang N. D., Kim D., Kim E. T., Electrochim. Acta, 260, 150
(2018)

Chang K., Mei Z., Wang T., Kang Q., Ouyang S., Ye J., ACS Nano, 8, 7078 (2014)

Liu C., Wang L., Tang Y., Luo S., Liu Y., Zhang S., Zeng Y., Xu Y., Appl. Catal. B-Environ.,
164, 1 (2015)

Bisht P., Kumar A., Ghosh A., Vullum P. E., Sunding M. F., Belle B. D., Mehta B. R.,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 14, 36789 (2022)

Heo S. G., Kim S., Seo S. J., Sim J. J., Shin J., Mirzaei A., Choi M. S., Korean J.
Met. Mater., 62, 631 (2024)

Park J., Shin J., Mirzaei A., Roh J. W., Wang Q., Choi S. W., Jin C., Choi M. S.,
Korean J. Met. Mater., 63, 594 (2025)
