High Temperature Compressive Deformation Behavior of Laser Powder Bed Fusion AlSi10Mg
Alloy under Different Heat Treatment Conditions
(R Kreethi)
1
(So-Yeon Park)
1
(Soobin Kim)
1
(Kee-Ahn Lee)
1,*
-
(Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, 22212,
Republic of Korea)
Copyright © The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Keywords
AlSi10Mg alloy, Laser powder bed fusion, High temperature compression, Heat treatment, Flow behavior
1. INTRODUCTION
Aluminum (Al) and its alloys provide benefits of light weight, high strength, corrosion
resistance, and good weldability and are consequently widely used in diverse applications
in the automotive, aerospace, machinery, and aeronautical industries[1,
2]. Among Al alloys, AlSi10Mg outperforms other cast Al alloys in terms of hardness,
tensile strength, corrosion resistance, excellent wear resistance, high specific strength,
and ductility[3-12]. When the AlSi10Mg alloy is used in additive manufacturing, the laser powder bed
fusion (L-PBF) process is highly suitable, as an alternative to traditional methods[13]. L-PBF is a layer-by-layer additive manufacturing technique that can form parts with
complex geometries, and provides considerable flexibility in shaping, and high material
usage efficiency. For these reasons it has attracted great interest in many industrial
applications that require near-net shape manufacturing of lightweight components.
The process enables the formation of unique and fine microstructures that enhance
the strength of the material, which are typically lacking in traditional methods[14-18].
As a result, in recent years many engineering industries have developed post-processing
procedures suitable for L-PBF AlSi10Mg alloys[19,
20]. These methods primarily involve a complex heat treatment process that includes stress
relief, sample removal, solution treatment, and artificial aging[19,
20]. Recently, numerous investigations have reported that, when using L-PBF built Al
alloy, microstructural variations and mechanical properties can be finely controlled
by using appropriate heat treatment within a wide range. This makes it possible to
meet specific requirements such as T6, i.e., solution heat treatment plus precipitation
hardening. Direct aging has also been introduced, in which heat treatment is applied
without homogenization, to significantly control the formation of precipitates, even
in the Al-Si alloy system[21-35]. However, some preliminary experiments have revealed that certain heat treatments
influence the deformation behavior of Al alloys fabricated by L-PBF, leading to more
stable deformation under compression[13-15].
To improve compressive properties using heat treatment, it is first necessary to understand
the development of the microstructures of L-PBF Al alloys during the heat treatment
process, along with the associated mechanical properties.
Aluminum (Al) alloys have long been preferred engineering components in the aerospace,
automotive, and marine industries. In these applications, components can experience
highly dynamic loading conditions, such as vehicle crashes or aircraft bird strikes.
Accordingly, it is essential to investigate the deformation behavior of such alloys
under these extreme conditions[36]. However, the mechanisms of compression deformation and strengthening have not been
studied in detail so far.
Several factors (e.g., temperature and strain rate) are known to influence compressive
flow stress and the associated microstructures[36]. Moreover, the evolution of flow stress is correlated with different dynamic softening
mechanisms during high-temperature deformation under various conditions[36-38]. Generally, dynamic recovery (DRV) and dynamic recrystallization (DRX) are the main
softening mechanisms in high-temperature compressive deformation processes[39-43].
Recent research has been conducted on the high-temperature deformation and microstructural
evolution of metals and alloys. Liu et al. showed that the dynamic softening mechanism
of 2219 Al forged alloy was DRV and incomplete CDRX through analysis of electron backscattered
diffraction (EBSD) micrographs[44]. Ezatpour et al[45]. examined the deformation behavior of AA6061 alloy at different temperatures and
strain rates. They observed a transition in the dominant softening mechanism from
DRV to DRX by changing the Z parameter. Yang et al[46]. found that the fraction of DRX in Al 6A82 alloys depends on the Z parameter. Asgharzadeh
et al[47]. found that the softening mechanism is dominated by DRV at high ln Z and by DRX at
low ln Z in the Al 6063 alloy. Similar results were found by Liu et al[48] in Al-Mg-Si alloy. Suzuki et al[49]. reported the effect of heat treatment on the compressive deformation behavior of
lattice-structured AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated by L-PBF.
Although many studies and reports have focused on the compressive deformation behavior
of nickel-matrix composites, aluminum alloys, magnesium alloys, and other metals,
few studies have investigated the flow stress behavior and microstructural evolution
of AlSi10Mg aluminum alloy during high-temperature compression deformation tests.
Moreover, the influence of heat treatment on the high-temperature compressive deformation
and microstructural evolution during the deformation mechanism of AlSi10Mg alloy produced
by the L-PBF process has not yet been reported.
This work aims to investigate the influence of different heat treatment conditions
on the high-temperature compressive deformation behavior of the AlSi10Mg alloy. Specifically,
the compressive deformation behavior of the selected alloy is studied using uniaxial
compression tests performed at various temperatures. The flow stress behavior during
high-temperature compressive deformation was investigated to understand the microstructural
evolution and various dynamic softening mechanisms under different deformation conditions.
In addition, factors influencing the dynamic deformation mechanisms of the AlSi10Mg
alloy are discussed.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Material and heat treatment
The AlSi10Mg alloy used in this study was a 10 × 10 × 100 mm3 bar manufactured by the L-PBF process. The chemical composition of the alloy was
Si-9.57%, Mg-0.31%, Fe-0.17%, and Al-89.95% (wt.%). Specimens fabricated from the
as-built AlSi10Mg alloy were subjected to T6 heat treatment and direct aging (DA)
to obtain distinct microstructural and mechanical properties. The T6 heat treatment
consisted of solutionizing at 520 oC for 2 h, followed by water quenching and subsequent artificial aging at 180 oC for 6 h. In contrast, the direct-aging (DA) treatment involved aging the as-fabricated
specimens directly at 180 oC for 6 h without prior solution treatment. The detailed heat treatment procedure
has been reported in our earlier publication[50].
2.2 High temperature compression test
Cylindrical compression specimens with a diameter of 3 mm and a length of 5 mm in
aligned build direction were machined from the T6 and DA heat-treated bars. Quasi-static
compression tests at room and high temperatures were conducted using MTS-810 equipment.
A schematic depiction of the high-temperature compression test (compression axial
was parallel to the build direction) is illustrated in Fig. 1. The specimens were heated to different deformation temperatures such as 150 oC, 200 oC, and 250 oC at a heating rate of 5 oC/min and held for 10 minutes to achieve a uniform temperature distribution. Subsequently,
all the specimens were compressed to a strain of 30% with a strain rate of 10-3/s, followed by immediate water quenching to room temperature to preserve the deformed
microstructure. The stress–strain data were automatically recorded by the control
system, and strain was calculated from the crosshead displacement of the MTS-810 machine
without an external extensometer or DIC. We acknowledge that this approach has lower
precision, especially in the elastic regime, due to machine compliance. However, because
the focus of this study is on comparing plastic flow behavior and microstructural
evolution at large strains (up to 30%) under identical testing conditions, this method
is sufficient to capture the relative differences in flow stress and strengthening
mechanisms among the heat-treated alloys.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental high temperature compression test with
sample dimensions.
2.3 Microstructural observation
The deformed specimens were then sliced along the compression direction (CD) for microstructural
analysis. The specimens for microstructural observation were prepared by the usual
metallographic polishing followed by etching with Keller’s reagent to reveal the microstructure.
The specimens were examined at different magnifications using field emission scanning
electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4300 SE) and electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD,
OXFORD; Nordlys nano detector, step size 200 nm, 15 kV). The multi-purpose X-ray diffraction
(MP-XRD, Pro MRD) analysis was carried out using Cu–Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) radiation in
the scanning range of 25–90 o (2θ) and at a scanning rate of 4 o/min. The distribution of dislocations and the dislocation-boundary interactions were
characterized using electron channeling contrast imaging (ECCI).
3. RESULTS
3.1 Microstructure and flow stress behavior
3.1.1 Initial microstructural analysis
The initial analyses of the microstructure of the AlSi10Mg specimens were performed
on the plane perpendicular to the build direction for as-built, T6, and DA specimens,
as presented in Fig. 2 (a)(d), (b)(e), and (c)(f), respectively. Fig. 2(a) shows a semi-elliptical melt pool shape (fish scale pattern) along the build direction,
attributed to the Gaussian effect of the incident laser beams. In the FE-SEM image,
Fig. 2(d) reveals a notably inhomogeneous microstructure, with coarser microstructure at the
molten pool boundaries compared to the interior regions. Also, the Si precipitates
are located at the cellular structure boundary formed inside the molten pool. After
T6 heat treatment, the molten pools and laser traces become almost invisible in the
transverse direction, as illustrated in Fig. 2(b) and (e).
During solution heat treatment, significant homogeneity is achieved as the segregated
Si around α-Al grains diffuses to form particles that are homogeneously dispersed
in the α-Al matrix, as shown in Fig. 2(e). Microstructural homogenization, elimination of molten pools, and the scattered distribution
of silicon particles with the formation of an Mg-containing intermetallic phase (Mg2Si) with a rod/needle-shaped morphology were observed after T6 heat treatment. The
DA process indicates that the microstructure of the molten pool with the cellular
structure was retained even under the heat treatment conditions applied to the DA
alloy, as shown in Fig. 2(c) and (f). Notably, a large amount of fine Si precipitate was generated inside the DA alloy's
cellular structure, which is absent in the as-built alloy.
Fig. 2. Optical and FE-SEM initial microstructures of undeformed as-built (a) and
(d), T6 (b) and (e), DA (c) and (f) specimens, respectively.
3.1.2 Compression behavior at room temperature
Characteristic compressive stress-strain plots for as-built, T6, and DA samples are
depicted in Fig. 3. The curves show no sharp yield point; therefore, the yield strength values were
determined using a 0.2% strain offset procedure, as recommended in the ASTM standard
E8M. As shown in Fig. 3, the T6 specimen exhibits lower yield strength (YS) and peak strength, as expected.
The yield strength values for the DA specimen are 342 MPa, while those for the as-built
and T6 specimens are 320 MPa and 183 MPa, respectively. Therefore, the direct-aged
specimen has higher compressive strength than the other two specimen conditions.
Fig. 3. Engineering stress-strain compression curves of the as-built, T6 and DA specimens.
3.1.3 Compression test at different elevated temperatures
Fig. 4 (a), (b), and (c) show the true stress-strain curves obtained from the compression tests of as-built,
T6, and DA samples conducted at elevated temperatures of 150 oC (423K), 200 oC (473K), and 250 oC (523K), respectively. All three conditions at room temperature indicated that strain
hardening predominates; the flow stress increased continuously with significant work
hardening. For all compression test conditions, the flow stress increased sharply
at the beginning of the plastic deformation stage, which can be attributed to work
hardening caused by the increase in dislocation density[51].
High-temperature compressive flow stress behavior at different temperatures for the
selected heat-treated conditions is illustrated in Fig. 5. During high-temperature compression deformation, the flow stress maintains a higher
level without significant softening as the strain increases after reaching the peak
stress (σp). Generally, this softening is caused by either DRV (dynamic recovery) or DRX (dynamic
recrystallization). In this investigation, the flow curve shape was restricted, and
a dynamic recovery mechanism balanced the strain hardening.
As expected, the high-temperature compressive deformation behavior was sensitive to
deformation temperature, i.e., the flow stress decreased with increasing temperature.
With direct aging, the compressive strain accumulation was insignificant, and the
attainment of dynamic softening was very rapid compared to the other two test conditions.
In direct-aged specimens, the existing dislocation density is high, and during high-temperature
deformation, the strain causes re-arrangement of the dislocations into a new formation
that offers less resistance to deformation. Therefore, dynamic recovery softening
occurs very quickly. It may be inferred that the presence of Si particles in direct-aged
specimens prevents further deformation or generation of dislocations[50].
In Fig. 6, the yield strength of compressively deformed specimens at various temperatures is
represented as a bar chart. Detailed values of yield strength, strain hardening exponent,
and strength coefficient for high-temperature compressively deformed as-built, T6,
and DA specimens are displayed in Table 1. Zhang et al[52]. also reported that the strain hardening coefficient and strength were fundamental
mechanical parameters for metallic material performance. The relationship between
the strength coefficient (K) and temperature (oC), as well as strain rate, is similar to that of the strain hardening exponent (n).
The strength coefficient decreases with temperature and increases with strain rate.
This investigation indicates that the strain hardening exponent and strength coefficient
decrease with increasing temperature due to dislocation annihilation and the growth
of dynamic recovery.
Fig. 7 illustrates the microhardness values for undeformed and compressively deformed as-built,
T6, and DA specimens at room and elevated temperatures. The compressively deformed
specimens at room temperature show higher hardness values than the undeformed specimens
under all three conditions. During the compression test at room temperature, the flow
stress-strain curves display significant strain hardening behavior, which correlates
with high hardness values. The hardness values increased sequentially up to 150 oC due to sustained flow stress and appropriate work hardening behavior, after which
they gradually decreased for high-temperature compressively deformed specimens at
200 oC and 250 oC. Therefore, under high-temperature compression conditions, strain hardening is balanced
by dynamic softening behavior (DRV and/or DRX). Overall, the DA specimens were observed
to possess higher hardness than both the as-built and T6 specimens.
Fig. 4. Compression stress-strain curves of the as-built, T6 and DA specimens at different
elevated temperatures.
Fig. 5. Flow stress-strain curves of different temperatures (a) room temperature,
(b) 150 oC (423K), (c) 200 oC (473K), and (d) 250 oC (523K).
Fig. 6. Compressive properties for as-built, T6 and DA specimens at different elevated
temperatures.
Table 1. Compressive properties of the as-built, T6 and DA specimens at different
elevated temperatures.
|
Test conditions
|
Temperature
|
Yield Strength (YS) MPa
|
Strain hardening exponent (n)
|
Strength co-efficient (K) MPa
|
|
As-built
|
RT
|
310
|
0.34
|
1513
|
|
423
|
273
|
0.30
|
808
|
|
473
|
252
|
0.23
|
587
|
|
523
|
186
|
0.22
|
457
|
|
T6
|
RT
|
187
|
0.36
|
909
|
|
423
|
170
|
0.29
|
450
|
|
473
|
95
|
0.24
|
327
|
|
523
|
67
|
0.23
|
224
|
|
DA
|
RT
|
353
|
0.27
|
1490
|
|
423
|
286
|
0.24
|
824
|
|
473
|
260
|
0.20
|
721
|
|
523
|
193
|
0.21
|
503
|
Fig. 7. Vickers hardness values of the initial and deformed as-built, T6 and DA specimens
at different temperatures.
3.1.4 Microstructural evolution in the deformed specimens
3.1.4.1 Deformation behavior of compression tests at room temperature
To understand the influence of compressive deformation on the microstructural variation
of the AlSi10Mg alloy, a series of compression test samples were characterized using
optical microscopy. Typical optical microstructures of room-temperature compressively
deformed specimens for the as-built, T6, and DA conditions are shown in Fig. 8(a), (b), and (c), respectively. In Fig. 8(a), the as-built deformed sample shows a flattened semi-elliptical melt pool shape (fish
scale pattern) due to compression loading. After compression, the Si particles, which
were crowded in the undeformed T6 specimens, become segregated in the deformed condition
due to compressive deformation, as shown in Fig. 8(b). Additionally, the cracks in the deformed samples clearly propagate through the grain
boundaries from one Si particle to another. Notably, the optical microstructures of
the deformed specimens in transverse view for the as-built and DA samples show a clearly
compressed form of semi-elliptical melt pools, as depicted in Fig. 8(a) and (c), respectively. In both conditions, the original grains/boundaries (melt pools) become
elongated due to strain, but no visible cracks are observed.
To better understand the microstructural variations during compressive deformation,
the as-built, T6, and DA specimens were further compared with undeformed specimens
using FE-SEM images, as shown in Fig. 9. Fig. 9 (a)(b)(c) and (d)(e)(f) show the microstructural images of the as-built (a)(d), T6 (b)(e), DA (c)(f) specimens for undeformed and compressive deformed conditions, respectively. As mentioned
earlier, in the as-built and DA specimens, the original grains/boundaries (melt pools)
become elongated due to strain, but the sub-grains/boundaries remain more or less
equiaxed, similar to the undeformed conditions. Notably, the extent of fine Si particles
has relatively increased inside the cellular region of the compressively deformed
as-built and DA specimens. Due to compression loading, an insignificant fine crack
(circled in yellow) was observed on the cellular boundaries, as shown in Fig. 9(d) and (f). At higher magnification, the coarser Si particles in the T6 specimens appear significantly
deformed, as indicated in Fig. 9(e). This also suggests the brittle nature of the coarser Si particles. Primarily, the
impact of homogenization on changes in morphology (such as coarsening) is known to
adversely affect the strength of the material. The higher compressive strength observed
in direct aged conditions is attributed to the formation of fine-sized Si precipitates
in the cellular structure.
Fig. 8. Typical optical microstructures of compressive deformed specimens at room
temperature for as-built (a), T6 (b), and DA (c) conditions.
Fig. 9. FE-SEM images of (a)(d) as-built, (b)(e) T6, and (c)(f) DA specimens for:
(a)(b)(c) undeformed and (d)(e)(f) compressive deformed conditions.
3.1.4.2 Deformation behavior of compression tests at different elevated temperatures
To understand the influence of temperature on compressive deformation and microstructural
variation in the investigated specimens, a series of compression tests were performed
at various temperatures using optical and FE-SEM analysis. Typical optical and FESEM
microstructures of the deformed as-built specimens at different temperatures, 150
oC (423 K), 200 oC (473 K), and 250 oC (523 K), are shown in Fig. 10(a)(d), (b)(e), and (c)(f), respectively. Fig. 8(a) shows the micrograph of the as-built sample tested at room temperature, where deformed
fine melt pool boundaries are observed. Fig. 10(a-c) shows the microstructures of the samples tested at elevated temperatures of 150 oC, 200 oC, and 250 oC, respectively. At these elevated temperatures, the microstructure did not show any
significant changes compared to the room temperature sample. However, notable microstructural
variations were observed at higher magnification. Fig. 10(d-f) shows the FE-SEM microstructures of the deformed as-built samples at 150 oC, 200 oC, and 250 oC, respectively. The Si particles became coarser as the deformation temperature increased
from 150 oC to 250 oC, and this agglomeration is believed to be responsible for the reduced strength of
the heat-treated samples.
Optical and FE-SEM microstructures of the deformed T6 specimens at different temperatures,
150 oC (423 K), 200 oC (473 K), and 250 oC (523 K), are shown in Fig. 11(a)(d), (b)(e), and (c)(f), respectively. High-temperature compressive deformation of T6 samples, near the recrystallization
temperature, caused significant microstructural changes as shown in Fig. 11(f). Here, the precipitation of Si particles occurred and coalesced into large Si-rich
agglomerates (circled in red). At elevated temperatures, the T6 specimens showed a
significant reduction in flow stress and enhanced elongation. It has been reported
that reduced solid-solution hardening, due to the precipitation and coarsening of
Si particles with increasing temperature, leads to reduced strength.
Optical and FE-SEM microstructures of the deformed direct aged specimens at different
temperatures, 150 oC (423 K), 200 oC (473 K), and 250 oC (523 K), are shown in Fig. 12(a)(d), (b)(e), and (c)(f), respectively. Ma et al.[53] suggested that a significant amount of Si exists in the Al phase, and provides a
driving force for the growth of more Si particles. Fig. 12(d) shows the fine cellular structure of the DA samples at low temperature, consisting
of a fine dispersion of Si particles along the cell boundaries and the Al-Si matrix.
In Fig. 12(e) and (f), as the temperature increases, the fine Si particles become coarser and the cellular
boundaries expand. This expansion of grain boundaries is more clearly visible, and
the equiaxed cellular structure remains stable, unlike in the as-built conditions.
The direct-aged specimens exhibit higher compressive strength than the as-built specimens
because of the fine Si particles within the fine equiaxed cellular structure.
Illustrative ECCI images were taken to understand the substructural variation during
compressive deformation at high temperatures. Fig. 13 shows the observed dislocation variations in the as-built and heat-treated specimens
(T6 and DA) subjected to compression tests at room temperature and 250 oC. Fig. 13(a) shows the distribution of fine Si particles within the thin cellular region subjected
to compressive deformation of the as-built specimen at room temperature. Moreover,
Fig. 13(d) clearly shows that the denser dislocation pattern (marked in yellow) and the wider
cellular boundaries (marked in red) in the high-temperature deformed specimens are
more pronounced compared to those in the room temperature specimens. As mentioned
in Section 3.3, in the high-temperature T6 specimen, the precipitated nano Si particles
have coalesced into large Si-rich agglomerates, as shown in Fig. 13(e), which is not observed in Fig. 13(b).
Fig. 13(c) and (d) show the ECCI results for the high temperature deformed DA specimen, that confirm
the presence of coarser Si particles and expanded cellular boundaries. In the high-temperature
deformed DA specimen, a greater number of dislocations are distributed within the
fine grain boundary matrix, and the equiaxed cellular structure remains stable, unlike
the as-built conditions. This stability is attributed to the DA specimen having higher
compressive strength compared to the other two specimens.
Fig. 10. Optical (a, b c) and FE-SEM (d, e, f) microstructures of compressive deformed
as-built specimens at (a) (d) 150 oC, (b) (e) 200 oC, (c) (f) 250 oC different temperatures.
Fig. 11. Optical (a, b c) and FE-SEM (d, e, f) microstructures of compressive deformed
T6 specimens at (a) (d) 150 oC, (b) (e) 200 oC, (c) (f) 250 oC different temperatures.
Fig. 12. Optical (a, b c) and FE-SEM (d, e, f) microstructures of compressive deformed
direct aged specimens at (a) (d) 150 oC, (b) (e) 200 oC, (c) (f) 250 oC different temperatures.
Fig. 13. ECCI images of deformed as-built (a)(d), T6 (b)(e), and DA (c)(f) specimens
at room temperature (a) (b) (c) and 250 oC (d) (e) (f).
4. DISCUSSION
4.1 High-temperature compressive deformation mechanism
The EBSD analysis (Fig. 14) shows that the microstructure of the deformed materials at room temperature is inhomogeneous,
featuring dynamically recrystallized small grains at the boundaries around deformed
grains and nearly equiaxed sub-grains within these grains, indicating clear dynamic
recovery (DRV). Depending on the temperature, either DRX (dynamic recrystallization),
DRV, or both may be the dominant relaxation mechanisms. It is generally believed that
DRV and DRX are the primary restoration mechanisms for metals and alloys during high-temperature
compressive deformation. This restoration behavior results from the interaction between
dislocations and particles or grain boundaries. The annihilation and nucleation of
dislocations occur rapidly with increasing temperature during the DRV process[54].
For the as-built and DA conditions, the deformed elongated grain boundaries (melt
pools) do not contain any new grains; instead, the cellular region exhibits the presence
of sub-grains. These features can likely be attributed to dynamic recovery (DRV) processes
occurring within the grain interior. The results indicate that the micro-mechanisms
involved in dynamic recrystallization and recovery are complex and strongly influenced
by deformation conditions. In materials with high stacking fault energy, cross-slip
occurs. The arrangement of dislocations leads to numerous LAGBs (low grain angle boundaries)
around the sub-grains that formed from the deformed cell structure, as shown in Fig. 14. The subsequent continuous rotation of sub-grains, upon further high-temperature
deformation (250 oC), results in a progressive increase in misorientation, leading to the formation
of HAGBs as indicated in Fig. 15. The grain exhibits twins, and the twin boundary loses the twin relation and transforms
into HABs. Subsequently, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) grains are generated and
homogeneously distributed, facilitated by parallel micro-bands and the rotation of
sub-grains. This process is generally referred to as continuous dynamic recrystallization
(CDRX)[55-57].
Fig. 14. EBSD and IPF analysis results of deformed as-built, T6 and DA specimens at
room temperature.
Fig. 15. EBSD and IPF analysis results of deformed as-built, T6 and DA specimens at
high temperature 250 oC.
4.1.1 Effect of strain
Fig. 16 illustrates the restoration mechanisms in the as-built, T6, and DA specimens during
high-temperature compression. In all three conditions, distinct initial microstructures
were observed: as-built—fine equiaxed cellular structure (primary Al-Si eutectic phase),
T6—coarser Si particles (primary Si phase), and DA—fine equiaxed cellular structure
with sub-grain Si particles (primary Al-Si eutectic phase and secondary Si particles),
as shown in Fig. 9. It is well-established that incompatibility arises in the Al-Si matrix as strain
increases. Si particles typically lead to a high density of dislocations accumulating
around these sites; dislocation motion via climbing and sliding ultimately concentrates
stress around these particles[58].
Three distinct interactions (I, II, and III) between particles and dislocations during
the restoration mechanism are indicated in Fig. 16. For the as-built, T6, and DA conditions, dislocations accumulate rapidly during
the initial stages of deformation (I). Subsequently, the dislocation density decreases
significantly, and stress concentration is generally alleviated by dynamic recovery
(DRV), leading to the formation of sub-grains within the deformed grains. Notably,
submicron Si particles dispersed in the matrix exert a pinning effect on dislocation
motion and grain boundary sliding (II). This pinning effect is crucial to impede both
dislocation climb and sliding, and to facilitate the transformation from LAGBs (low
angle grain boundaries) to HAGBs (high angle grain boundaries).
Additionally, the DRV/DRX process is effectively suppressed when the pinning force
exceeds the driving force for grain boundary growth. At high strain, dislocations
rapidly aggregate around irregular primary eutectic phases or secondary submicron
Si particles, leading to highly concentrated stress at these sites (III). This concentrated
stress makes dynamic recovery more challenging. Consequently, the irregular eutectic
phases (cellular boundaries) or submicron particles are readily fragmented along the
flow direction. This fragmentation of stress concentration promotes DRX. Given the
relatively high stacking fault energy (SFE) of the material, the sub-grain boundaries
in deformed Al alloys continuously absorb active dislocations. Ultimately, LAGBs transform
into HAGBs, and sub-grains evolve into new DRX grains[57]. The dynamic restoration mechanism during deformation is significantly influenced
by elevated temperatures. The final microstructures at different temperatures (150
oC, 200 oC, and 250 oC) can be schematically illustrated after the restoration process.
Fig. 16. Schematic illustration of DRV mechanisms during the high temperature compressive
deformation process: (a) initial microstructure, (b) dislocation aggregated around
particles, (c) restoration mechanisms of DRV and (d) microstructure after the deformation
process..
4.1.2 Effect of temperature
It has been reported that at lower strain rates the size of sub-grains is strongly
influenced by temperature[58]. As previously mentioned, dislocation density increases significantly, and interactions
between dislocations reduce their mobility at room temperature. However, as the temperature
rises, the annihilation and nucleation of dislocations become more facile. The sub-grain
size for materials deformed at 250 oC is larger than those deformed at 150 oC and 200 oC.
During high-temperature deformation, the material undergoes deformation over an extended
period, allowing sufficient time for the arrangement and annihilation of dislocations.
This process leads to the formation of well-defined sub-grains, and the increased
dislocation mobility at elevated temperatures results in larger sub-grains. Figure 16 provides a schematic representation of the substructural variations with varying
temperatures for the as-built, T6, and DA conditions. Following the restoration mechanism
at lower temperatures, the general final microstructure for the T6 specimen consists
of sub-micron Si particles embedded within partially broken sub-grain boundaries (cellular
structure), alongside coarser Si particles. The presence of fine Si particles in the
homogeneous Al-Si equiaxed matrix contributes to the material's strength. At 200 oC, new sub-grain Si particles are generated in addition to the existing ones, resulting
in coarser sub-grain Si particles and Al-Si equiaxed grain boundaries compared to
lower temperatures. Notably, the grain boundaries become more fragmented with increasing
temperature.
In contrast, in the indirect aged conditions, the sub-grains, and grain boundaries
grew coarser without a fragmented equiaxed morphology. This may suggest that the existing
fine Si particles in the direct aged specimens offer less resistance to the deformation
(restricting further deformation/generation of dislocations). At the high temperature
of 250 oC, the fine Si particles in the cellular region are agglomerated towards the grain
boundaries and transformed into spherical shapes.
In the T6 specimen, the sub-grain nanoscale Si particles are agglomerated on the micro-scale
Si particles. Thus, direct aging heat treatment, nucleation, and growth lead to a
dense distribution of fine Si particles. However, pre-existing precipitates and finely
spaced eutectic Al-Si phase matrix during the high-temperature compression after the
deformation supports the growth of existing particles over the nucleation of new ones.
Thus, we obtain a coarser distribution of nanoparticles.
However. at high temperature the DA specimen eutectic phase boundaries get coarser,
maintaining the proper equiaxed morphology. This is also the reason high strength
is retained, compared to the as-built specimen. It may mean that the presence of Si
particles does not allow sufficient time for the arrangement and annihilation of dislocations
and the fragmentation of cellular boundaries, even at high concentrated stress. The
DA samples showed coarsening of existing precipitates and the eutectic cellular boundaries.
The cell regions near the eutectic phase boundaries were depleted of particles, and
while coarsened, most of the particles dominate the cell centers. These observations
imply that large particles (in the cells and the eutectic phase boundary) coarsen
at the expense of nano precipitates (Ostwald ripening) within the cell interiors during
high-temperature deformation.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The high-temperature compressive deformation behavior of various heat-treated L-PBF
AlSi10Mg alloys was studied within the temperature range of 423 K to 523 K at a strain
rate of 10-3/s. Based on experimental observations, the following major conclusions can be drawn:
1) The compressive yield strength of the DA specimen was 342 MPa, compared to 320
MPa for the as-built specimen and 183 MPa for the T6 specimen. Thus, the direct-aged
specimen exhibited higher compressive strength and hardness than both the as-built
and T6 specimens. The high temperature compressive deformation behavior is significantly
affected by the deformation temperature, i.e., the flow stress decreased with increasing
temperature for all three conditions. In direct aging, accumulation of compressive
strain was minimal, and dynamic softening occurred very rapidly, as the fine Si particles
offer reduced resistance to further deformation.
2) Regarding microstructural evolution during high-temperature compression, the DA
specimens retained long-term eutectic cellular structure stability, and fine Si particles,
that enable high resistance to deformation. It maintained a stable microstructure
capable of withstanding prolonged times even at elevated temperatures.
3)Dynamic recovery (DRV) is the main restoration mechanism. The annihilation and nucleation
of dislocations take place with increasing temperature during the DRV process. The
fine Si particles had a pinning effect on the motion of dislocations (climb and slide),
which effectively hindered the transformation from LAGBs into HAGBs. The dynamic restoration
mechanism occurred during the deformation, which is strongly influenced by the different
elevated temperatures.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded
by the Korean Government (MSIT) (NRF-2022R1A5A1030054 and NRF-RS-2023-00281508)
REFERENCES
Olakanmi E. O., Cochrane R. F., Dalgarno K. W., Prog. Mater. Sci., 74, 401 (2015)

Choi S.-H., Sung S.-Y., Choi H.-J., Sohn Y.-H., Han B.-S., Lee K.-A., Procedia Eng.,
10, 159 (2011)

Silbernagel C., Ashcroft I., Dickens P., Galea M., Addit. Manuf., 21, 395 (2018)

Thijs L., Kempen K., Kruth J.-P., Van Humbeeck J., Acta Mater., 61, 1809 (2013)

Wong K. K., Ho J. Y., Leong K. C., Wong T. N., Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 11, 159 (2016)

Aboulkhair N. T., Tuck C., Ashcroft I., Maskery I., Everitt N. M., Metall. Mater.
Trans. A, 46, 3337 (2015)

Read N., Wang W., Essa K., Attallah M. M., Mater. Des., 65, 417 (2015)

Aboulkhair N. T., Maskery I., Tuck C., Ashcroft I., Everitt N. M., Mater. Sci. Eng.
A, 667, 139 (2016)

Herzog D., Seyda V., Wycisk E., Emmelmann C., Acta Mater., 117, 371 (2016)

Rosenthal I., Stern A., Frage N., Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal., 3, 448 (2014)

Jang J.-H., Kang T.-H., Euh K.-J., Cho Y.-H., Lee K.-A., Korean J. Met. Mater., 62,
402 (2024)

Son H.-W., Jeong J.-E., Cho Y.-H., Kim S.-B., Lee J.-M., Korean J. Met. Mater., 63,
197 (2025)

Yu T., Hyer H., Sohn Y. H., Bai Y., Wu D., Mater. Des., 182, 108062 (2019)

Ceschini L., Morri A., Toschi S., Johansson S., Seifeddine S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A,
648, 340 (2015)

Zamani M., Seifeddine S., Jarfors A. E. W., Mater. Des., 86, 361 (2015)

Wei P., Wei Z., Chen Z., Du J., He Y., Li J., Zhou Y., Appl. Surf. Sci., 408, 38 (2017)

Hadadzadeh A., Amirkhiz B. S., Odeshi A., Li J., Mohammadi M., Addit. Manuf., 28,
1 (2019)

Hadadzadeh A., Baxter C., Amirkhiz B. S., Mohammadi M., Addit. Manuf., 23, 108 (2018)

Yang K. V., Rometsch P., Davies C., Huang A., Wu X., Mater. Des., 154, 275 (2018)

Rao J. H., Zhang Y., Fang X., Chen Y., Wu X., Davies C. H. J., Addit. Manuf., 17,
113 (2017)

Ma P., Prashanth K. G., Scudino S., Jia Y., Wang H., Zou C., Wei Z., Eckert J., Metals,
4, 28 (2014)

Prashanth K. G., Scudino S., Klauss H., Surreddi K. B., Lober L., Wang Z., Chaubey
A. K., Kuhn U., Eckert J., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 590, 153 (2014)

Bagherifard S., Beretta N., Monti S., Riccio M., Bandini M., Guagliano M., Mater.
Des., 145, 28 (2018)

Hitzler L., Hirsch J., Heine B., Merkel M., Hall W., Ochsner A., Materials, 10, 1136
(2017)

Kunze K., Etter T., Grasslin J., Shklover V., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 620, 213 (2014)

Wang D., Song C., Yang Y., Bai Y., Mater. Des., 100, 291 (2016)

Rao H., Giet S., Yang K., Wu X., Davies C. H. J., Mater. Des., 109, 334 (2016)

Cao W. D., Kennedy R. L., Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Derivatives (E.A. Loria),
213-222, TMS (2005)

Liu F., Yu F. X., Zhao D. Z., Zuo L. A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 528, 3786 (2011)

Kimura T., Nakamoto T., Mater. Des., 89, 1294 (2016)

Hitzler L., Janousch C., Schanz J., Merkel M., Heine B., Mack F., Hall W., Öchsner
A., J. Mater. Process. Technol., 243, 48 (2017)

Kempen K., Thijs L., Van Humbeeck J., Kruth J.-P., Mater. Sci. Technol., 31, 917 (2014)

Buchbinder D., Meiners W., Brandl E., Palm F., Müller-Lohmeier K., Wolter M., Over
C., Moll W., Weber J., Skrynecki N., Abschlussbericht – Generative Fertigung von Aluminiumbauteilen
für die Serienproduktion, 01RIO639A-D, BMBF, Fraunhofer ILT (2010)

Manfredi D., Calignano F., Krishnan M., Canali R., Ambrosio E. P., Atzeni E., Materials,
6, 856 (2013)

Rao J.H., Rometsch P., Wu X., Davies C.H., Additive Manufacturing for the Aerospace
Industry (F. Froes, R. Boyer), 143-161, Elsevier (2019)

Zaretsky E., Stern A., Frage N., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 688, 364 (2017)

Zhang Y., Li R., Li X., Yang Y., Chen P., Dong F., Peng R., Metals, 8, 814 (2018)

Lin Y. C., Dong W. Y., Zhou M., Wen D. X., Chen D. D., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 718, 165
(2018)

Deshpande A., Hsu K., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 711, 62 (2017)

Huang C., Deng J., Wang S., Liu L., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 699, 106 (2017)

Otto F., Frenzel J., Eggeler G., J. Alloys Compd., 509, 4073 (2011)

Wen D., Lin Y., Li H., Chen X., Deng J., Li L., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 591, 183 (2014)

Cheng L., Chang H., Tang B., Kou H., Li J., J. Alloys Compd., 552, 363 (2013)

Liu L., Wu Y., Gong H., Liu S., Ahmad A., Materials, 11, 1443 (2018)

Ezatpour H. R., Sabzevar M. H., Sajjadi S. A., Huang Y., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 606,
240 (2014)

Yang Q. Y., Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 26, 649 (2016)

Asgharzadeh H., Simchi A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 542, 56 (2012)

Liu S. H., J. Mater. Sci., 54, 4366 (2019)

Suzuki A., Adv. Eng. Mater., 21, 1900571 (2019)

Baek M. S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 819, 141486 (2021)

Wang M. J., J. Alloys Compd., 820, 153325 (2020)

Zhang Z., Zhao W., Sun Q., Li C., J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 15, 19 (2006)

Ma P., Metals, 4, 28 (2014)

Chaudhuri A., J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 28, 448 (2019)

Wang B., J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 22, 2382 (2013)

Sakai T., Jonas J. J., Acta Metall., 32, 189 (1984)

Gubicza J., J. Alloys Compd., 378, 248 (2004)

Zhang Y., JOM, 72, 1638 (2020)
