The Journal of
the Korean Journal of Metals and Materials

The Journal of
the Korean Journal of Metals and Materials

Monthly
  • pISSN : 1738-8228
  • eISSN : 2288-8241

Editorial Office


  1. (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, 22212, Republic of Korea)



AlSi10Mg alloy, Laser powder bed fusion, High temperature compression, Heat treatment, Flow behavior

1. INTRODUCTION

Aluminum (Al) and its alloys provide benefits of light weight, high strength, corrosion resistance, and good weldability and are consequently widely used in diverse applications in the automotive, aerospace, machinery, and aeronautical industries[1, 2]. Among Al alloys, AlSi10Mg outperforms other cast Al alloys in terms of hardness, tensile strength, corrosion resistance, excellent wear resistance, high specific strength, and ductility[3-12]. When the AlSi10Mg alloy is used in additive manufacturing, the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process is highly suitable, as an alternative to traditional methods[13]. L-PBF is a layer-by-layer additive manufacturing technique that can form parts with complex geometries, and provides considerable flexibility in shaping, and high material usage efficiency. For these reasons it has attracted great interest in many industrial applications that require near-net shape manufacturing of lightweight components. The process enables the formation of unique and fine microstructures that enhance the strength of the material, which are typically lacking in traditional methods[14-18].

As a result, in recent years many engineering industries have developed post-processing procedures suitable for L-PBF AlSi10Mg alloys[19, 20]. These methods primarily involve a complex heat treatment process that includes stress relief, sample removal, solution treatment, and artificial aging[19, 20]. Recently, numerous investigations have reported that, when using L-PBF built Al alloy, microstructural variations and mechanical properties can be finely controlled by using appropriate heat treatment within a wide range. This makes it possible to meet specific requirements such as T6, i.e., solution heat treatment plus precipitation hardening. Direct aging has also been introduced, in which heat treatment is applied without homogenization, to significantly control the formation of precipitates, even in the Al-Si alloy system[21-35]. However, some preliminary experiments have revealed that certain heat treatments influence the deformation behavior of Al alloys fabricated by L-PBF, leading to more stable deformation under compression[13-15].

To improve compressive properties using heat treatment, it is first necessary to understand the development of the microstructures of L-PBF Al alloys during the heat treatment process, along with the associated mechanical properties.

Aluminum (Al) alloys have long been preferred engineering components in the aerospace, automotive, and marine industries. In these applications, components can experience highly dynamic loading conditions, such as vehicle crashes or aircraft bird strikes. Accordingly, it is essential to investigate the deformation behavior of such alloys under these extreme conditions[36]. However, the mechanisms of compression deformation and strengthening have not been studied in detail so far.

Several factors (e.g., temperature and strain rate) are known to influence compressive flow stress and the associated microstructures[36]. Moreover, the evolution of flow stress is correlated with different dynamic softening mechanisms during high-temperature deformation under various conditions[36-38]. Generally, dynamic recovery (DRV) and dynamic recrystallization (DRX) are the main softening mechanisms in high-temperature compressive deformation processes[39-43].

Recent research has been conducted on the high-temperature deformation and microstructural evolution of metals and alloys. Liu et al. showed that the dynamic softening mechanism of 2219 Al forged alloy was DRV and incomplete CDRX through analysis of electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) micrographs[44]. Ezatpour et al[45]. examined the deformation behavior of AA6061 alloy at different temperatures and strain rates. They observed a transition in the dominant softening mechanism from DRV to DRX by changing the Z parameter. Yang et al[46]. found that the fraction of DRX in Al 6A82 alloys depends on the Z parameter. Asgharzadeh et al[47]. found that the softening mechanism is dominated by DRV at high ln Z and by DRX at low ln Z in the Al 6063 alloy. Similar results were found by Liu et al[48] in Al-Mg-Si alloy. Suzuki et al[49]. reported the effect of heat treatment on the compressive deformation behavior of lattice-structured AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated by L-PBF.

Although many studies and reports have focused on the compressive deformation behavior of nickel-matrix composites, aluminum alloys, magnesium alloys, and other metals, few studies have investigated the flow stress behavior and microstructural evolution of AlSi10Mg aluminum alloy during high-temperature compression deformation tests. Moreover, the influence of heat treatment on the high-temperature compressive deformation and microstructural evolution during the deformation mechanism of AlSi10Mg alloy produced by the L-PBF process has not yet been reported.

This work aims to investigate the influence of different heat treatment conditions on the high-temperature compressive deformation behavior of the AlSi10Mg alloy. Specifically, the compressive deformation behavior of the selected alloy is studied using uniaxial compression tests performed at various temperatures. The flow stress behavior during high-temperature compressive deformation was investigated to understand the microstructural evolution and various dynamic softening mechanisms under different deformation conditions. In addition, factors influencing the dynamic deformation mechanisms of the AlSi10Mg alloy are discussed.

2. EXPERIMENTAL

2.1 Material and heat treatment

The AlSi10Mg alloy used in this study was a 10 × 10 × 100 mm3 bar manufactured by the L-PBF process. The chemical composition of the alloy was Si-9.57%, Mg-0.31%, Fe-0.17%, and Al-89.95% (wt.%). Specimens fabricated from the as-built AlSi10Mg alloy were subjected to T6 heat treatment and direct aging (DA) to obtain distinct microstructural and mechanical properties. The T6 heat treatment consisted of solutionizing at 520 oC for 2 h, followed by water quenching and subsequent artificial aging at 180 oC for 6 h. In contrast, the direct-aging (DA) treatment involved aging the as-fabricated specimens directly at 180 oC for 6 h without prior solution treatment. The detailed heat treatment procedure has been reported in our earlier publication[50].

2.2 High temperature compression test

Cylindrical compression specimens with a diameter of 3 mm and a length of 5 mm in aligned build direction were machined from the T6 and DA heat-treated bars. Quasi-static compression tests at room and high temperatures were conducted using MTS-810 equipment. A schematic depiction of the high-temperature compression test (compression axial was parallel to the build direction) is illustrated in Fig. 1. The specimens were heated to different deformation temperatures such as 150 oC, 200 oC, and 250 oC at a heating rate of 5 oC/min and held for 10 minutes to achieve a uniform temperature distribution. Subsequently, all the specimens were compressed to a strain of 30% with a strain rate of 10-3/s, followed by immediate water quenching to room temperature to preserve the deformed microstructure. The stress–strain data were automatically recorded by the control system, and strain was calculated from the crosshead displacement of the MTS-810 machine without an external extensometer or DIC. We acknowledge that this approach has lower precision, especially in the elastic regime, due to machine compliance. However, because the focus of this study is on comparing plastic flow behavior and microstructural evolution at large strains (up to 30%) under identical testing conditions, this method is sufficient to capture the relative differences in flow stress and strengthening mechanisms among the heat-treated alloys.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental high temperature compression test with sample dimensions.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig1.png

2.3 Microstructural observation

The deformed specimens were then sliced along the compression direction (CD) for microstructural analysis. The specimens for microstructural observation were prepared by the usual metallographic polishing followed by etching with Keller’s reagent to reveal the microstructure. The specimens were examined at different magnifications using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4300 SE) and electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD, OXFORD; Nordlys nano detector, step size 200 nm, 15 kV). The multi-purpose X-ray diffraction (MP-XRD, Pro MRD) analysis was carried out using Cu–Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) radiation in the scanning range of 25–90 o (2θ) and at a scanning rate of 4 o/min. The distribution of dislocations and the dislocation-boundary interactions were characterized using electron channeling contrast imaging (ECCI).

3. RESULTS

3.1 Microstructure and flow stress behavior

3.1.1 Initial microstructural analysis

The initial analyses of the microstructure of the AlSi10Mg specimens were performed on the plane perpendicular to the build direction for as-built, T6, and DA specimens, as presented in Fig. 2 (a)(d), (b)(e), and (c)(f), respectively. Fig. 2(a) shows a semi-elliptical melt pool shape (fish scale pattern) along the build direction, attributed to the Gaussian effect of the incident laser beams. In the FE-SEM image, Fig. 2(d) reveals a notably inhomogeneous microstructure, with coarser microstructure at the molten pool boundaries compared to the interior regions. Also, the Si precipitates are located at the cellular structure boundary formed inside the molten pool. After T6 heat treatment, the molten pools and laser traces become almost invisible in the transverse direction, as illustrated in Fig. 2(b) and (e).

During solution heat treatment, significant homogeneity is achieved as the segregated Si around α-Al grains diffuses to form particles that are homogeneously dispersed in the α-Al matrix, as shown in Fig. 2(e). Microstructural homogenization, elimination of molten pools, and the scattered distribution of silicon particles with the formation of an Mg-containing intermetallic phase (Mg2Si) with a rod/needle-shaped morphology were observed after T6 heat treatment. The DA process indicates that the microstructure of the molten pool with the cellular structure was retained even under the heat treatment conditions applied to the DA alloy, as shown in Fig. 2(c) and (f). Notably, a large amount of fine Si precipitate was generated inside the DA alloy's cellular structure, which is absent in the as-built alloy.

Fig. 2. Optical and FE-SEM initial microstructures of undeformed as-built (a) and (d), T6 (b) and (e), DA (c) and (f) specimens, respectively.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig2.png

3.1.2 Compression behavior at room temperature

Characteristic compressive stress-strain plots for as-built, T6, and DA samples are depicted in Fig. 3. The curves show no sharp yield point; therefore, the yield strength values were determined using a 0.2% strain offset procedure, as recommended in the ASTM standard E8M. As shown in Fig. 3, the T6 specimen exhibits lower yield strength (YS) and peak strength, as expected. The yield strength values for the DA specimen are 342 MPa, while those for the as-built and T6 specimens are 320 MPa and 183 MPa, respectively. Therefore, the direct-aged specimen has higher compressive strength than the other two specimen conditions.

Fig. 3. Engineering stress-strain compression curves of the as-built, T6 and DA specimens.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig3.png

3.1.3 Compression test at different elevated temperatures

Fig. 4 (a), (b), and (c) show the true stress-strain curves obtained from the compression tests of as-built, T6, and DA samples conducted at elevated temperatures of 150 oC (423K), 200 oC (473K), and 250 oC (523K), respectively. All three conditions at room temperature indicated that strain hardening predominates; the flow stress increased continuously with significant work hardening. For all compression test conditions, the flow stress increased sharply at the beginning of the plastic deformation stage, which can be attributed to work hardening caused by the increase in dislocation density[51].

High-temperature compressive flow stress behavior at different temperatures for the selected heat-treated conditions is illustrated in Fig. 5. During high-temperature compression deformation, the flow stress maintains a higher level without significant softening as the strain increases after reaching the peak stress (σp). Generally, this softening is caused by either DRV (dynamic recovery) or DRX (dynamic recrystallization). In this investigation, the flow curve shape was restricted, and a dynamic recovery mechanism balanced the strain hardening.

As expected, the high-temperature compressive deformation behavior was sensitive to deformation temperature, i.e., the flow stress decreased with increasing temperature. With direct aging, the compressive strain accumulation was insignificant, and the attainment of dynamic softening was very rapid compared to the other two test conditions. In direct-aged specimens, the existing dislocation density is high, and during high-temperature deformation, the strain causes re-arrangement of the dislocations into a new formation that offers less resistance to deformation. Therefore, dynamic recovery softening occurs very quickly. It may be inferred that the presence of Si particles in direct-aged specimens prevents further deformation or generation of dislocations[50].

In Fig. 6, the yield strength of compressively deformed specimens at various temperatures is represented as a bar chart. Detailed values of yield strength, strain hardening exponent, and strength coefficient for high-temperature compressively deformed as-built, T6, and DA specimens are displayed in Table 1. Zhang et al[52]. also reported that the strain hardening coefficient and strength were fundamental mechanical parameters for metallic material performance. The relationship between the strength coefficient (K) and temperature (oC), as well as strain rate, is similar to that of the strain hardening exponent (n). The strength coefficient decreases with temperature and increases with strain rate. This investigation indicates that the strain hardening exponent and strength coefficient decrease with increasing temperature due to dislocation annihilation and the growth of dynamic recovery.

Fig. 7 illustrates the microhardness values for undeformed and compressively deformed as-built, T6, and DA specimens at room and elevated temperatures. The compressively deformed specimens at room temperature show higher hardness values than the undeformed specimens under all three conditions. During the compression test at room temperature, the flow stress-strain curves display significant strain hardening behavior, which correlates with high hardness values. The hardness values increased sequentially up to 150 oC due to sustained flow stress and appropriate work hardening behavior, after which they gradually decreased for high-temperature compressively deformed specimens at 200 oC and 250 oC. Therefore, under high-temperature compression conditions, strain hardening is balanced by dynamic softening behavior (DRV and/or DRX). Overall, the DA specimens were observed to possess higher hardness than both the as-built and T6 specimens.

Fig. 4. Compression stress-strain curves of the as-built, T6 and DA specimens at different elevated temperatures.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig4.png

Fig. 5. Flow stress-strain curves of different temperatures (a) room temperature, (b) 150 oC (423K), (c) 200 oC (473K), and (d) 250 oC (523K).

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig5.png

Fig. 6. Compressive properties for as-built, T6 and DA specimens at different elevated temperatures.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig6.png

Table 1. Compressive properties of the as-built, T6 and DA specimens at different elevated temperatures.

Test conditions Temperature Yield Strength (YS) MPa Strain hardening exponent (n) Strength co-efficient (K) MPa
As-built RT 310 0.34 1513
423 273 0.30 808
473 252 0.23 587
523 186 0.22 457
T6 RT 187 0.36 909
423 170 0.29 450
473 95 0.24 327
523 67 0.23 224
DA RT 353 0.27 1490
423 286 0.24 824
473 260 0.20 721
523 193 0.21 503

Fig. 7. Vickers hardness values of the initial and deformed as-built, T6 and DA specimens at different temperatures.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig7.png

3.1.4 Microstructural evolution in the deformed specimens

3.1.4.1 Deformation behavior of compression tests at room temperature

To understand the influence of compressive deformation on the microstructural variation of the AlSi10Mg alloy, a series of compression test samples were characterized using optical microscopy. Typical optical microstructures of room-temperature compressively deformed specimens for the as-built, T6, and DA conditions are shown in Fig. 8(a), (b), and (c), respectively. In Fig. 8(a), the as-built deformed sample shows a flattened semi-elliptical melt pool shape (fish scale pattern) due to compression loading. After compression, the Si particles, which were crowded in the undeformed T6 specimens, become segregated in the deformed condition due to compressive deformation, as shown in Fig. 8(b). Additionally, the cracks in the deformed samples clearly propagate through the grain boundaries from one Si particle to another. Notably, the optical microstructures of the deformed specimens in transverse view for the as-built and DA samples show a clearly compressed form of semi-elliptical melt pools, as depicted in Fig. 8(a) and (c), respectively. In both conditions, the original grains/boundaries (melt pools) become elongated due to strain, but no visible cracks are observed.

To better understand the microstructural variations during compressive deformation, the as-built, T6, and DA specimens were further compared with undeformed specimens using FE-SEM images, as shown in Fig. 9. Fig. 9 (a)(b)(c) and (d)(e)(f) show the microstructural images of the as-built (a)(d), T6 (b)(e), DA (c)(f) specimens for undeformed and compressive deformed conditions, respectively. As mentioned earlier, in the as-built and DA specimens, the original grains/boundaries (melt pools) become elongated due to strain, but the sub-grains/boundaries remain more or less equiaxed, similar to the undeformed conditions. Notably, the extent of fine Si particles has relatively increased inside the cellular region of the compressively deformed as-built and DA specimens. Due to compression loading, an insignificant fine crack (circled in yellow) was observed on the cellular boundaries, as shown in Fig. 9(d) and (f). At higher magnification, the coarser Si particles in the T6 specimens appear significantly deformed, as indicated in Fig. 9(e). This also suggests the brittle nature of the coarser Si particles. Primarily, the impact of homogenization on changes in morphology (such as coarsening) is known to adversely affect the strength of the material. The higher compressive strength observed in direct aged conditions is attributed to the formation of fine-sized Si precipitates in the cellular structure.

Fig. 8. Typical optical microstructures of compressive deformed specimens at room temperature for as-built (a), T6 (b), and DA (c) conditions.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig8.png

Fig. 9. FE-SEM images of (a)(d) as-built, (b)(e) T6, and (c)(f) DA specimens for: (a)(b)(c) undeformed and (d)(e)(f) compressive deformed conditions.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig9.png

3.1.4.2 Deformation behavior of compression tests at different elevated temperatures

To understand the influence of temperature on compressive deformation and microstructural variation in the investigated specimens, a series of compression tests were performed at various temperatures using optical and FE-SEM analysis. Typical optical and FESEM microstructures of the deformed as-built specimens at different temperatures, 150 oC (423 K), 200 oC (473 K), and 250 oC (523 K), are shown in Fig. 10(a)(d), (b)(e), and (c)(f), respectively. Fig. 8(a) shows the micrograph of the as-built sample tested at room temperature, where deformed fine melt pool boundaries are observed. Fig. 10(a-c) shows the microstructures of the samples tested at elevated temperatures of 150 oC, 200 oC, and 250 oC, respectively. At these elevated temperatures, the microstructure did not show any significant changes compared to the room temperature sample. However, notable microstructural variations were observed at higher magnification. Fig. 10(d-f) shows the FE-SEM microstructures of the deformed as-built samples at 150 oC, 200 oC, and 250 oC, respectively. The Si particles became coarser as the deformation temperature increased from 150 oC to 250 oC, and this agglomeration is believed to be responsible for the reduced strength of the heat-treated samples.

Optical and FE-SEM microstructures of the deformed T6 specimens at different temperatures, 150 oC (423 K), 200 oC (473 K), and 250 oC (523 K), are shown in Fig. 11(a)(d), (b)(e), and (c)(f), respectively. High-temperature compressive deformation of T6 samples, near the recrystallization temperature, caused significant microstructural changes as shown in Fig. 11(f). Here, the precipitation of Si particles occurred and coalesced into large Si-rich agglomerates (circled in red). At elevated temperatures, the T6 specimens showed a significant reduction in flow stress and enhanced elongation. It has been reported that reduced solid-solution hardening, due to the precipitation and coarsening of Si particles with increasing temperature, leads to reduced strength.

Optical and FE-SEM microstructures of the deformed direct aged specimens at different temperatures, 150 oC (423 K), 200 oC (473 K), and 250 oC (523 K), are shown in Fig. 12(a)(d), (b)(e), and (c)(f), respectively. Ma et al.[53] suggested that a significant amount of Si exists in the Al phase, and provides a driving force for the growth of more Si particles. Fig. 12(d) shows the fine cellular structure of the DA samples at low temperature, consisting of a fine dispersion of Si particles along the cell boundaries and the Al-Si matrix. In Fig. 12(e) and (f), as the temperature increases, the fine Si particles become coarser and the cellular boundaries expand. This expansion of grain boundaries is more clearly visible, and the equiaxed cellular structure remains stable, unlike in the as-built conditions. The direct-aged specimens exhibit higher compressive strength than the as-built specimens because of the fine Si particles within the fine equiaxed cellular structure.

Illustrative ECCI images were taken to understand the substructural variation during compressive deformation at high temperatures. Fig. 13 shows the observed dislocation variations in the as-built and heat-treated specimens (T6 and DA) subjected to compression tests at room temperature and 250 oC. Fig. 13(a) shows the distribution of fine Si particles within the thin cellular region subjected to compressive deformation of the as-built specimen at room temperature. Moreover, Fig. 13(d) clearly shows that the denser dislocation pattern (marked in yellow) and the wider cellular boundaries (marked in red) in the high-temperature deformed specimens are more pronounced compared to those in the room temperature specimens. As mentioned in Section 3.3, in the high-temperature T6 specimen, the precipitated nano Si particles have coalesced into large Si-rich agglomerates, as shown in Fig. 13(e), which is not observed in Fig. 13(b).

Fig. 13(c) and (d) show the ECCI results for the high temperature deformed DA specimen, that confirm the presence of coarser Si particles and expanded cellular boundaries. In the high-temperature deformed DA specimen, a greater number of dislocations are distributed within the fine grain boundary matrix, and the equiaxed cellular structure remains stable, unlike the as-built conditions. This stability is attributed to the DA specimen having higher compressive strength compared to the other two specimens.

Fig. 10. Optical (a, b c) and FE-SEM (d, e, f) microstructures of compressive deformed as-built specimens at (a) (d) 150 oC, (b) (e) 200 oC, (c) (f) 250 oC different temperatures.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig10.png

Fig. 11. Optical (a, b c) and FE-SEM (d, e, f) microstructures of compressive deformed T6 specimens at (a) (d) 150 oC, (b) (e) 200 oC, (c) (f) 250 oC different temperatures.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig11.png

Fig. 12. Optical (a, b c) and FE-SEM (d, e, f) microstructures of compressive deformed direct aged specimens at (a) (d) 150 oC, (b) (e) 200 oC, (c) (f) 250 oC different temperatures.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig12.png

Fig. 13. ECCI images of deformed as-built (a)(d), T6 (b)(e), and DA (c)(f) specimens at room temperature (a) (b) (c) and 250 oC (d) (e) (f).

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig13.png

4. DISCUSSION

4.1 High-temperature compressive deformation mechanism

The EBSD analysis (Fig. 14) shows that the microstructure of the deformed materials at room temperature is inhomogeneous, featuring dynamically recrystallized small grains at the boundaries around deformed grains and nearly equiaxed sub-grains within these grains, indicating clear dynamic recovery (DRV). Depending on the temperature, either DRX (dynamic recrystallization), DRV, or both may be the dominant relaxation mechanisms. It is generally believed that DRV and DRX are the primary restoration mechanisms for metals and alloys during high-temperature compressive deformation. This restoration behavior results from the interaction between dislocations and particles or grain boundaries. The annihilation and nucleation of dislocations occur rapidly with increasing temperature during the DRV process[54].

For the as-built and DA conditions, the deformed elongated grain boundaries (melt pools) do not contain any new grains; instead, the cellular region exhibits the presence of sub-grains. These features can likely be attributed to dynamic recovery (DRV) processes occurring within the grain interior. The results indicate that the micro-mechanisms involved in dynamic recrystallization and recovery are complex and strongly influenced by deformation conditions. In materials with high stacking fault energy, cross-slip occurs. The arrangement of dislocations leads to numerous LAGBs (low grain angle boundaries) around the sub-grains that formed from the deformed cell structure, as shown in Fig. 14. The subsequent continuous rotation of sub-grains, upon further high-temperature deformation (250 oC), results in a progressive increase in misorientation, leading to the formation of HAGBs as indicated in Fig. 15. The grain exhibits twins, and the twin boundary loses the twin relation and transforms into HABs. Subsequently, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) grains are generated and homogeneously distributed, facilitated by parallel micro-bands and the rotation of sub-grains. This process is generally referred to as continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX)[55-57].

Fig. 14. EBSD and IPF analysis results of deformed as-built, T6 and DA specimens at room temperature.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig14.png

Fig. 15. EBSD and IPF analysis results of deformed as-built, T6 and DA specimens at high temperature 250 oC.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig15.png

4.1.1 Effect of strain

Fig. 16 illustrates the restoration mechanisms in the as-built, T6, and DA specimens during high-temperature compression. In all three conditions, distinct initial microstructures were observed: as-built—fine equiaxed cellular structure (primary Al-Si eutectic phase), T6—coarser Si particles (primary Si phase), and DA—fine equiaxed cellular structure with sub-grain Si particles (primary Al-Si eutectic phase and secondary Si particles), as shown in Fig. 9. It is well-established that incompatibility arises in the Al-Si matrix as strain increases. Si particles typically lead to a high density of dislocations accumulating around these sites; dislocation motion via climbing and sliding ultimately concentrates stress around these particles[58].

Three distinct interactions (I, II, and III) between particles and dislocations during the restoration mechanism are indicated in Fig. 16. For the as-built, T6, and DA conditions, dislocations accumulate rapidly during the initial stages of deformation (I). Subsequently, the dislocation density decreases significantly, and stress concentration is generally alleviated by dynamic recovery (DRV), leading to the formation of sub-grains within the deformed grains. Notably, submicron Si particles dispersed in the matrix exert a pinning effect on dislocation motion and grain boundary sliding (II). This pinning effect is crucial to impede both dislocation climb and sliding, and to facilitate the transformation from LAGBs (low angle grain boundaries) to HAGBs (high angle grain boundaries).

Additionally, the DRV/DRX process is effectively suppressed when the pinning force exceeds the driving force for grain boundary growth. At high strain, dislocations rapidly aggregate around irregular primary eutectic phases or secondary submicron Si particles, leading to highly concentrated stress at these sites (III). This concentrated stress makes dynamic recovery more challenging. Consequently, the irregular eutectic phases (cellular boundaries) or submicron particles are readily fragmented along the flow direction. This fragmentation of stress concentration promotes DRX. Given the relatively high stacking fault energy (SFE) of the material, the sub-grain boundaries in deformed Al alloys continuously absorb active dislocations. Ultimately, LAGBs transform into HAGBs, and sub-grains evolve into new DRX grains[57]. The dynamic restoration mechanism during deformation is significantly influenced by elevated temperatures. The final microstructures at different temperatures (150 oC, 200 oC, and 250 oC) can be schematically illustrated after the restoration process.

Fig. 16. Schematic illustration of DRV mechanisms during the high temperature compressive deformation process: (a) initial microstructure, (b) dislocation aggregated around particles, (c) restoration mechanisms of DRV and (d) microstructure after the deformation process..

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.237/fig16.png

4.1.2 Effect of temperature

It has been reported that at lower strain rates the size of sub-grains is strongly influenced by temperature[58]. As previously mentioned, dislocation density increases significantly, and interactions between dislocations reduce their mobility at room temperature. However, as the temperature rises, the annihilation and nucleation of dislocations become more facile. The sub-grain size for materials deformed at 250 oC is larger than those deformed at 150 oC and 200 oC.

During high-temperature deformation, the material undergoes deformation over an extended period, allowing sufficient time for the arrangement and annihilation of dislocations. This process leads to the formation of well-defined sub-grains, and the increased dislocation mobility at elevated temperatures results in larger sub-grains. Figure 16 provides a schematic representation of the substructural variations with varying temperatures for the as-built, T6, and DA conditions. Following the restoration mechanism at lower temperatures, the general final microstructure for the T6 specimen consists of sub-micron Si particles embedded within partially broken sub-grain boundaries (cellular structure), alongside coarser Si particles. The presence of fine Si particles in the homogeneous Al-Si equiaxed matrix contributes to the material's strength. At 200 oC, new sub-grain Si particles are generated in addition to the existing ones, resulting in coarser sub-grain Si particles and Al-Si equiaxed grain boundaries compared to lower temperatures. Notably, the grain boundaries become more fragmented with increasing temperature.

In contrast, in the indirect aged conditions, the sub-grains, and grain boundaries grew coarser without a fragmented equiaxed morphology. This may suggest that the existing fine Si particles in the direct aged specimens offer less resistance to the deformation (restricting further deformation/generation of dislocations). At the high temperature of 250 oC, the fine Si particles in the cellular region are agglomerated towards the grain boundaries and transformed into spherical shapes.

In the T6 specimen, the sub-grain nanoscale Si particles are agglomerated on the micro-scale Si particles. Thus, direct aging heat treatment, nucleation, and growth lead to a dense distribution of fine Si particles. However, pre-existing precipitates and finely spaced eutectic Al-Si phase matrix during the high-temperature compression after the deformation supports the growth of existing particles over the nucleation of new ones. Thus, we obtain a coarser distribution of nanoparticles.

However. at high temperature the DA specimen eutectic phase boundaries get coarser, maintaining the proper equiaxed morphology. This is also the reason high strength is retained, compared to the as-built specimen. It may mean that the presence of Si particles does not allow sufficient time for the arrangement and annihilation of dislocations and the fragmentation of cellular boundaries, even at high concentrated stress. The DA samples showed coarsening of existing precipitates and the eutectic cellular boundaries. The cell regions near the eutectic phase boundaries were depleted of particles, and while coarsened, most of the particles dominate the cell centers. These observations imply that large particles (in the cells and the eutectic phase boundary) coarsen at the expense of nano precipitates (Ostwald ripening) within the cell interiors during high-temperature deformation.

5. CONCLUSIONS

The high-temperature compressive deformation behavior of various heat-treated L-PBF AlSi10Mg alloys was studied within the temperature range of 423 K to 523 K at a strain rate of 10-3/s. Based on experimental observations, the following major conclusions can be drawn:

1) The compressive yield strength of the DA specimen was 342 MPa, compared to 320 MPa for the as-built specimen and 183 MPa for the T6 specimen. Thus, the direct-aged specimen exhibited higher compressive strength and hardness than both the as-built and T6 specimens. The high temperature compressive deformation behavior is significantly affected by the deformation temperature, i.e., the flow stress decreased with increasing temperature for all three conditions. In direct aging, accumulation of compressive strain was minimal, and dynamic softening occurred very rapidly, as the fine Si particles offer reduced resistance to further deformation.

2) Regarding microstructural evolution during high-temperature compression, the DA specimens retained long-term eutectic cellular structure stability, and fine Si particles, that enable high resistance to deformation. It maintained a stable microstructure capable of withstanding prolonged times even at elevated temperatures.

3)Dynamic recovery (DRV) is the main restoration mechanism. The annihilation and nucleation of dislocations take place with increasing temperature during the DRV process. The fine Si particles had a pinning effect on the motion of dislocations (climb and slide), which effectively hindered the transformation from LAGBs into HAGBs. The dynamic restoration mechanism occurred during the deformation, which is strongly influenced by the different elevated temperatures.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (NRF-2022R1A5A1030054 and NRF-RS-2023-00281508)

REFERENCES

1 
Olakanmi E. O., Cochrane R. F., Dalgarno K. W., Prog. Mater. Sci., 74, 401 (2015)DOI
2 
Choi S.-H., Sung S.-Y., Choi H.-J., Sohn Y.-H., Han B.-S., Lee K.-A., Procedia Eng., 10, 159 (2011)DOI
3 
Silbernagel C., Ashcroft I., Dickens P., Galea M., Addit. Manuf., 21, 395 (2018)DOI
4 
Thijs L., Kempen K., Kruth J.-P., Van Humbeeck J., Acta Mater., 61, 1809 (2013)DOI
5 
Wong K. K., Ho J. Y., Leong K. C., Wong T. N., Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 11, 159 (2016)DOI
6 
Aboulkhair N. T., Tuck C., Ashcroft I., Maskery I., Everitt N. M., Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 46, 3337 (2015)DOI
7 
Read N., Wang W., Essa K., Attallah M. M., Mater. Des., 65, 417 (2015)DOI
8 
Aboulkhair N. T., Maskery I., Tuck C., Ashcroft I., Everitt N. M., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 667, 139 (2016)DOI
9 
Herzog D., Seyda V., Wycisk E., Emmelmann C., Acta Mater., 117, 371 (2016)DOI
10 
Rosenthal I., Stern A., Frage N., Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal., 3, 448 (2014)DOI
11 
Jang J.-H., Kang T.-H., Euh K.-J., Cho Y.-H., Lee K.-A., Korean J. Met. Mater., 62, 402 (2024)DOI
12 
Son H.-W., Jeong J.-E., Cho Y.-H., Kim S.-B., Lee J.-M., Korean J. Met. Mater., 63, 197 (2025)Google Search
13 
Yu T., Hyer H., Sohn Y. H., Bai Y., Wu D., Mater. Des., 182, 108062 (2019)DOI
14 
Ceschini L., Morri A., Toschi S., Johansson S., Seifeddine S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 648, 340 (2015)DOI
15 
Zamani M., Seifeddine S., Jarfors A. E. W., Mater. Des., 86, 361 (2015)DOI
16 
Wei P., Wei Z., Chen Z., Du J., He Y., Li J., Zhou Y., Appl. Surf. Sci., 408, 38 (2017)DOI
17 
Hadadzadeh A., Amirkhiz B. S., Odeshi A., Li J., Mohammadi M., Addit. Manuf., 28, 1 (2019)DOI
18 
Hadadzadeh A., Baxter C., Amirkhiz B. S., Mohammadi M., Addit. Manuf., 23, 108 (2018)DOI
19 
Yang K. V., Rometsch P., Davies C., Huang A., Wu X., Mater. Des., 154, 275 (2018)Google Search
20 
Rao J. H., Zhang Y., Fang X., Chen Y., Wu X., Davies C. H. J., Addit. Manuf., 17, 113 (2017)Google Search
21 
Ma P., Prashanth K. G., Scudino S., Jia Y., Wang H., Zou C., Wei Z., Eckert J., Metals, 4, 28 (2014)DOI
22 
Prashanth K. G., Scudino S., Klauss H., Surreddi K. B., Lober L., Wang Z., Chaubey A. K., Kuhn U., Eckert J., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 590, 153 (2014)Google Search
23 
Bagherifard S., Beretta N., Monti S., Riccio M., Bandini M., Guagliano M., Mater. Des., 145, 28 (2018)DOI
24 
Hitzler L., Hirsch J., Heine B., Merkel M., Hall W., Ochsner A., Materials, 10, 1136 (2017)DOI
25 
Kunze K., Etter T., Grasslin J., Shklover V., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 620, 213 (2014)Google Search
26 
Wang D., Song C., Yang Y., Bai Y., Mater. Des., 100, 291 (2016)Google Search
27 
Rao H., Giet S., Yang K., Wu X., Davies C. H. J., Mater. Des., 109, 334 (2016)DOI
28 
Cao W. D., Kennedy R. L., Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Derivatives (E.A. Loria), 213-222, TMS (2005)Google Search
29 
Liu F., Yu F. X., Zhao D. Z., Zuo L. A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 528, 3786 (2011)Google Search
30 
Kimura T., Nakamoto T., Mater. Des., 89, 1294 (2016)DOI
31 
Hitzler L., Janousch C., Schanz J., Merkel M., Heine B., Mack F., Hall W., Öchsner A., J. Mater. Process. Technol., 243, 48 (2017)Google Search
32 
Kempen K., Thijs L., Van Humbeeck J., Kruth J.-P., Mater. Sci. Technol., 31, 917 (2014)Google Search
33 
Buchbinder D., Meiners W., Brandl E., Palm F., Müller-Lohmeier K., Wolter M., Over C., Moll W., Weber J., Skrynecki N., Abschlussbericht – Generative Fertigung von Aluminiumbauteilen für die Serienproduktion, 01RIO639A-D, BMBF, Fraunhofer ILT (2010)Google Search
34 
Manfredi D., Calignano F., Krishnan M., Canali R., Ambrosio E. P., Atzeni E., Materials, 6, 856 (2013)DOI
35 
Rao J.H., Rometsch P., Wu X., Davies C.H., Additive Manufacturing for the Aerospace Industry (F. Froes, R. Boyer), 143-161, Elsevier (2019)Google Search
36 
Zaretsky E., Stern A., Frage N., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 688, 364 (2017)DOI
37 
Zhang Y., Li R., Li X., Yang Y., Chen P., Dong F., Peng R., Metals, 8, 814 (2018)DOI
38 
Lin Y. C., Dong W. Y., Zhou M., Wen D. X., Chen D. D., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 718, 165 (2018)Google Search
39 
Deshpande A., Hsu K., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 711, 62 (2017)Google Search
40 
Huang C., Deng J., Wang S., Liu L., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 699, 106 (2017)Google Search
41 
Otto F., Frenzel J., Eggeler G., J. Alloys Compd., 509, 4073 (2011)DOI
42 
Wen D., Lin Y., Li H., Chen X., Deng J., Li L., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 591, 183 (2014)Google Search
43 
Cheng L., Chang H., Tang B., Kou H., Li J., J. Alloys Compd., 552, 363 (2013)DOI
44 
Liu L., Wu Y., Gong H., Liu S., Ahmad A., Materials, 11, 1443 (2018)DOI
45 
Ezatpour H. R., Sabzevar M. H., Sajjadi S. A., Huang Y., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 606, 240 (2014)DOI
46 
Yang Q. Y., Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 26, 649 (2016)DOI
47 
Asgharzadeh H., Simchi A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 542, 56 (2012)DOI
48 
Liu S. H., J. Mater. Sci., 54, 4366 (2019)Google Search
49 
Suzuki A., Adv. Eng. Mater., 21, 1900571 (2019)Google Search
50 
Baek M. S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 819, 141486 (2021)DOI
51 
Wang M. J., J. Alloys Compd., 820, 153325 (2020)DOI
52 
Zhang Z., Zhao W., Sun Q., Li C., J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 15, 19 (2006)Google Search
53 
Ma P., Metals, 4, 28 (2014)DOI
54 
Chaudhuri A., J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 28, 448 (2019)Google Search
55 
Wang B., J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 22, 2382 (2013)DOI
56 
Sakai T., Jonas J. J., Acta Metall., 32, 189 (1984)DOI
57 
Gubicza J., J. Alloys Compd., 378, 248 (2004)DOI
58 
Zhang Y., JOM, 72, 1638 (2020)DOI