The Journal of
the Korean Journal of Metals and Materials

The Journal of
the Korean Journal of Metals and Materials

Monthly
  • pISSN : 1738-8228
  • eISSN : 2288-8241

Editorial Office


  1. (Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju 52851, Republic of Korea)
  2. (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea)



Silver redox behavior, Glass structure, Zinc phosphate glass, Optical basicity

1. INTRODUCTION

Phosphate-based glasses (PBGs) have emerged as versatile platforms for biomedical and hygienic applications owing to their comparatively low processing temperatures, wide glass-forming compositional windows, and the ability to tune dissolution and ion-release profiles via network chemistry. These attributes enable scalable fabrication in fiber, particulate, and bulk forms while maintaining biocompatibility, and allow composition-tailored degradation at tissue interfaces for localized therapy[1-3]. Within this family, zinc-phosphate glasses are particularly attractive because ZnO acts as a tunable network modifier that adjusts durability and solubility, thereby providing a practical handle for controlling performance under aqueous and physiological conditions. In parallel, released Zn2+ itself exerts antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria through membrane disruption, enzyme interference, and reactive oxygen species pathways[4-6]. Consequently, zinc-phosphate glasses combine (i) robust manufacturability, (ii) adjustable release kinetics, and (iii) the intrinsic bioactivity of Zn2+, positioning them as strong candidates for antibacterial coatings, fillers, and fibers.

The role of alkaline-earth modifiers (RO = MgO, CaO, SrO, BaO) is central to engineering structure–property relationships in these glasses. Among them, Mg2+ possesses the smallest ionic radius and highest cation field strength, which enhances network connectivity and glass-transition temperature, and suppresses excessive depolymerization relative to heavier congeners, thereby improving thermal stability while offering a route to controlled ion release[7, 8]. This trend is rationalized within optical basicity/redox frameworks, where lower basicity and lower oxide-ion polarizability constrain the electron availability for the reduction of multivalent species. Mg-rich designs are therefore not expected to favor unwanted redox processes that could degrade optical or antibacterial performance[9, 10]. In zinc-phosphate systems, such chemistry-driven network reconfiguration by modifiers provides a predictive lever to balance durability, transparency, and therapeutic-ion delivery.

Silver oxide (Ag2O) doping remains a potent, antibiotic-free strategy to impart broad-spectrum antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy to glasses. Ag+ perturbs bacterial membranes, proteins, and nucleic acids, and has been shown to markedly reduce viable burdens in ex-vivo skin-wound biofilm models[11, 12]. A key practical liability, however, is the tendency of Ag+ to reduce to metallic Ag0 nanoparticles during melting/annealing or under light/thermal histories, generating surface-plasmon resonance near ~415 nm that causes yellowing, opacity, and batch-to-batch variability[13]. Moreover, conversion to Ag0 (or secondary insoluble phases) depletes the bioavailable Ag+ pool and can compromise long-term antibacterial persistence[14, 15]. Building on the foregoing structure–redox principles, the present work adopts an alkali-free, Mg-containing zinc-phosphate design to lower optical basicity, suppress electron donation by non-bridging oxygens (NBOs), and stabilize Ag+ as a charge-compensating species within the network. This approach mitigates Ag0 nucleation (and color-center formation) while maintaining controlled Ag+ release for sustained antibacterial action. In sum, by integrating the processability and tunable solubility of phosphate glasses with the antibacterial advantages of Zn2+/Ag+ and the high-field strength benefits of Mg2+ modifiers, we delineate a coherent materials strategy for transparent, durable, and clinically relevant antibacterial zinc-phosphate glasses.

2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

2.1 Glass preparation

Phosphate glasses with the composition of 2Ag2O–(14+x)ZnO–14MgO–(70-x)P2O5 (x = 0-18 mol%) were synthesized using high-purity raw materials, including Ag2O (DAEJUNG, 99.0%), ZnO (Thermo Scientific, 99.9%), MgO (Kojundo Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd., Japan, 99.0%) and NH4H2PO4 (DAEJUNG, 99.0%) powders. The chemical compositions of the prepared glasses are listed in Table 1. For each composition, 40 g of the batch materials were homogeneously mixed for 1 h using a 3D mixer. The blended powders were placed in Pt–Rh crucibles, melted in an electric furnace by heating to 1400 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, and held for 1 h to ensure complete fusion. The melts were then transferred to an annealing furnace and annealed at 575 °C (near Tg) for 1 h. Photographs of the synthesized glass samples are shown in Figure 1.

Table 1. Chemical compositions of glass samples

Abbreviation Ag2O (mol%) ZnO (mol%) MgO (mol%) P2O5 (mol%)
AZP_1 2 14 14 70
AZP_2 2 17 14 67
AZP_3 2 20 14 64
AZP_4 2 23 14 61
AZP_5 2 26 14 58
AZP_6 2 29 14 55
AZP_7 2 32 14 52
AZP_8 2 35 14 49

Fig. 1. Photograph of synthesized glass samples

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.229/fig1.png

2.2 Measurement and calculation methods

The amorphous states of the fabricated glasses were confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker), and their densities were measured using a gas pycnometer (Anton Paar). The optical transmittances of the glasses in the wavelength range of 200–1000 nm were evaluated using a UV–visible (vis) spectrophotometer (V-770, JASCO Corporation). The chemical states of the elements within the glass matrix were analyzed via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using binding energy spectra. Core-level peaks (e.g., O 1s) were fitted using a combination of Gaussian–Lorentzian functions. The binding energy scale was calibrated with reference to the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV. The thermal properties were evaluated by thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry (TG–DSC, HITACHI STA 200RV); the samples were heated up to 900 °C at 10 °C/min rate. The glass structure was analyzed using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR). FT-IR spectroscopy (Frontier, PerkinElmer) was performed in the wavenumber range of 400–1600 cm−1.

The atomic packing density, Cg was calculated using Equation (2), where Xi is the molar fraction of oxide i and Vi is the ionic volume of oxide i.

(2)
$C_g = \frac{\rho \Sigma_i (X_i V_i)}{M}$

The ionic volume Vi was determined using Equation (3), where NA is Avogadro’s number; m and n are the number of cations and oxygen atoms in the oxide AmOn, respectively; rA is the ionic radius of the cation; and rO is the ionic radius of the oxygen anion. The ionic radii were obtained from Shannon and Prewitt[7, 16].

(3)
$V_i = N_A \left( \frac{4}{3} \right) \pi (m r_A^3 + n r_O^3)$

The free volume was calculated using Equation (4) [17].

(4)
$Free volume = M_v \times (1 - C_g)$

In addition, we quantitatively evaluated the reducibility of silver in the glass by calculating its optical basicity, oxygen-ion polarizability, and ionicity/covalency. The theoretical optical basicity of multicomponent glass can be calculated based on the following equation proposed by Duffy and Ingram[9, 18]:

(5)
$\Lambda_{th} = X_1 \Lambda_1 + X_2 \Lambda_2 + \dots + X_n \Lambda_n$

where X1, X2, …, Xn are equivalent fractions based on the amount of oxygen each oxide contributes to the overall glass stoichiometry, and Λ1, Λ2, …, Λn are basicities assigned to the individual oxides[19].

The oxygen-ion polarizability, α0 2− was also calculated based on the optical basicity values, using Equation (6):

(6)
$\Lambda_{th} = 1.67 \left( 1 - \frac{1}{\alpha_O^{2-}} \right)$

According to this relationship, the increment in the value of α0 2− enhances the value of Λth.

The overall ionicity and covalency of the glass were calculated by first determining the ionicity of each constituent oxide, as follows (7) [20, 21]:

(7)
$f_{AB} = 1 - \exp \left[ -\frac{1}{4} (\chi_A - \chi_B)^2 \right]$

The fractional ionic character, fAB of two elements A and B was calculated according to Pauling’s algorithms described in Ref.[22], where ($\chi_A - \chi_B$) is a measure of the electronegativity difference between elements A and B[23].

Subsequently, the overall ionicity of the glass (Iglass) was determined using the following equation, where Xi represents the mole fraction of each oxide, and fi denotes the ionicity of each oxide, calculated based on the electronegativity differences between the constituent elements.

(8)
$I_{glass} = \Sigma_i X_i f_i$

The covalency of the glass (Cglass) was determined using Equation (9).

(9)
$C_{glass} = 1 - I_{glass}$

For each glass composition, five specimens were prepared for density measurements. All values are reported as averages.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Physical and thermal properties

XRD analysis (Figure 2) verified that every glass specimen was fully amorphous, displaying a broad diffuse halo and no resolvable Bragg peaks. A faint yellow tint was also noted, consistent with partial reduction of Ag+ to metallic Ag0; however, any nanoparticles formed are inferred to be too small for XRD detection. In line with this interpretation, Saad et al.[24] observed by TEM nearly spherical Ag nanoparticles of ~10–30 nm while the corresponding XRD patterns still indicated an amorphous phase. Likewise, Rahman[25] reported that Ag-NP–containing glasses retained amorphous profiles in XRD. Prior work has further analyzed the detectability of Ag0 by XRD as a function of nanoparticle size[26]. Taken together, the lack of silver reflections here is best explained by sub-critical particle dimensions, underscoring the strong size dependence of Ag diffraction features.

Table 2 summarizes the physical and thermal properties of the synthesized glasses. As P2O5 was progressively replaced by ZnO, both density and atomic packing density decreased approximately linearly, while the free volume increased. This trend indicates that the molar mass of the substituting oxide plays a decisive role in governing the bulk density: P2O5 (141.94 g/mol) is considerably heavier than ZnO (81.38 g/mol). The concurrent decrease in packing density and increase in free volume further suggest network depolymerization, consistent with replacing the network former (P2O5) with the network modifier (ZnO). Structurally, this substitution raises the fraction of non-bridging oxygens (NBOs), disrupts bridging linkages, and diminishes overall polymerization of the phosphate network. Thermal properties were evaluated using the glass transition temperature (Tg) and the dilatometric softening point (Td). Tg reflects the combined influence of oxide melting points, cation radii, field strength, and network connectivity; in the present system, the oxide melting points appear to dominate. Specifically, the much higher melting point of ZnO relative to P2O5 rationalizes the observed increases in both Tg and Td with increasing ZnO content[27].

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of the synthesized glass samples.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.229/fig2.png

Table 2. Physical and thermal properties of synthesized glass samples

Abbreviation Density (g/cm3) Cg (-) Free volume (cm3/mol) Tg (oC) Td (oC)
AZP_1 2.7483 0.6068 17.3145 575.6 628.7
AZP_2 2.7251 0.5926 17.8224 580.9 631.2
AZP_3 2.7192 0.5820 18.0489 587.2 633.9
AZP_4 2.7156 0.5715 18.2367 591.6 641.8
AZP_5 2.7154 0.5615 18.3705 598.7 650.3
AZP_6 2.7144 0.5510 18.5163 603.3 654.9
AZP_7 2.6877 0.5351 19.0497 608.2 656.2
AZP_8 2.6695 0.5207 19.4482 609.4 660.7

3.2 Ag redox behavior and optical properties

The UV–vis transmittance spectra of the glass samples are presented in Figure 3. As the ZnO content in the glass network increases, a pronounced decrease in transmission is observed near 415 nm, which is attributable to the surface-plasmon resonance (SPR) absorption of metallic Ag nanoparticles formed via extensive reduction of Ag+ [28, 29]. Notably, the Ag-reduction–related absorption feature disappears only in compositions containing ≤ 30 mol% ZnO. These results indicate that introducing ZnO at low levels is effective in suppressing the reduction of Ag⁺ within the glass network. On this basis, the present work identifies 30 mol% as an appropriate upper limit for the ZnO fraction that both enhances the antibacterial performance of zinc-phosphate glasses and mitigates undue reducibility, thereby defining an optimal compositional window for such materials.

The Ag 3d spectra exhibit a systematic shift toward the metallic Ag0 component with increasing ZnO content as shown in Figure 4. The pronounced trends in these optical properties—and their agreement with our complementary analyses—suggest that excessive ZnO loading increases the reducibility of Ag+, leading to reduced antibacterial efficacy and lowered optical transmittance; collectively, these effects may compromise the multifaceted applicability of these materials as antibacterial/optical glasses[30].

Fig. 3. UV–vis transmittance spectra of glass samples

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.229/fig3.png

Fig. 4. Ag 3d XPS profiles of glass samples

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.229/fig4.png

3.3 Structural properties

As the concentration of the network-modifier ZnO increased, the relative area of the NBO-related O 1s component grew, consistent with a larger population of NBOs (Figure 5)[27, 31]. Peak deconvolution corroborated this trend: the fraction of NBOs rose sharply with ZnO content, and at ~26 mol% ZnO the NBO/BO ratio exceeded unity. The deconvolution results, showing the ratio of NBO to BO, are presented in Table 3. Overall, the XPS results establish a positive correlation between NBO content and the formation of metallic Ag, indicating that NBO-rich, more ionic networks facilitate the reduction of Ag+ to Ag0. This supports the conclusion that the abundance of NBOs exerts a decisive influence on Ag redox behavior in phosphate-glass matrices.

To probe the structural characteristics of the glasses, FT-IR spectra were collected. As shown in Figure 6, distinct absorption bands were observed near 700, 900, and 1300 cm-1, each corresponding to specific vibrational units. The prominent peak around 700 cm-1 is assigned to the symmetric stretching of P–O–P linkages; the band near 900 cm-1 relates to their asymmetric stretching; and the broad feature centered at ~1300 cm-1 reflects the presence of P=O double-bond units within the glass network[32]. Notably, all bands shifted to lower wavenumbers with increasing ZnO content. These spectral changes indicate progressive depolymerization of the phosphate network, attributable to the generation of NBOs that disrupt P–O–P and P=O connectivity. This trend signifies a transition from a highly polymerized phosphate framework to a more depolymerized structure driven by the network-modifying action of the Zn2+ ions[33]. Consistent with this interpretation, glasses with higher ZnO exhibit a larger fraction of NBOs, whereas those with lower ZnO retain a higher fraction of BOs, reflecting the characteristic network-modifying role of Zn2+.

Optical basicity and oxide-ion polarizability were calculated using the oxide basicity values reported by Bordes-Richard et al.[34] (Table 4). Consistent with the UV–vis results, both metrics increased with ZnO content, indicating an enhanced tendency for Ag+→Ag0 reduction. This behavior accords with Duffy’s framework, in which lower basicity limits the availability of electrons for redox reactions, and it aligns with structural models that emphasize the chemistry-driven network reconfiguration induced by modifier ions in phosphate glasses. To clarify the structure–redox correlation further, we evaluated ionicity and covalency (Table 4). Glasses with lower ZnO contents exhibited lower ionic and higher covalent character than their higher-ZnO counterparts, implying the smallest NBO fraction and, consequently, the weakest driving force for Ag reduction[31, 35]. Taken together, these results rationalize the observed trend in Ag reduction through the combined effects of optical basicity, oxide-ion polarizability, and NBO content.

Our study indicates that the increasing ZnO content generates a larger fraction of non-bridging oxygens, which are more basic and electron-rich than bridging oxygens and can therefore donate electron density to Ag+ or stabilize excess negative charge around reduced Ag0 species, thereby lowering the energetic barrier for the Ag+ → Ag0 redox process. This interpretation is consistent with previous reports identifying NBO-rich environments as effective promoters of Ag+ reduction and nanoparticle formation in oxide glasses. As a result, the monotonic increase in NBO fraction (from FT-IR/XPS) and in optical basicity/ionicity with composition is not only a structural descriptor but also a direct indicator of the growing reducing power of the glass network[36-38]. However, the SPR minimum at ~415 nm does not necessarily follow this nearly linear NBO/optical-basicity trend, because the SPR response is governed not only by the total amount of reduced Ag0 but also by the size distribution and aggregation state of the Ag0 nanoparticles. Once silver reduction and clustering exceed a certain level, rapid growth and coalescence of Ag0 nanoparticles lead to a strong broadening and deepening of the SPR band, resulting in a disproportionate (non-linear) loss of transmittance near 415 nm[36-38].

Fig. 5. Deconvoluted O 1s XPS profiles of glass samples

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.229/fig5.png

Table 3. Quantitative ratios of NBO/BO obtained from peak deconvolution of the XPS spectra for selected glass samples

Abbreviation NBO BO
AZP_1 28.7 71.3
AZP_5 50.2 49.8
AZP_8 56.2 43.8

Fig. 6. FT-IR spectra of glass samples

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.3.229/fig6.png

Table 4. Calculated optical basicity/oxide ion polarizability and ionicity/covalency results of glass samples

Abbreviation Λth αo 2- Iglass Cglass
AZP_1 0.4982 1.4252 0.4072 0.5928
AZP_2 0.5168 1.4481 0.4140 0.5860
AZP_3 0.5354 1.4719 0.4208 0.5792
AZP_4 0.5540 1.4964 0.4277 0.5723
AZP_5 0.5726 1.5218 0.4345 0.5655
AZP_6 0.5912 1.5480 0.4413 0.5587
AZP_7 0.6098 1.5752 0.4482 0.5518
AZP_8 0.6284 1.6033 0.4550 0.5450

4. CONCLUSION

Systematic replacement of P2O5 by ZnO in 2Ag2O–(14+x)ZnO–14MgO–(70–x)P2O5 glasses produces a coherent evolution of properties. Density and atomic packing density decline linearly while free volume rises, evidencing network depolymerization, whereas Tg and Td increase, consistent with the higher melting point of ZnO. Ag reducibility intensifies, as shown by the emergence and strengthening of the ~415 nm SPR band, growth of the metallic component in Ag 3d XPS, and a ~26% higher Ag0 fraction at 35 mol% ZnO. O 1s XPS and FT-IR demonstrate that ZnO addition elevates the NBO population and shifts the network toward greater ionicity, which in turn facilitates Ag+ → Ag0 reduction. Calculated optical basicity and oxide-ion polarizability track these structural changes and provide quantitative support for the redox trend. Because excessive ZnO loading simultaneously diminishes optical transmittance and can lower the availability of antimicrobial Ag+, the data point to an effective compositional window with ZnO ≤ 30 mol% that suppresses undue reduction while preserving functional performance. These insights deliver a practical design rule linking modifier content to network topology, redox chemistry, and optical and functional outcomes in silver-bearing zinc-phosphate glasses.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (20026761, Independent Development of Special Glass Vum Manufacturing Technology for Biopharmaceuticals), funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea).

REFERENCES

1 
Neel E. A. A., Pickup D. M., Valappil S. P., Newport R. J., Knowles J. C., J. Mater. Chem., 19, 690 (2009)Google Search
2 
Ahmed I., Lewis M., Olsen I., Knowles J. C., Biomaterials, 25, 491 (2004)DOI
3 
Brauer D. S., Dissolution Behaviour of Phosphate Glasses, in Phosphate and Borate Bioactive Glasses, 25-43, Royal Society of Chemistry (2022)Google Search
4 
Takebe H., Baba Y., Kuwabara M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 352, 3088 (2006)DOI
5 
Massera J., Bourhis K., Petit L., Couzi M., Hupa L., Hupa M., Videau J. J., Cardinal T., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 74, 121 (2013)DOI
6 
Dadi R., Azouani R., Traore M., Mielcarek C., Kanaev A., Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 104, 109968 (2019)DOI
7 
Shannon R. D., Prewitt C. T., Acta Cryst. B, 25, 925 (1969)DOI
8 
Striepe S., Deubener J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 358, 1480 (2012)DOI
9 
Duffy J. A., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 57, 3961 (1993)DOI
10 
Metwalli E., Brow R. K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 289, 113 (2001)DOI
11 
Wilkinson H. N., Iveson S., Catherall P., Hardman M. J., Front. Microbiol., 9, 1450 (2018)Google Search
12 
Valappil S. P., Pickup D. M., Carroll D. L., Hope C. K., Pratten J., Newport R. J., Smith M. E., Wilson M., Knowles J. C., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 51, 4453 (2007)DOI
13 
Hwang J., Kim H., Kim S., Roh J., Korean J. Met. Mater., 62, 464 (2024)DOI
14 
Takeda S., Yamamoto K., Matsumoto K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 265, 133 (2000)DOI
15 
Levard C., Reinsch B. C., Michel F. M., Oumahi C., Lowry G. V., Brown G. E., Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 5260 (2011)DOI
16 
Rosales-Sosa G. A., Masuno A., Higo Y., Inoue H., Sci. Rep., 6, 23620 (2016)Google Search
17 
Welter T., Marzok U., Deubener J., Reinsch S., Müller R. D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 521, 119502 (2019)DOI
18 
Bach H., Baucke F. K. G., Krause D., Electrochemistry of Glasses and Glass Melts, Including Glass Electrodes, 1-468, Springer (2001)Google Search
19 
Dimitrov V., Komatsu T., J. Univ. Chem. Technol. Metall., 45, 219 (2010)Google Search
20 
Pauling L., J. Chem. Educ., 69, 519 (1992)DOI
21 
Abdel-Wahaba F. A., Fayadb A. M., Abdel-Bakib M., Maksoud H. A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 500, 84 (2018)DOI
22 
Lenglet M., Act. Passiv. Electron. Compon., 27, 1 (2004)Google Search
23 
Xiao Y., Du T., Sørensen S. S., Chen Z., Biscio C. A. N., Fajstrup L., Bauchy M., Smedskjaer M. M., Phys. Rev. Mater., 7, 065602 (2023)Google Search
24 
Saad M., Stambouli W., Mohamed S. A., Elhouichet H., J. Alloys Compd., 705, 550 (2017)DOI
25 
Rahman I. A., Ayob M. T. M., Mohd H. M. K., Ahmad A. F., Sharin S., Mohamed F., Aziz S. A., Radiman S., Malays. J. Anal. Sci., 20, 64 (2016)Google Search
26 
Granbohm H., Larismaa J., Ali S., Johansson L. S., Hannula S. P., Materials, 11, 80 (2018)Google Search
27 
Brow R. K., Tallant D. R., Meyers S. T., Phifer C. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 191, 45 (1995)DOI
28 
Lee S., Hwang S., Cha M., Shin H., Kim H., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 69, 1498 (2008)DOI
29 
Mai H. H., Kaydashev V. E., Tikhomirov V. K., Janssens E., Shestakov M. V., Meledina M., Turner S., Van Tendeloo G., Moshchalkov V. V., Lievens P., J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 15995 (2014)DOI
30 
Kim J., Kim Y., Choi J., Lee Y., Kong Y., Kim D., Korean J. Met. Mater., 62, 735 (2024)Google Search
31 
Grammes T., de Ligny D., Mathew D., Griebenow K., Scheffler F., Lindner F., Aichele C., Dellith J., van Wüllen L., Kamitsos E. I., Brauer D. S., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 26, 13826 (2024)DOI
32 
Reddy G. N. K., Sekhar A. V., Pavić L., Bafti A., Pisk J., Reddy A. S. S., Venkatramaiah N., Raju G. N., Kumar V. R., Veeraiah N., Appl. Phys. A, 129, 208 (2023)Google Search
33 
Marzouk M. A., ElBatal H. A., Hamdy Y. M., Ezz-Eldin F. M., Int. J. Opt., 2019, 6527327 (2019)Google Search
34 
Bordes-Richard E., Courtine P., Optical Basicity: A Scale of Acidity/Basicity of Solids and Its Application to Oxidation Catalysis, in Metal Oxides: Chemistry and Applications, 319-352, CRC Press (2006)Google Search
35 
Novatski A., Steimacher A., Medina A. N., Bento A. C., Baesso M. L., Andrade L. H. C., Lima S. M., Guyot Y., Boulon G., J. Appl. Phys., 104, 094910 (2008)Google Search
36 
Simo A., Polte J., Pfänder N., Vainio U., Emmerling F., Rademann K., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 18824 (2012)DOI
37 
Kipke A., Hofmeister H., Mater. Chem. Phys., 111, 254 (2008)DOI
38 
Shaaban M. H., Mahmoud K. R., Sharshar T., Ahmed A. A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 258, 352 (2007)DOI