하성훈
(Sung-Hun Ha)
1,†
김준혁
(Jun-Hyeok Kim)
2,3,†
김종만
(Jong-Man Kim)
2,3,4,*
-
한국재료연구원 융복합재료연구본부
(Composites & Convergence Materials Research Division, Korea Institute of Materials
Science, Changwon 51508, Republic of Korea)
-
부산대학교 나노융합기술학과
(Department of Nano Fusion Technology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic
of Korea)
-
부산대학교 BK21 FOUR 에너지융합기술교육연구단
(BK21 FOUR Education and Research Division for Energy Convergence Technology, Pusan
National University, Busan 46214, Republic of Korea)
-
부산대학교 첨단융합학부, 에너지기술연구소, 휴머노이드 후각디스플레이센터
(School of Transdisciplinary Engineering, Research Center of Energy Convergence Technology,
and Humanoid Olfactory Display Innovation Research Center, Pusan National University,
Busan 46214, Republic of Korea)
Copyright © The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Keywords
Conductive fabric heater, Superhydrophobicity, Low-voltage operation, Hierarchical surface roughness
1. INTRODUCTION
Over the past few decades, flexible electrothermal heaters have attracted considerable
attention owing to their broad range of potential applications, including thermochromic
displays[1,
2], thin-film defrosters[3-
8], wearable thermotherapy systems[8-
11], biomedical and prosthetic devices[12,
13], and flexible gas sensors[14,
15]. In particular, with the growing demand for efficient point-of-care solutions, body-attachable
heaters have emerged as a promising platform for smart healthcare applications. For
such applications, heaters must be sufficiently breathable to permit efficient moisture
transport from the skin and highly deformable to conform to human body movements during
wear. Therefore, conductive fabrics have recently emerged as promising candidates
for skin-mountable heating platforms owing to their unique mesh geometry featuring
uniformly distributed conductive fibers and pores, lightweight nature, and conformal
integration with the human body[16,
17,
19-
22].
Insulating fabrics have previously been conformally coated with carbon nanotubes (CNTs)
via a facile dip-coating process to fabricate wearable heaters[16,
17]. Despite the simple, rapid fabrication, CNT-coated fabric heaters still require relatively
high operating voltages. For example, an input voltage as high as 15–20 V is required
to achieve a temperature of ~50 °C, which substantially limits their practical applicability
in mobile wearable systems. This limitation is presumably attributed to the high contact
resistance at CNT–CNT junctions[18].
Silver nanowires (AgNWs) have emerged as attractive alternatives to CNTs for fabricating
low-voltage fabric heaters owing to their superior electrical and thermal conductivities[17,
19,
20]. Notably, AgNW-based heaters require input voltages as low as 3 V to reach temperatures
of ~40 °C. Carbonization of fabrics through facile thermal treatment has also been
proposed as an effective approach for fabricating low-voltage fabric heaters, enabling
operating temperatures exceeding 100 °C at an input voltage of 3 V[21].
In another approach, polymeric microfibers were sequentially coated with copper nanowires
and a protective rubber layer, followed by weaving into a mesh structure[22]. The resulting fabric heaters reached temperatures as high as 57 °C under an input
voltage of 3 V while maintaining excellent breathability and mechanical stability.
Electroless deposition techniques have also been employed to fabricate conductive
fabric heaters[23,
24]. Following a subsequent hydrophobic treatment, the conductive fabric exhibited a
high static contact angle (SCA) of 158° while preserving its low-voltage heating performance,
reaching a temperature of ~73.4 °C at an input voltage of only 0.5 V.
However, most previously reported fabric heaters inevitably rely on cumbersome and
time-consuming fabrication processes, presenting a major obstacle to their practical
implementation in wearable systems. In this study, we present a simple yet highly
efficient strategy for fabricating conductive superhydrophobic fabric mesh heaters
by combining facile dip-coating of highly conductive AgNWs with conformal vapor deposition
of a thin polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) overlayer.
The resulting AgNW/PDMS-coated fabric mesh (APFM) heater combines several desirable
features, including low-voltage operation (~70.1 °C at 1.2 V), robust superhydrophobicity
(SCA > 150°, contact angle hysteresis (CAH) < 10°, excellent water repellency, and
a sliding angle < 10°), high breathability, and a cost-effective, straightforward
fabrication process, establishing it as a promising platform for highly efficient
electrothermal heating applications.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 AgNW synthesis
AgNWs were synthesized using a copper(II) chloride (CuCl2)-mediated one-pot polyol method. First, 200 mL of ethylene glycol (EG) was heated
at 170 °C under magnetic stirring at 1000 rpm for 1 h. Subsequently, 0.8 mL of 10
mM CuCl2 solution was added to the heated EG, and the resulting mixture was maintained under
identical conditions for an additional 15 min. Solutions of 0.22 mM polyvinylpyrrolidone
(PVP; 60 mL) and 91.1 mM silver nitrate (AgNO3; 60 mL), both prepared in EG, were then simultaneously introduced into the CuCl2/EG mixture using a dual-channel syringe pump (Legato 111, KD Scientific). The resulting
mixture was maintained at 170 °C for 1 h to facilitate AgNW growth. Finally, the synthesized
AgNWs were purified via repeated centrifugation at 3000 rpm using acetone and ethanol
as washing solvents. To prepare the coating suspension, the purified AgNWs were redispersed
in ethanol at a concentration of 2 mg mL-1.
2.2 Device fabrication
To fabricate the APFM, a woven fabric mesh was coated with the synthesized AgNWs.
Specifically, 30 mL of the AgNW coating suspension was poured into a container holding
the pristine fabric mesh oriented face-up. The sample was dried under ambient conditions
until complete solvent evaporation, yielding an AgNW network on the mesh surface.
This coating procedure was repeated several times to achieve the desired electrical
conductivity. Subsequently, the AgNW-coated fabric mesh was coated with PDMS, excluding
the probe electrode regions, by sequentially vaporizing the PDMS prepolymer and curing
agent (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) in a convection oven at 200 °C for 1 h. Finally,
electrical lead wires were connected to the probe electrodes using conductive epoxy
for electrical characterization.
2.3 Characterization
Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; S4700, Hitachi) was employed
to examine the surface morphologies of the pristine and coated meshes. A contact angle
goniometer (DSA 20E, KRÜSS) was used to evaluate surface wettability. The electrical
resistance ($R$) of the conductive meshes was measured using a digital multimeter
(34465A, Keysight Technologies). The sheet resistance ($R_s$) of the APFM was determined
via $R_s = R \times (W/L)$, where $W$ and $L$ denote the width and the distance between
the two probe electrodes, respectively. A DC power supply (K1205, Vupower) provided
the input voltage to the APFM heater. The electrothermal performance was evaluated
by recording the temperature profiles as a function of applied voltage using an infrared
thermal camera (T630sc, FLIR). Sheet resistance and steady-state temperature measurements
were performed on at least three independently fabricated devices. Wetting properties
were measured at least three times per specimen. All measured values are reported
as the mean ± standard deviation.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The superhydrophobic APFM was fabricated via a facile two-step coating route, as schematically
illustrated in Fig. 1(a). Figs. 1(b)–(d) display top-view SEM images of the fabric mesh in its pristine state, following AgNW
dip-coating, and after subsequent PDMS vapor deposition, respectively. The pristine
mesh consists of periodically woven fibers forming regularly distributed open pores
(Fig. 1(b)). Following five dip-coating cycles, the woven framework was uniformly and densely
covered with an interconnected AgNW percolation network (Fig. 1(c)), indicating high electrical conductivity. The AgNW network remained intact without
noticeable morphological degradation after the PDMS vapor coating process (Fig. 1(d)). Crucially, the two-step coating process preserved the original open-pore architecture
of the woven mesh, verifying the conformal nature of the deposition.
Fig. 1. Fabrication of the AgNW/PDMS-coated fabric mesh (APFM). (a) schematic illustration
of the fabrication sequence, and top-view SEM images of the fabric mesh (b) in its
pristine state, (c) after the AgNW dip-coating, and (d) after the PDMS coating, scale
bars: 500 µm (inset: magnified SEM images for each case, scale bars: 50 µm).
The electrical properties of the APFM were modulated by controlling the number of
AgNW dip-coating cycles. Fig. 2(a) presents the sheet resistance ($R_s$) of the APFM as a function of coating cycles.
As shown in Fig. 2(a), the $R_s$ decreased monotonically with increasing coating cycles, which is attributed
to the formation of an increasingly dense AgNW percolation network. After five dip-coating
cycles, a minimum $R_s$ of 1.4 ± 0.04 Ω sq-1 was achieved. Furthermore, increasing the AgNW density effectively reduced sample-to-sample
variations in $R_s$, with the standard deviation decreasing from ~2.3 Ω sq-1 after a single cycle to ~0.04 Ω sq-1 after five cycles. These results confirm that the dense AgNW network provides both
superior electrical conductivity and high process reproducibility.
Fig. 2. Sheet resistance (Rs) measurement. (a) Rs of the fabric mesh as a function of the number of AgNW dip-coating cycles and (b)
comparison of Rs values of the five-cycle coated fabric mesh before and after the PDMS coating.
Fig. 2(b) compares the $R_s$ of the five-cycle coated sample before and after PDMS vapor deposition.
The $R_s$ further decreased to 1.2 ± 0.07 Ω sq-1 (from 1.4 ± 0.04 Ω sq-1) after PDMS coating. This reduction is attributed to the conformal PDMS overlayer,
which mechanically constrains the AgNW percolation network, thereby expanding the
effective contact area between adjacent AgNWs and reducing junction contact resistance.
The surface wetting properties of the APFM were characterized by measuring the static
contact angle (SCA) and contact angle hysteresis (CAH). Superhydrophobicity is conventionally
defined by an SCA exceeding 150° and a CAH below 10°[25]. Fig. 3(a) compares the SCA values of three different surfaces: a PDMS-coated flat substrate
(flat PDMS), a PDMS-coated fabric mesh (PFM), and the APFM. Photographs of water droplets
on each surface are shown in the inset of Fig. 3(a).
Fig. 3. Static contact angle (SCA) of the APFM. (a) SCAs measured on different surface
models: flat PDMS, PFM, and APFM (inset: digital images of water droplets sitting
on the respective surface models) and (b) uniformity of SCA for each surface model.
The flat PDMS exhibited an SCA of 105.7 ± 0.3°, consistent with the intrinsically
low surface energy of PDMS[26]. This indicates that PDMS vapor deposition is an effective method for hydrophobizing
various substrates. When PDMS was coated onto the pristine fabric mesh, the resulting
PFM exhibited an increased SCA of 141.7 ± 0.7°. This enhancement occurs because the
microscale roughness of the woven mesh promotes a stable Cassie–Baxter wetting state
by trapping air within the open pores, thereby minimizing the solid–liquid contact
area[27,
28].
The incorporation of the AgNW network between the mesh substrate and the PDMS overlayer
introduced nanoscale roughness, generating hierarchical micro/nanostructures that
trap additional air at the solid–liquid interface. Consequently, the APFM exhibited
an exceptional SCA of 154 ± 2.2°. Furthermore, all surface models displayed uniform
wetting characteristics across their entire surfaces (Fig. 3(b)). The variation among average SCA values measured at five distinct locations (top,
bottom, center, left, and right) on the APFM was within ~2.6°, confirming structural
and chemical uniformity across the entire mesh.
Dynamic wetting behavior was investigated by evaluating the CAH, defined as the difference
between advancing and receding contact angles. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the flat PDMS exhibited a CAH of 31.5 ± 0.5°, in agreement with literature values[29,
30]. In contrast, the APFM exhibited a markedly lower CAH of 6.1 ± 0.1°, representing
an ~80.6% reduction compared to flat PDMS. This low CAH is attributed to the hierarchical
surface roughness, which stably traps air beneath the droplet, drastically lowering
both the solid–liquid contact area and the droplet adhesion force.
Fig. 4. Contact angle hysteresis (CAH) of the APFM. (a) CAHs measured on the flat
PDMS and APFM and (b) sequential snapshots of a water droplet released onto the ~10°-inclined
APFM from a height of ~30 mm, scale bar: 10 mm.
Because the CAH of the APFM was well below 10°, droplets rolled and bounced freely
off the surface. To examine this dynamic behavior, a 10 µL water droplet was dropped
from a height of ~30 mm onto an APFM inclined at ~10°. As shown in the sequential
snapshots in Fig. 4(b), the droplet rebounded completely upon impact without droplet breakup or surface
wetting. Following initial impact, the droplet underwent a secondary bounce and transitioned
smoothly into rolling at 162 ms, completely rolling off the surface within 216 ms.
This confirms the superior dynamic superhydrophobicity and low roll-off resistance
of the APFM.
The APFM was subsequently evaluated as a low-voltage electrothermal heater. Fig. 5(a) displays the time-dependent temperature profiles of the APFM heater at applied voltages
from 0.3 to 1.2 V in 0.3 V intervals. Upon voltage application, the heater temperature
rose rapidly, reaching a steady-state value within seconds. When the voltage was turned
off, the temperature rapidly returned to ambient levels, demonstrating rapid thermal
response and operational stability over repeated cycles.
Fig. 5. Joule heating performance of the APFM heater. (a) time-dependent temperature
profiles of the device at applied voltages ranging from 0.3 to 1.2 V and (b) steady-state
temperature (Tss) as a function of applied voltage.
Fig. 5(b) plots the steady-state temperature ($T_{ss}$) as a function of applied voltage. A
maximum $T_{ss}$ of 70.1 ± 11.5 °C was attained at an operating voltage of only 1.2
V, highlighting the remarkable low-voltage heating capability of the APFM. Although
minor device-to-device temperature variations were observed due to localized AgNW
density variations, $T_{ss}$ demonstrated strong linear dependence on the applied
voltage ($R^2 \approx 0.993$). This linearity facilitates predictable and precise
temperature control by adjusting the input voltage.
These findings demonstrate that the APFM heater is well-suited for portable and wearable
thermotherapy applications. In particular, combining low-voltage operation with robust
superhydrophobicity enables reliable, safe performance in humid or wet environments.
4. CONCLUSIONS
In summary, a low-voltage-driven superhydrophobic heater was successfully developed
using a highly conductive, hierarchically roughened fabric mesh (APFM). The APFM was
fabricated via sequential AgNW dip-coating and PDMS vapor deposition. The resulting
mesh demonstrated outstanding electrical conductivity ($R_s = 1.2 \pm 0.07\ \Omega\
\text{sq}^{-1}$) and robust superhydrophobicity (SCA = 154 ± 2.2°, CAH = 6.1 ± 0.1°,
and sliding angle < 10°). Operated as an electrothermal heater, the device reached
a steady-state temperature of 70.1 ± 11.5 °C at an input voltage of only 1.2 V with
excellent linearity ($R^2 \approx 0.993$). These results establish the APFM as an
efficient, waterproof platform for next-generation wearable and skin-attachable thermotherapy
devices.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by a 2-Year Research Grant of Pusan National University.
REFERENCES
P. Liu, L. Liu, K. Jiang, S. Fan,
Small 7, 732 (2011).

D. Kim, L. Zhu, D.-J. Jeong, K. Chun, Y.-Y. Bang, S.-R. Kim, J.-H. Kim, S.-K. Oh,
Carbon 63, 530 (2013).

H.-S. Jang, S. K. Jeon, S. H. Nahm,
Carbon 49, 111 (2011).

J. Li, J. Liang, X. Jian, W. Hu, J. Li, Q. Pei,
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 299, 1403 (2014).

J.-G. Lee, J.-H. Lee, S. An, D.-Y. Kim, T.-G. Kim, S. S. Al-Deyab, A. L. Yarin, S.
S. Yoon,
J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 6677 (2017).

H.-J. Kim, Y. Kim, J.-H. Jeong, J.-H. Choi, J. Lee, D.-G. Choi,
J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 16621 (2015).

H. S. Jo, S. An, J.-G. Lee, H. G. Park, S. S. Al-Deyab, A. L. Yarin, S. S. Yoon,
NPG Asia Mater. 9, e347 (2017).

B. W. An, E.-J. Gwak, K. Kim, Y.-C. Kim, J. Jang, J.-Y. Kim, J.-U. Park,
Nano Lett. 16, 471 (2016).

S. Choi, J. Park, W. Hyun, J. Kim, J. Kim, Y. B. Lee, C. Song, H. J. Hwang, J. H.
Kim, T. Hyeon, D.-H. Kim,
ACS Nano 9, 6626 (2015).

N.-S. Jang, K.-H. Kim, S.-H. Ha, S.-H. Jung, H. M. Lee, J.-M. Kim,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 19612 (2017).

A. M. Hussain, E. B. Lizardo, G. A. T. Sevilla, J. M. Nassar, M. M. Hussain,
Adv. Healthcare Mater. 4, 665 (2015).

D. Son, J. Lee, S. Qiao, R. Ghaffari, J. Kim, J. E. Lee, C. Song, S. J. Kim, D. J.
Lee, S. W. Jun, S. Yang, M. Park, J. Shin, K. Do, M. Lee, K. Kang, C. S. Hwang, N.
Lu, T. Hyeon, D.-H. Kim,
Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 397 (2014).

J. Kim, M. Lee, H. J. Shim, R. Ghaffari, H. R. Cho, D. Son, Y. H. Jung, M. Soh, C.
Choi, S. Jung, K. Chu, D. Jeon, S.-T. Lee, J. H. Kim, S. H. Choi, T. Hyeon, D.-H.
Kim,
Nat. Commun. 5, 5747 (2014).

H. Choi, J. S. Choi, J.-S. Kim, J.-H. Choe, K. H. Chung, J.-W. Shin, J. T. Kim, D.-H.
Youn, K.-C. Kim, J.-I. Lee, S.-Y. Choi, P. Kim, C.-G. Choi, Y.-J. Yu,
Small 10, 3685 (2014).

M. W. Jung, S. Myung, W. Song, M.-A Kang, S. H. Kim, C.-S. Yang, S. S. Lee, J. Lim,
C.-Y. Park, J.-O Lee, K.-S. An,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 13319 (2014).

P. Ilanchezhiyan, A. S. Zakirov, G. Mohan Kumar, Sh. U. Yuldashev, H. D. Cho, T. W.
Kang, A. T. Mamadalimov,
RSC Adv. 5, 10697 (2015).

P.-C. Hsu, X. Liu, C. Liu, X. Xie, H. R. Lee, A. J. Welch, T. Zhao, Y. Cui,
Nano Lett. 15, 365 (2015).

A. Buldum, J. P. Lu,
Phys. Rev. B 63, 161403 (2001).

Y. Guo, K. Li, C. Hou, Y. Li, Q. Zhang, H. Wang,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 4676 (2016).

D. Doganay, S. Coskun, S. P. Genlik, H. E. Unalan,
Nanotechnology 27, 435201 (2016).

M. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Liang, Z. Yin, K. Xia, H. Wang, M. Jian, Y. Zhang,
Adv. Electron. Mater. 3, 1700193 (2017).

Y. Cheng, H. Zhang, R. Wang, X. Wang, H. Zhai, T. Wang, Q. Jin, J. Sun,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 32925 (2016).

Y. Bai, F. Qin, Y. Lu,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 48016 (2020).

T.-B. Yang, J.-Y. Zong, D.-Z. Jia, L. Xu, Y.-Y. Wang, L.-C. Jia, D.-X. Yan, J. Lei,
Z.-M. Li,
Chem. Eng. J. 489, 151360 (2024).

L. Feng, S. Li, Y. Li, H. Li, L. Zhang, J. Zhai, Y. Song, B. Liu, L. Jiang, D. Zhu,
Adv. Mater. 14, 1857 (2002).

L. Hauer, A. Naga, R. G. M. Badr, J. T. Pham, W. S. Y. Wong, D. Vollmer,
Soft Matter 20, 5273 (2024).

S. Michielsen, H. J. Lee,
Langmuir 23, 6004 (2007).

S. Shukla, Y. Wen, I. Szenti, A. Kukovecz, T. C. Sykes, R. Jervis, A. Rawal,
Mater. Des. 258, 114519 (2025).

W. S. Y. Wong, L. Hauer, A. Naga, A. Kaltbeitzel, P. Baumli, R. Berger, M. D’Acunzi,
D. Vollmer, H.-J. Butt,
Langmuir 36, 7236 (2020).

D.-W. Jeong, S.-J. Kim, J.-K. Park, S.-H. Kim, D.-W. Lee, J.-M. Kim,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 2770 (2014).
