Nucleation Rate Governs Crystal Quality in 100 g-Scale Aqueous Synthesis of ZIF-Based
MOFs for Semi-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries
(Jiwoo Yoon)
1
(Sangbaek Park)
1,*
-
(Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon
34134, Republic of Korea)
Copyright © The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Keywords
Metal-organic frameworks, Aqueous synthesis, Large-batch synthesis, Semi-solid-state electrolytes, Lithium metal batteries
1. INTRODUCTION
Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) have attracted significant attention as next-generation
energy-storage systems owing to their high theoretical energy density[1,
2]. However, conventional liquid-electrolyte-based LMBs suffer from safety concerns
and rapid capacity degradation associated with continuous Li dendrite growth and undesirable
electrolyte side reactions[1,
2,
6]. To address these limitations, semi-solid-state electrolytes (SSSEs) based on metal–organic
frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as a promising strategy[3-
6]. Owing to their highly ordered porous structures, large specific surface areas, and
tunable chemical environments, MOFs can serve as effective hosts for liquid electrolytes
while providing ion-transport pathways[3,
6-
8]. In particular, ZIF-based materials possess well-defined microporous structures with
an average pore diameter of less than 0.5 nm, which is suitable for accommodating
electrolyte species and regulating Li-ion transport[3-
5,
7]. Despite these advantages, translating MOF-based SSSEs toward practical battery applications
remains challenging because sufficiently large quantities of structurally uniform
and highly porous MOFs must be produced without sacrificing material quality[8-
10].
The large-batch production of MOFs involves challenges that are distinct from those
encountered in small-scale laboratory synthesis[9,
10]. From a processing perspective, conventional MOF syntheses often rely on organic
solvents, which can increase the requirements for solvent handling, recovery, and
waste treatment as the production scale increases[9-
11]. Aqueous synthesis is therefore particularly attractive for large-batch preparation
as a green chemistry approach because it reduces dependence on organic solvents and
offers a simpler processing route[11-
13]. Meanwhile, increasing the batch size alone does not guarantee the formation of high-quality
MOF crystals[9,
10,
13]. Crystal formation is fundamentally governed by nucleation and subsequent crystal
growth, which are sensitive to precursor concentration, mixing, local supersaturation,
and precursor-delivery conditions[12-
17]. As the batch size increases, these parameters can become increasingly difficult
to maintain uniformly throughout the reaction system[9,
10]. Therefore, understanding how nucleation and crystal growth proceed during large-batch
synthesis is essential for obtaining uniform and highly crystalline MOFs.
In this study, we developed an aqueous large-batch synthesis strategy for ZIF-based
MOFs by controlling the precursor feeding time as a key processing parameter governing
the nucleation rate and subsequent crystal growth. By comparing long and short feeding
times under large-batch conditions, we identified a clear relationship between the
feeding condition and the resulting crystal quality. A short feeding time promoted
rapid nucleation followed by more uniform crystal growth, whereas a long feeding time
slowed nucleation and generated irregular particles, identifying the nucleation rate
as the factor that preserves crystal uniformity during large-batch aqueous synthesis.
Inspired by this finding, our synthesis strategy was further extended to a Cu/Zn bimetallic
ZIF-based framework, which likewise produced uniform faceted crystals and confirmed
that the nucleation–growth relationship established for ZIF-8 also holds for a compositionally
modified MOF system. The resulting ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOFs retained their microporous
structures after fabrication into separators, hosted the liquid electrolyte within
their pores, and supported stable ion transport and reversible Li plating/stripping.
These findings identify the precursor feeding rate as a simple and readily transferable
design parameter for producing high-quality ZIF-based MOFs at scale without additional
reactor modifications or organic solvents.
2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
2.1. Materials and MOF synthesis
2-Methylimidazole (2-MIM), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), zinc acetate
dihydrate, copper acetate monohydrate, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide
(LiTFSI), propylene carbonate (PC), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), acetone, and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone
(NMP) were used without further purification. For the large-batch synthesis of ZIF-8,
313.6 g of 2-MIM and 0.224 g of CTAB were dissolved in 1.4 L of DI water, while 84
g of zinc acetate dihydrate was dissolved in 1.4 L of DI water. The linker solution
was added to the Zn precursor solution over 30, 120, or 240 min under continuous stirring.
The resulting samples were denoted ZIF-8 (DW-30), ZIF-8 (DW-120), and ZIF-8 (DW-240),
respectively. After feeding was complete, the suspensions were aged for 2 h at room
temperature, collected by centrifugation, washed three times with DI water, and dried
at 90 °C overnight. Cu/Zn MOF was synthesized using the optimized 30 min precursor
feeding condition. A linker solution containing 313.6 g of 2-MIM and 0.224 g of CTAB
was prepared in 1.4 L of DI water. Separately, 84 g of zinc acetate dihydrate and
7.7 g of copper acetate monohydrate were dissolved in 1.4 L of DI water to prepare
the mixed-metal precursor solution, corresponding to a Zn/Cu molar ratio of approximately
10:1. This ratio was selected as a moderate Cu incorporation level to preserve the
characteristic ZIF framework while introducing Cu-derived metal sites, based on previous
reports on Cu-doped ZIF-8[18-
20]. The linker solution was added to the mixed-metal precursor solution over 30 min
under continuous stirring. After feeding was complete, the suspension was aged for
2 h at room temperature, centrifuged, washed three times with DI water, and dried
at 90 °C overnight.
2.2. Preparation of activated MOF separators and LFP cathodes
For separator fabrication, 3.0 g of MOF powder was mixed with 17.9 g of a 6.3 wt%
PVDF solution in NMP, corresponding to a MOF/PVDF weight ratio of approximately 2.7:1.
The resulting slurry was doctor-blade cast using a 70 μm gap and dried at 60 °C overnight
to form a freestanding separator. The dried separators had a thickness of approximately
50 μm and were punched into 18 mm-diameter disks before cell assembly. A 1 M LiTFSI/PC
electrolyte was prepared in an Ar-filled glove box. The ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF separators
were then wetted with the electrolyte and electrochemically activated in Li||separator||Li
symmetric cells at 0.5 mA cm-2 for 20 cycles. Twenty activation cycles were used as a conditioning period because
the polarization evolved during the initial cycles and subsequently approached a relatively
stable response. After activation, the separators were recovered in the glove box,
and excess surface electrolyte was removed. The separator masses were measured before
activation (mdry) and after activation (mact). The retained liquid electrolyte was calculated as (mact – mdry)/(mact) × 100. LFP cathodes were prepared by mixing LiFePO4, acetylene black, and PVDF at a weight ratio of 8:1:1 in NMP. The slurry was ball-milled
for 1 h, cast onto carbon-coated Al foil, and vacuum-dried at 110 °C for 10–12 h.
The electrodes were punched into 14 mm disks with an active-material loading of approximately
3.2 mg cm-2.
2.3. Physicochemical characterization
The crystal structures of the MOF powders and separators before and after activation
were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 ADVANCE, Bruker) using Cu Kα radiation
($\lambda = 1.54\text{ \AA}$) over 5°–40° at a scan rate of 5° min-1. Morphologies were examined by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM,
SU7000, Hitachi) at 10 kV. N2 adsorption–desorption measurements were performed using a surface area analyzer (ASAP
2020, Micromeritics). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was used to
compare pristine and activated MOF separators.
2.4. Cell assembly and electrochemical measurements
All CR2032 cells were assembled in an Ar-filled glove box. Linear sweep voltammetry
(LSV) was performed using Li||separator||stainless-steel cells from 3.0 to 6.0 V at
1 mV s-1. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was conducted using stainless-steel||separator||stainless-steel
cells over 1 Hz–10 MHz. Ionic conductivity was calculated as $\sigma = L/(RA)$, where
L, R, and A are the separator thickness, bulk resistance, and electrode area, respectively.
Stepwise current-density tests were performed in Li||Li symmetric cells by sequentially
increasing the current density through 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7,
and 2.0 mA cm-2 for both the ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF separators. Long-term Li plating/stripping was conducted
at 0.5 mA cm-2 and 0.5 mAh cm-2. Li||LFP cells employing activated ZIF-8 or Cu/Zn MOF separators were cycled between
2.0 and 4.2 V at 1 C and room temperature. For comparison, control Li||LFP cells were
assembled using ZIF-8 or Cu/Zn MOF separators that were statically soaked in the same
LiTFSI/PC electrolyte for approximately 44 h, matching the duration of the 20-cycle
electrochemical activation, without applied current.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
To understand how the nucleation rate governs crystal quality in large-batch synthesis,
the precursor feeding conditions were systematically controlled to modulate the nucleation
rate of ZIF-8. As illustrated in Figure 1a, the linker solution was fed into the Zn precursor solution over 30, 120, or 240
min, yielding ZIF-8 (DW-30), ZIF-8 (DW-120), and ZIF-8 (DW-240), respectively. The
XRD patterns (Figure 1b) show that the synthesized ZIF-8 samples exhibit diffraction patterns consistent
with the standard ZIF-8 pattern (JCPDS No. 062-1030), with characteristic reflections
corresponding to the (011), (002), (112), (022), (013), and (222) planes[12-
14]. The intense low-angle (011) reflection at approximately 7.3–7.4° is a representative
diffraction feature of the crystalline ZIF-8 framework[12,
13,
21]. In particular, ZIF-8 (DW-30) exhibited sharper and better-resolved reflections than
ZIF-8 (DW-240), indicating the formation of a more highly ordered crystalline structure
under the shorter feeding condition. In contrast, ZIF-8 (DW-240) exhibited relatively
broad and poorly defined diffraction peaks. The SEM images (Figure 1c) further support this structural evolution. ZIF-8 (DW-240) and ZIF-8 (DW-120) consisted
of irregular particles with poorly developed crystal facets, whereas ZIF-8 (DW-30)
formed well-defined polyhedral particles with a more uniform morphology. SEM-based
particle-size analysis yielded average particle sizes of 450 ± 45, 311 ± 61, and 343
± 71 nm for ZIF-8 (DW-30), ZIF-8 (DW-120), and ZIF-8 (DW-240), respectively. The smaller
standard deviation of ZIF-8 (DW-30) further indicates a narrower particle-size distribution
under the shorter feeding condition. It is noteworthy that a more uniform MOF particle
morphology can be beneficial for electrochemical performance, as previous studies
have shown that controlled particle size and morphology promote more homogeneous ion-transport
pathways and reduce transport heterogeneity in MOF-based battery systems[22-
24]. This behavior is likely because a short feeding time promotes rapid nucleation,
allowing the resulting nuclei to undergo a more uniform growth process and thereby
producing more uniform and well-faceted ZIF-8 crystals[13-
17]. Overall, the combined XRD and SEM results indicate that controlling the precursor
feeding time is critical for recovering the characteristic crystallinity and morphology
of ZIF-8 during large-batch aqueous synthesis.
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic representation of the large-batch aqueous synthesis of ZIF-8
and Cu/Zn MOF. (b) XRD patterns of the synthesized ZIF-8 samples and standard JCPDS
card of ZIF-8. (c) SEM images of ZIF-8 prepared with different precursor feeding times.
ZIF-8 (DW-30), ZIF-8 (DW-120), and ZIF-8 (DW-240) denote samples synthesized with
dropwise feeding times of 30, 120, and 240 min, respectively.
Based on the understanding of nucleation behavior established for large-batch ZIF-8
synthesis, the optimized aqueous synthesis strategy was further extended to Cu/Zn
MOF to examine its broad applicability. The XRD pattern of the Cu/Zn MOF closely matched
the standard reference pattern (Figure 2a)[7]. Consistent with this result, the corresponding SEM images revealed uniform, well-defined
faceted particles with an average size of approximately 510 nm (Figure 2b). The relatively uniform particle size and well-developed crystal facets can be attributed
to the controlled precursor feeding condition, which likely promotes rapid nucleation
and a more uniform subsequent crystal-growth process[16,
17]. These results indicate that the optimized synthesis condition established for ZIF-8
can also be applied to Cu/Zn MOF while preserving its characteristic crystalline structure
and morphology. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF showed the characteristic
low-pressure uptake of microporous materials, with Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific
surface areas of 1503 and 1402 m2 g-1, respectively (Figures 2c and 2d). These high specific surface areas primarily originate from the preserved microporous
frameworks of the ZIF-based structures[25]. These results indicate that the optimized aqueous synthesis maintained the characteristic
porous structures of both MOFs.
Fig. 2. (a) XRD pattern and (b) SEM images of Cu/Zn MOF synthesized using the optimized
large-batch aqueous process. (c-d) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of (c) ZIF-8 and (d) Cu/Zn MOF.
To evaluate whether the high-quality MOFs obtained through large-batch aqueous synthesis
retained the functionality required for MOF-based semi-solid-state electrolytes, the
synthesized MOFs were fabricated into separators and electrochemically activated with
a LiTFSI/PC electrolyte. The surface and cross-sectional SEM images (Figures 3a and 3b) show densely packed MOF particles forming continuous separator structures with thicknesses
of approximately 50 μm for both the ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF separators. The top-view images
further reveal relatively uniform and continuous particle packing without obvious
macroscopic defects, indicating successful fabrication of the large-batch MOFs into
compact separator structures. To determine whether the porous MOF frameworks effectively
accommodated the electrolyte during activation, XRD patterns were compared before
and after electrochemical activation. After activation, the characteristic XRD peak
positions of both ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF remained largely unchanged, whereas the intensities
of the low-angle characteristic peaks decreased noticeably (Figures 3c and 3d). In particular, the decrease in the low-angle (011) reflection is consistent with
electrolyte incorporation into the MOF pores, which alters the electron-density contrast
and consequently the scattering intensity within the porous framework[7]. At the same time, the preservation of the characteristic peak positions indicates
that the crystalline MOF frameworks were maintained during activation. The FT-IR spectra
of the activated separators further showed additional bands associated with Li+–TFSI-, Li+–solvent, and TFSI- species (Figures 3e and 3f), supporting the incorporation and interaction of the LiTFSI/PC electrolyte within
the MOF-based separators[6,
7]. Gravimetric analysis showed retained liquid-electrolyte fractions of approximately
49.2 and 49.1 wt% for the activated ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF separators, respectively,
comparable to the liquid-electrolyte content reported for a ZIF-8-based quasi-solid
electrolyte[4]. Overall, these results indicate that the large-batch MOFs retain both their structural
integrity and electrolyte-hosting functionality after electrochemical activation.
Fig. 3. (a-b) Surface and cross-sectional SEM images of (a) ZIF-8 and (b) Cu/Zn MOF
separators. (c-d) XRD patterns of pristine and activated (c) ZIF-8 and (d) Cu/Zn MOF
separators. (e-f) FT-IR spectra of pristine and activated (e) ZIF-8 and (f) Cu/Zn
MOF separators.
The electrochemical properties of the activated separators were subsequently evaluated
to determine whether the electrolyte-hosting functionality of the large-batch MOFs
could be translated into effective ion transport and Li-metal compatibility. The LSV
curves (Figure 4a) exhibited anodic onset potentials of approximately 4.61, 4.84, and 4.80 V for Celgard
with liquid electrolyte, activated ZIF-8, and activated Cu/Zn MOF, respectively. The
delayed anodic current onset of both MOF-based separators relative to Celgard indicates
improved oxidative stability after electrochemical activation. This behavior can be
attributed to the confined electrolyte environment within the MOF pores, which suppresses
the oxidative decomposition of electrolyte species[6,
7,
26]. The Nyquist plots (Figure 4b) yielded ionic conductivities of $7.98 \times 10^{-5}\text{ S cm}^{-1}$ for ZIF-8
and $1.2 \times 10^{-4}\text{ S cm}^{-1}$ for Cu/Zn MOF, confirming that the large-batch
MOFs retained effective ion-transport capability after activation[27]. The higher ionic conductivity of Cu/Zn MOF can be associated with the additional
unsaturated metal sites introduced by Cu incorporation, which enhance interactions
with TFSI--containing electrolyte species and facilitate Li+ transport through the microporous channels[7,
26]. Long-term Li||Li symmetric-cell cycling at 0.5 mA cm-2 showed stable and reversible Li plating/stripping behavior for 200 h for both ZIF-8
and Cu/Zn MOF separators (Figures 4c and 4d), indicating good compatibility with Li metal. In the stepwise current-density tests
(Figures 4e and 4f), the ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF separators maintained reversible Li plating/stripping up
to 1.5 and 2.0 mA cm-2, respectively. The higher current-density tolerance of the Cu/Zn MOF separator is
consistent with its higher ionic conductivity, which can alleviate ion-transport polarization
under increased current demand. Overall, these results demonstrate that the MOFs prepared
through the large-batch aqueous process retain the electrochemical functionality required
for MOF-based semi-solid-state electrolytes.
Fig. 4. (a) LSV curves of activated ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF separators and Celgard with
liquid electrolyte. (b) Nyquist plots of activated ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF separators.
Long-term Li plating/stripping profiles of Li||Li symmetric cells using (c) ZIF-8
and (d) Cu/Zn MOF separators at 0.5 mA cm-2. Stepwise current-density profiles of Li||Li symmetric cells using (e) ZIF-8 and
(f) Cu/Zn MOF separators.
Based on these stable electrochemical characteristics, the practical applicability
of the activated MOF separators as semi-solid-state electrolytes was further evaluated
in Li||LFP cells. Figure 5 shows the electrochemical performance of Li||LFP cells employing the activated ZIF-8
and Cu/Zn MOF separators, in which the LiTFSI/PC electrolyte incorporated within the
MOF pores provides the ion-conducting phase of the semi-solid electrolyte[6,
7]. The galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles exhibited the characteristic LFP plateaus
at approximately 3.4–3.5 V, and the overall profile shapes were largely maintained
after prolonged cycling (Figures 5a and 5b). The corresponding cycling results show that the ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF-based cells
delivered initial discharge capacities of 122.3 and 130.0 mAh g-1, respectively, and retained capacities above 110 mAh g-1 after 200 cycles at 1 C (Figures 5c and 5d). In addition, the Coulombic efficiencies remained close to 100% throughout cycling,
indicating highly reversible charge–discharge behavior. In contrast, cells assembled
with statically soaked MOF separators without electrochemical activation showed rapid
capacity loss during the initial cycles (Figures 5c and 5d), indicating that simple electrolyte wetting alone was insufficient to achieve the
stable electrochemical behavior observed after activation. The Cu/Zn MOF-based cell
maintained a slightly higher discharge capacity during cycling than the ZIF-8-based
cell, consistent with its higher ionic conductivity observed in the EIS measurements.
The improved ion-transport characteristics of Cu/Zn MOF, associated with Cu-induced
unsaturated metal sites and enhanced electrolyte–framework interactions, can reduce
transport polarization and facilitate Li+ transfer during repeated cycling[7,
26]. Similar stable Li||LFP operation has previously been demonstrated for laboratory-scale
MOF-based semi-solid electrolytes, supporting the suitability of these ZIF-based frameworks
as electrolyte hosts[4,
5,
7].
Fig. 5. (a-b) Galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles of Li||LFP cells using activated
(a) ZIF-8 and (b) Cu/Zn MOF separators for 200 cycles at 1 C and room temperature.
(c-d) Cycling performance and Coulombic efficiency of Li||LFP cells using (c) ZIF-8
and (d) Cu/Zn MOF separators at 1 C and room temperature; cells using statically soaked
separators without electrochemical activation are included for comparison.
Because the present separator thickness (50 μm) limits cell-level energy density,
further thickness reduction while preserving separator integrity and ion transport
is essential; optimization of key processing parameters, such as binder content, slurry
viscosity, casting speed, and drying time and temperature, is the subject of ongoing
work. Overall, these results indicate that the large-batch aqueous synthesis preserves
not only the crystalline and porous characteristics of the MOFs but also their functional
role as semi-solid-state electrolytes in Li-metal batteries.
4. CONCLUSION
In this study, the influence of nucleation and crystal-growth behavior on the large-batch
aqueous synthesis of ZIF-based MOFs was systematically investigated by controlling
the precursor feeding time. Simply increasing the batch size resulted in reduced crystallinity
and irregular particle morphology, whereas shortening the precursor feeding time from
240 to 30 min promoted rapid nucleation and a more uniform subsequent growth process,
recovering the characteristic crystalline structure and well-defined polyhedral morphology
of ZIF-8. Under the optimized condition, ZIF-8 exhibited relatively uniform particles
of approximately 450 nm, and the same synthesis strategy was successfully extended
to Cu/Zn MOF, yielding uniform faceted particles of approximately 510 nm. The large-batch
ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF also retained high BET specific surface areas of 1503 and 1402
m2 g-1, respectively, confirming preservation of their characteristic microporous structures.
After fabrication into separators and electrochemical activation, the decrease in
low-angle XRD intensity together with the appearance of Li+–solvent, Li+–TFSI-, and TFSI--related FT-IR bands confirmed successful incorporation of electrolyte species into
the MOF structures. The activated ZIF-8 and Cu/Zn MOF separators exhibited ionic conductivities
of $7.98 \times 10^{-5}$ and $1.2 \times 10^{-4}\text{ S cm}^{-1}$, respectively,
stable Li plating/stripping behavior for 200 h at 0.5 mA cm-2, and sustained Li||LFP cycling for 200 cycles at 1 C. Taken together, these results
show that the structural characteristics recovered through precursor feeding control
were retained after separator fabrication and translated into effective electrolyte-hosting
and electrochemical functionality. Importantly, the large-batch aqueous products maintained
the key characteristics required for MOF-based semi-solid-state electrolytes, demonstrating
that appropriate control of nucleation and crystal growth can mitigate the structural
deterioration associated with increasing the batch size. This process therefore provides
a practical strategy for extending aqueous synthesis of ZIF-based MOFs toward larger-batch
preparation without substantial loss of their structural and electrochemical functionality.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded
by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00217581 and RS-2024-00447869). This research
was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry
of Education (RS-2025-25430676).
REFERENCES
X.-B. Cheng, R. Zhang, C.-Z. Zhao, Q. Zhang,
Chem. Rev. 117, 10403 (2017).

J. Liu, Z. Bao, Y. Cui, E. J. Dufek, J. B. Goodenough, P. Khalifah, Q. Li, B. Y. Liaw,
P. Liu, A. Manthiram, Y. S. Meng, V. R. Subramanian, M. F. Toney, V. V. Viswanathan,
M. S. Whittingham, J. Xiao, W. Xu, J. Yang, X.-Q. Yang, J.-G. Zhang,
Nat. Energy 4, 180 (2019).

S. Bai, Y. Sun, J. Yi, Y. He, Y. Qiao, H. Zhou,
Joule 2, 2117 (2018).

C. Sun, J.-H. Zhang, X.-F. Yuan, J.-N. Duan, S.-W. Deng, J.-M. Fan, J.-K. Chang, M.-S.
Zheng, Q.-F. Dong,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 46671 (2019).

X. Qi, D. Cai, X. Wang, X. Xia, C. Gu, J. Tu,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 6859 (2022).

Z. Chang, H. Yang, X. Zhu, P. He, H. Zhou,
Nat. Commun. 13, 1510 (2022).

M. H. Nguyen, N. M. Ngo, B.-K. Kim, S. Park,
Adv. Sci. 11, 2407018 (2024).

M. H. Nguyen, C. Niu, N. M. Ngo, J. Chen, S. Park,
Energy Mater. 5, 500093 (2025).

M. Rubio-Martinez, C. Avci-Camur, A. W. Thornton, I. Imaz, D. Maspoch, M. R. Hill,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3453 (2017).

J. Ren, X. Dyosiba, N. M. Musyoka, H. W. Langmi, M. Mathe, S. Liao,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 352, 187 (2017).

K. Pobłocki, J. Drzeżdżon, B. Gawdzik, D. Jacewicz,
Green Chem. 24, 9402 (2022).

M. Jian, B. Liu, R. Liu, J. Qu, H. Wang, X. Zhang,
RSC Adv. 5, 48433 (2015).

D. Kim, J. Park, J. Park, J. Jang, M. Han, S.-H. Lim, D. Y. Ryu, J. You, W. Zhu, Y.
Yamauchi, J. Kim,
Small Methods 8, 2400236 (2024).

J. Troyano, A. Carné-Sánchez, C. Avci, I. Imaz, D. Maspoch,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 5534 (2019).

P. Y. Moh, M. Brenda, M. W. Anderson, M. P. Attfield,
CrystEngComm 15, 9672 (2013).

X. Lan, N. Huang, J. Wang, T. Wang,
Chem. Commun. 54, 584 (2018).

D. Saliba, M. Ammar, M. Rammal, M. Al-Ghoul, M. Hmadeh,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 1812 (2018).

A. Schejn, A. Aboulaich, L. Balan, V. Falk, J. Lalevée, G. Medjahdi, L. Aranda, K.
Mozet, R. Schneider,
Catal. Sci. Technol. 5, 1829 (2015).

R. Razaq, M. M. U. Din, D. R. Småbråten, V. Eyupoglu, S. Janakiram, T. O. Sunde, N.
Allahgoli, D. Rettenwander, L. Deng,
Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2302897 (2024).

N. M. Ngo, M. H. Nguyen, S.-W. Song, S. Park,
Mater. Lett. 382, 137835 (2025).

Y. Pan, D. Heryadi, F. Zhou, L. Zhao, G. Lestari, H. Su, Z. Lai,
CrystEngComm 13, 6937 (2011).

R. Liu, X. Lai, J. Xue, H. Chen, L. Xie, Y. Qiu, W. Yin,
Polymers 15, 4716 (2023).

H. Seo, Y. Lee, H. Kim, S. Jang, J. H. Kim, J. Kang, H. Eom, O. Kwon, J. Shin, J.
Park, S. Choi, Y. Bae, C. W. Park, M.-L. Seol, H. Song, S. Park, I. Nam,
J. Alloys Compd. 1013, 178578 (2025).

K. Chen, M. Lu, X. Li, S. Yang, R. Bagherzadeh, F. Lai, C. Zhang, Y.-E. Miao, T. Liu,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17, 39064 (2025).

J. H. Kim, Y. Lee, C. An, S. Yi, J. H. Kim,
Korean J. Met. Mater. 62, 713 (2024).

C. Zhang, X. Li, H. Wu, J. Xu, Z. Qu, F. Sun, Y. Tian, F. Li, L. Shen, Y. Lu,
ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 5, 5519 (2022).

I. T. Kim, S. J. Lee, S. H. Park, S. H. Lee, M. S. Chae, H. J. Park, C. Kim, W.-J.
Lee, Y. S. Park,
Korean J. Met. Mater. 63, 913 (2025).
