The Journal of
the Korean Journal of Metals and Materials

The Journal of
the Korean Journal of Metals and Materials

Monthly
  • pISSN : 1738-8228
  • eISSN : 2288-8241

Editorial Office


  1. (Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju 52851, Republic of Korea)
  2. (School of Materials Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea)
  3. (Home Appliance & Air Solution, LG Electronics 3, Seoul 08594, Republic of Korea)



Antibacterial activity, Glass structure, Molecular Dynamics simulation, Oxyfluoride glass

1. INTRODUCTION

Glass powders are indispensable materials in modern society and are widely used across various industries due to their chemical durability, thermal stability, and compositional flexibility[1- 3]. Humans are frequently exposed daily to environments containing bacteria, fungi, and viruses, posing potential risks to human health[4]. To address these concerns, increasing attention has been directed toward developing glass materials with antimicrobial and antiviral functionalities aimed at mitigating biological contamination. Therefore, recent research and industrial efforts have focused on enhancing the biological performance of glass and glass-ceramics to reduce their associated health risk. In particular, antibacterial glass powders have found growing applications in pharmaceutical packaging, healthcare, and the food industry, where their ability to inhibit microbial growth is highly valued[5].

Antibacterial glass is a specialized glass designed to inhibit bacterial adhesion and proliferation on surfaces, thereby reducing the risks of infection and cross-contamination. The increasing prevalence of infectious diseases and biological contamination has driven a strong demand for glass materials with inherent antimicrobial activity, promoting extensive technological and product development worldwide[6- 9]. Silver (Ag) has been extensively investigated and applied in biomaterials owing to its strong, broad-spectrum antibacterial activity; however, its potential cytotoxicity, high production cost, and environmental concerns have restricted its widespread use in biomedical and consumer glass products[10]. In contrast, zinc (Zn) has emerged as a promising alternative owing to its biocompatibility, environmental safety, and cost-effectiveness. Zn2+ ions have demonstrated potent antibacterial performance, including efficacy against super bacteria[10- 13]. Zinc-containing glasses exhibit notable antibacterial performance against both Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), which are major pathogens responsible for healthcare-associated infections, particularly in vulnerable populations[14, 15]. Despite these advantages, the incorporation of Zn into antibacterial glass through conventional melting has been relatively underexplored, and its structural and functional roles remain insufficiently understood. In Zn-based antibacterial glass systems, a relatively high ZnO content is generally required to achieve effective antibacterial performance. However, excessive incorporation of ZnO increases the risk of crystallization during melting, which restricts glass-forming ability[16, 17]. Therefore, clarifying the correlation between ZnO content, glass structure, and ion-release behavior is crucial for optimizing the antibacterial performance and structural stability of zinc-containing glass systems.

Borate-based glasses have recently attracted attention as promising antibacterial and bioactive materials due to their unique structural flexibility, controllable degradation, and strong ability to release antibacterial ions. Numerous studies have reported the development of novel borate-based glass systems, emphasizing their potential in biomedical applications such as tissue regeneration, wound healing, and infection control[18- 22]. Compared with conventional silicate glasses, borate and borosilicate glasses exhibit more controllable degradation and sintering behaviors, allowing precise modulation of dissolution rates and bioactivity[21]. The structural and functional behavior of borate-based glasses is strongly composition-dependent and can be tailored via the incorporation of various oxide additives. The introduction of network-modifying oxides, such as CaO and Na2O, influences dissolution rate, viscosity, and thermal expansion of borate glasses, thereby enabling control over biological and mechanical performance[23- 29]. Among these borate-based systems, zinc borate glasses have recently gained increasing attention as multifunctional materials that combine the bioactivity of borate networks with the antibacterial properties of zinc ions[30- 32]. Although precise compositional control during melting can be challenging, the resultant glass systems still offer adjustable degradation behavior, enabling the modulation of Zn2+ ion release. This controllable ion release is closely associated with the material’s antibacterial efficacy and biocompatibility[30, 31]. Consequently, zinc borate glasses are regarded as promising candidates for biomedical coatings, wound dressings, and antibacterial fillers.

Several studies have demonstrated that the incorporation of CaF2 into borate or silicate glass systems alters the local glass network structure by forming non-bridging fluorine species such as B-F or Si-F linkages[33, 34]. The introduction of fluorine partially replaces the bridging oxygen bonds, weakening the network, resulting in a more open and depolymerized structure. This structural modification facilitates the migration and release of antibacterial cations (e.g., Zn2+, Cu2+, and Ag+), thereby enhancing ion exchange and dissolution kinetics[33, 34]. Consistent with these findings, studies on fluoroborate and oxyfluoride glass systems have revealed that increasing the fluoride content widens the interstitial gaps within the B-O network and promotes ionic mobility due to the reduced cross-linking density[33- 35]. Moreover, Pedone et al. reported that fluoride incorporation modifies the local ionic environment, influencing both chemical durability and reactivity[36].

Effective antibacterial performance in glass systems depends on the precise control of several key factors, including the ion release behavior, glass network structure, and surface charge (zeta potential). The zeta potential of a glass surface plays a critical role in bacterial adhesion and interaction. Previous studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between zeta potential and antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus, indicating that more positively charged surfaces tend to exhibit stronger antibacterial efficacy[37, 38]. In alkali-containing glass systems, the surface charge is strongly influenced by the adsorption of modifier cations under alkaline conditions, where charge reversal can occur due to overcompensation of negative surface sites[39]. For instance, in CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 and ZnO-Na2O-B2O3-SiO2 glass systems, higher CaO content or increased surface ion elution enhances the zeta potential, promoting electrostatic attraction between the positively charged glass surface and negatively charged bacterial membranes[37, 40]. Fluorine incorporation into oxide glass matrices has also been shown to modify surface chemistry and zeta potential by substituting hydroxyl (OH-) groups with fluoride (F-) ions[41]. This substitution, facilitated by the comparable ionic radii of F- and OH-, can reduce the density of surface hydroxyl species and modify the surface potential toward more positive values. Previous studies further suggest that F-/OH- exchange at the glass-solution interface and accumulation of modifier cations (e.g., Ca2+, Zn2+) can collectively influence the surface charge distribution and interfacial reactivity[42]. Consequently, fluoride addition has been proposed to enhance antibacterial activity indirectly by strengthening electrostatic interactions with bacterial cell walls and by facilitating ion release[37- 42]. However, despite these insights, the mechanistic relationship between fluorine incorporation, zeta potential modification, and antibacterial performance remains insufficiently understood. A molecular-level understanding of how fluorine alters glass structure and surface electrostatics is therefore essential for optimizing the antibacterial functionality of zinc borate glasses.

Classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have emerged as a powerful tool for elucidating atomic-scale structure-property relationships in glassy materials. Unlike crystalline solids, glasses exhibit intrinsically disordered networks that lack long-range periodicity, limiting the structural information obtained using conventional diffraction techniques. MD simulations overcome this limitation by providing detailed insights into the short- and medium-range atomic arrangements, offering a microscopic understanding of the glass network topology that is often inaccessible through experiments alone. When combined with experimental analyses, MD simulations enable cross-validation between theoretical predictions and empirical observations, thereby deepening the understanding of the structural dynamics and property evolution in complex glass systems[43, 44].

Several MD simulation studies have been conducted to elucidate the structural characteristics of bioactive glasses; however, fluorine-containing multi-component systems have been comparatively less investigated[45- 49]. Recent progress has been made toward developing potential parameters derived from fluorine-doped crystalline phases, enabling more accurate simulations of fluorine-containing oxyfluoride glasses[35, 49- 53]. Understanding the structural role of fluorine in such systems is particularly important, as it directly influences the glass network configuration and ion transport behavior. For instance, Lusvardi et al. investigated the substitution of CaO with CaF2 in a high-silica-content SiO2-Na2O-CaO-P2O5 glass system, revealing the influence of fluorine on the glass structure and connectivity[49]. Nevertheless, borate-rich systems such as ZnO-B2O3-SiO2-CaO glasses have received limited attention, where the substitution of CaO with CaF2 and its correlation with glass dissolution behavior and antibacterial activity remain poorly understood.

In this study, the effect of fluorine incorporation on the structural evolution, ion release behavior, and antibacterial performance of zinc borosilicate glasses was investigated by partially substituting CaO with CaF2. A combined experimental and MD simulation approach was employed to elucidate fluorine-induced structural modifications and establish correlations between local atomic environments, dissolution characteristics, and antibacterial activity. These findings provide new insights into the structural role of fluorine in multi-component bioactive glasses and offer a basis for the rational design of next-generation antibacterial glass systems.

2. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

2.1 Glass Preparation

A series of glasses with compositions of xCaF2-(20-x)CaO-20ZnO-50B2O3-10SiO2 (x = 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mol%) were synthesized to control glass dissolution behavior and to investigate the correlation between the glass structure and antibacterial properties. The chemical compositions of the prepared glasses are listed in Table 1. For convenience, the samples were designated as A 20-00, A 15-05, A 10-10, A 05-15, and A 00-20, corresponding to x = 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mol%, respectively. High-purity reagent-grade powders of ZnO (Sigma Aldrich, 99%), SiO2 (Sigma Aldrich, 99%), B2O3 (Sigma Aldrich, 99.9%), Ca2CO3 (Sigma Aldrich, 99.99%), and CaF2 (Sigma Aldrich, 99%) were used as starting materials. Each batch, weighing approximately 60 g, was mixed in stoichiometric proportions using a 3D mixer for 5 h to ensure homogeneity. The well-mixed powders were melted in 100 mL platinum crucibles at 1150 °C for 1 h in an electric furnace. The molten glass was then poured into a preheated graphite mold at 550 °C, close to the glass transition temperature (Tg). The samples were subsequently annealed at 550 °C for 1h to relieve residual thermal stress, followed by slow cooling to room temperature (23 °C). The obtained glass was crushed and dry-milled in a ball mill at 500 rpm for 2 h. The resulting powders were sieved through a 45 μm mesh to obtain particle sizes below 45 μm.

Table 1. Chemical Composition, Density, and Molar Volume, Packing density and Free volume of xCaF2-(20-x)CaO-20ZnO-50B2O3-10SiO2 (x = 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mol %) glasses.

Abbreviation ZnO (mol%) B2O3 (mol%) SiO2 (mol%) CaO (mol%) CaF2 (mol%) Density (ρ) Molar Volume (Vm) Packing density (Cg) Free volume
A 20-00 20 50 10 20 0 2.72 25.11 0.609 9.8209
A 15-05 20 50 10 15 5 2.68 25.90 0.599 10.3981
A 10-10 20 50 10 10 10 2.66 26.51 0.593 10.7982
A 05-15 20 50 10 5 15 2.61 27.44 0.580 11.5193
A 00-20 20 50 10 0 20 2.59 28.07 0.574 11.9477

2.2 Glass Characterization

The amorphous nature of the prepared glass samples was confirmed using X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Germany). Diffraction patterns were collected continuously over a 2θ range of 10-80°, using Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 30 mA) at a scanning rate of 1.167°/min. The Tg was determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, TG-DSC STS200RV, Hitachi, Japan). Approximately 15-25 mg of powdered sample was placed in an aluminum crucible and heated to 900 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere. The Tg of each sample was measured three times to ensure reproducibility. Glass density was measured using Archimedes method with ethanol (0.788 ± 2.2%) as the immersion medium. Each measurement was repeated ten times to ensure accuracy. Density was calculated using the following equation:

(1)
$\rho_{sample} = \frac{W_{air}}{W_{air} - W_{eth}} \rho_{eth}$

where ρsample and ρeth represent the densities of the glass and ethanol, respectively, and Wair and Weth are the weights of the sample measured in air and ethanol. The measured densities and chemical compositions were used to calculate the molar volume (Vm), using the following equation:

(2)
$V_m = \frac{M}{\rho_{sample}} = \frac{\text{glass molar mass}}{\text{glass density}}$

The atomic packing density Cg was calculated using Equation (3), where Xi is the molar fraction of cation i and Vi is the ionic volume of cation i:

(3)
$C_g = \frac{\rho \sum_i (X_i V_i)}{M}$

The ionic volume Vi was determined using Equation (4), where NA is Avogadro’s number; m and n are the numbers of cations and anion atoms in AmBn, respectively; rA is the ionic radius of the cation; and rB is the ionic radius of anion. The ionic radii were taken from Shannon and Prewitt[54, 55]:

(4)
$V_i = N_A \left(\frac{4\pi}{3}\right) (m r_A^3 + n r_B^3)$

The free volume was calculated using Equation (5) [56]:

(5)
$\text{Free volume} = M_v \times (1 - C_g)$

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were measured using a Perkin-Elmer FTIR 1600 spectrometer in the range of 4000-250 cm-1 at room temperature. To minimize the influence of ambient moisture, the specimens were strictly prepared by mixing 1 mg of the synthesized glass powder with 200 mg of anhydrous KBr and pressing them into pellets. Each spectrum was obtained by averaging 64 scans with a nominal resolution of 4cm−1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was conducted using a surface analysis system (SPECS, Germany) equipped with a Phoibos 150 electron analyzer and monochromatic Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV, 400 W). The C1s peak at 284.6 eV was used as a reference to calibrate the binding energies (BE) of different elements to correct for the charge effect. Spectral fitting was performed with CASA XPS software using Gaussian-Lorentzian (30% Lorentzian) line shapes, and the fits were optimized by minimizing the root-mean-square error. The local structures around silicon and boron were investigated using 29Si and 11B magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS-NMR) spectroscopy. 29Si MAS-NMR spectra were recorded on an 11.7 T spectrometer at a resonance frequency of 99.36 MHz with a spinning rate of 10 kHz. A pulse length of 0.89 µs (π/12) and a recycle delay of 20 s were applied. 3-(Trimethylsilyl) propionic acid sodium salt-d4 was used as the chemical shift reference. 11B MAS-NMR spectra were acquired at 11.7 T with a resonance frequency of 160.46 MHz and a spinning rate of 15 kHz. A pulse length of 1 µs (π/6) and a recycle delay of 3 s were applied. An aqueous solution of H3BO3 was used as the chemical shift reference.

Glass dissolution tests were conducted by immersing each sample in 100 mL of distilled water at 40 °C for 24-168 h. The annealed glass samples used for the tests were cut and polished on both sides to dimensions of 10 x 15 x 1.5 mm. The concentration of the released ions was quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, Agilent 7900). The zeta potential of the glass particles was measured by particle electrophoresis using a Pen Kem System 3000 Electrokinetic Analyzer (Pen Kem Inc., Bedford Hills, New York, USA). Two bulk samples were mounted in the measurement cell, facing each other with a 100 µm gap to allow electrolyte flow. Measurements were performed in 0.001 M KCl solution at pH 7.2, adjusted with 0.05 M NaOH. The zeta potential reflects the effective surface charge of the glass particles, whereas in solution, charge reversal occurs due to cation adsorption at the surface.

Antibacterial activity was evaluated according to the ASTM E2149-10 standard. The bacterial suspensions of E. coli and S. aureus were standardized to 1.5 × 106 CFU/ml using the plate count method. Each glass sample was inoculated with bacterial suspension and agitated on an orbital shaker at 350 rpm for 1 h at 37 °C to promote contact between the glass particles and bacteria. After shaking, aliquots of the bacterial solution were serially diluted with the recovery diluent, and 1 mL of each dilution was plated and incubated for 24 h. Surviving colonies were counted and compared with those of the control (0 h). Antibacterial activity was considered effective when more than 99% of CFUs were devitalized. Antibacterial activity was calculated using the following equation:

(3)
$\text{Antibacterial activity (%)} = \frac{C_{control} - C_{survivor}}{C_{control}} \times 100$

where Ccontrol and Csurvivor represent the bacterial counts in the control and test samples, respectively. The cytotoxicity tests were conducted in accordance with the Water Quality Process Testing Standard (ES 04704.1) established by the Ministry of Environment of Korea. This method evaluates toxicity using Daphina magna by observing survival or growth inhibition rates. The degree of toxicity was quantified using the toxicity unit (TU), defined as:

(4)
$\text{Toxicity unit (TU)} = \frac{C}{EC50}$

where c is the concentration of the test chemical (mg / L), and EC50 is the concentration that causes a 50% biological response (mg / L).

2.3 Simulation Details

In MD simulations, the accuracy of structural modeling critically depends on the selection of interatomic force fields. In this study, classical MD simulations were conducted to construct five structural models for each glass composition using a Born-Mayer-type pairwise potential, expressed as follows:

(5)
$\Phi_{ij}(r) = \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{Z_i Z_j}{r} + D_{ij} \exp\left(-\frac{r}{\rho_{ij}}\right)$

where Φij is the interaction energy of the i and j ions, r is the interatomic distance, Zi and Zj are the effective charges, and Dij and ρij are repulsive constants and softness parameter, respectively. This Born-Mayer-type potential has been widely employed in modeling fluoride-containing glass systems incorporating silicate, calcium, zinc, and borate components owing to its proven reliability in reproducing short-range structural features and ionic interactions. The parameter sets used in this study were adopted from previous studies, which derived them from fluoride-containing crystalline systems and were successfully validated for similar multi-component glass networks[35, 52, 53]. The specific numbers of ions, cell sizes, and partial charges used in the simulations are summarized in Table 2. To ensure charge neutrality within each fundamental simulation cell; the charge of oxygen atoms was adjusted within the range of -1.23 to -1.26. All simulations were performed using the Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator (LAMMPS) package[57]. Initial configurations containing approximately 5,000 atoms were generated randomly within cubic periodic cells consistent with the experimentally measured glass densities. For each composition, three independent configurations were subjected to a melt-quench cycle. The long-range Coulombic interactions were calculated using the Ewald summation method with a precision of 1×10-6, and the equations of motion were integrated using the leapfrog Verlet algorithm with a time step of 1 fs[58, 59]. Each system was initially equilibrated at 300 K for 100 ps under zero pressure, followed by heating to 6000 K, and melting for 100 ps in a canonical (NVT) ensemble. The temperature was maintained for an additional 100 ps to ensure complete melting, then cooled to 300 K at 5 K/ps. Final equilibration was performed in a microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for 100 ps at 300 K. Temperature control during the NVT runs was achieved using a Nosé-Hoover thermostat[60]. For structural analysis, atomic trajectories were recorded every 50 integration steps over the final 60,000 steps of the NVE simulation at 300 K.

Table 2. Numbers of ions, cell size and partial charges used for the MD simulation.

Abbreviation Number of ions Cell size (Å) Partial charges (Z)
Zn B Si Ca O F Total
A 20-00 260 1300 130 260 2730 - 4680 37.8472 Zn +1.5
A 15-05 260 1300 130 260 2665 130 4745 38.2376 B +1.8
A 10-10 260 1300 130 260 2600 260 4810 38.5346 Si +2.4
A 05-15 260 1300 130 260 2535 390 4875 38.9798 Ca +1.6
A 00-20 260 1300 130 260 2470 520 4940 39.2789 F -0.8

* For the cell size, the value represents the length of one side of the simulation cell.

To characterize the structural ordering in the simulated glass systems, both short- and medium-range orders were analyzed. The short-range order was evaluated using coordination number (CN) and bond angle distribution (BAD) analyses, whereas the medium-range order was assessed using Qn distributions. The CN, which represents the number of neighboring atoms within the first coordination shell of a central atom, was determined from atomic pair correlations. BADs were obtained to describe the angular correlations between a central atom and its two nearest neighbors, providing a statistical distribution of the bond angles. The Qn analysis was employed to quantify the degree of network polymerization in structural units such as [SiO4], [BO3], and [BO4], where n represents the number of bridging oxygens (BOs) connected to each network former. The cutoff distances used for CN, BAD, and Qn determinations were selected based on the position of the first minimum in the corresponding pair distribution functions (PDFs).

Mean square displacement (MSD) analyses were performed to investigate atomic mobility and the temperature-dependent diffusion behavior of the glass systems. For each composition, simulations were conducted at 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, and 1800 K to ensure adequate equilibration within the glass-forming region. Each temperature run consisted of 60 ps of NVT equilibration, followed by 200 ps of NVE dynamics with a 1 fs time step. The atomic trajectories obtained from the NVE ensemble were subsequently used to evaluate the MSD. The long-time linear region of the MSD-time curve, where the MSD increased proportionally with time, was used to extract the diffusion coefficients of both the individual atomic species and the overall glass system. The MSD was calculated using Equation (6):

(6)
$\langle r^2(t) \rangle = \frac{1}{N} \langle \sum_{i=1}^N |r_i(t) - r_i(t_0)|^2 \rangle$

where N represents the total number of atoms and ri(t) denotes the position of atom i at time t. To improve statistical reliability, the MSD values were averaged multiple times from the equilibrated NVE ensemble. The diffusion coefficients (D) for each atomic species (Zn, B, Si, and Ca) and the overall system were then determined from the slope of the linear region of the MSD curve using Einstein’s equation:

(7)
$D = \lim_{t\to\infty} \frac{1}{6} \frac{d}{dt} \langle |\Delta r_i(t)|^2 \rangle$

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Thermal and Physical Properties

The synthesized glasses were transparent, and XRD analysis confirmed their fully amorphous nature (Fig. 1a). As summarized in Table 1, the glass density decreases, whereas the molar volume increases with increasing CaF2 content. To further evaluate the structural compactness, the atomic packing density and free volume were calculated. As the CaF2 substitution increases from 0 to 20 mol%, Cg progressively decreases from 0.609 to 0.574, while the free volume expands from 9.82 to 11.95. This trend is primarily attributed to the higher molecular weight of CaF2 (78.07 g/mol) compared to that of CaO and the formation of a more open network structure. The substitution of divalent oxygen (O2-) by monovalent fluorine (F-) disrupts the continuous network linkage, thereby increasing the free volume[61, 62]. As shown in Fig. 1b, the Tg decreases with increasing CaF2 concentration. The observed decrease in Tg was consistent with the increase in molar volume. This topological relaxation is fundamentally driven by a decrease in 3-D network connectivity, primarily associated with the structural conversion of tetrahedral BO4 units into planar BO3 units (as will be detailed in Section 3.2).

Fig. 1. (a) XRD patterns and (b) glass transition temperature variation with CaF2 content of xCaF2-(20-x)CaO-20ZnO-50B2O3-10SiO2 glasses (x = 0-20 mol %).

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig1.png

3.2 Glass Structure Characteristics

Fig. 2a presents the 29Si MAS-NMR spectra, which exhibit a progressive shift toward lower chemical shifts with increasing CaF2 content. Because the highly broadened 29Si signal encompasses five overlapping states (Q0 to Q4), quantitative deconvolution was avoided to prevent mathematical fitting uncertainty. Instead, the structural evolution was reliably evaluated based on the overall peak shifting trend. The spectra indicated a gradual increase in the polymerized Q3 and Q4 species, reflecting enhanced connectivity within the silicate network. In particular, the glass containing 20 mol% CaF2 exhibited a distinct enrichment of Q4 units, suggesting the formation of a more extensively cross-linked Si-O-Si framework. As shown in Fig. 3a, the Si Qn distribution obtained from the MD simulation reveals that low-order units (Q0 and Q1) are nearly absent across all compositions. With increasing CaF2 content, the fraction of Q2 units decreased, while Q3 and Q4 species increased, confirming that CaF2 incorporation suppressed the formation of non-bridging oxygen (NBO) and promoted enhanced network connectivity, consistent with the NMR results.

Fig. 2. (a) 29Si and (b) 11B MAS NMR spectra of A 20-00, A 10-10, and A 00-20 glasses showing increased polymerization with CaF2 addition.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig2.png

Structural rearrangement of the borate network was examined using 11B MAS-NMR and MD simulations. As shown in Fig. 2b, the spectra exhibit a clear peak shift toward higher chemical shift values with increasing CaF2 content. This overall trend indicates an enhanced contribution from trigonal BO3 units, as the relative intensity of the BO3 region increased at the expense of the tetrahedral BO4 region, reflecting a gradual structural conversion upon fluoride incorporation. Furthermore, the specific resonance positions within the BO3 and BO4 envelopes also exhibit noticeable shifts. The shift of the BO4 peak can be attributed to changes in the second coordination sphere, such as an altered distribution of B-O-Si and B-O-B linkages, as the local network evolves. Similarly, the shift of the BO3 peak is likely driven by changes in these second nearest neighbors, as well as a progressive increase in non-ring BO3 structures at the expense of ring-type structural units. This observation is consistent with the MD results, which demonstrate a decrease in the average B-O coordination number from approximately 3.30 to 3.22, and a corresponding increase in the BO3 fraction (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, the O-B-O bond angle distribution shown in Fig. 3c reveals an enhanced intensity near 120° (planar BO3) and a reduced intensity near 109.5° (tetrahedral BO4), confirming the structural transition from the BO4 to BO3 configuration.

Although the overall B-O coordination number decreased, detailed speciation analysis revealed that the borate network became ordered and polymerized. In the CaO-rich glass (A 20-00), the BO3 units were distributed between Q2 and Q3 configurations (Fig. 3d-f). With increasing CaF2 content, the proportion of Q2 species decreased markedly, while the fully polymerized Q3 configuration became dominant, accounting for approximately 60% of the BO3 units in the CaF2-rich glass (A 00-20). Similarly, within the BO4 group, the fraction of fully connected Q4 species exceeded 50% at the highest CaF2 concentration. These results indicate that despite the reduction in the boron CN, the borate network achieved a higher degree of polymerization owing to the effective elimination of NBOs.

A fluorine-induced charge compensation mechanism can rationalize the polymerization of both the silicate and borate networks. Substitution of CaO with CaF2 decreased the overall oxygen content of the glass matrix. Highly electronegative F- ions preferentially coordinate with network-modifying cations (Ca2+ and Zn2+) to form stable [Ca-F] and [Zn-F] bonds[63, 64]. In fluoride-free glass, these cations typically interact with oxygen atoms, generating NBOs and depolymerizing the glass networks. However, when bonded to F-, the modifiers are effectively sequestered, diminishing their ability to disrupt the Si-O-Si and B-O-B frameworks.

Fig. 3. (a) Qn distribution of Si species. (b) Average B-O coordination number and fractions of BO3/BO4 units. (c) O-B-O bond angle distributions (solid line represent BO3 unit bond angles and dotted line represent BO4 unit bond angles). (d-f) Qn distributions of BO3 and BO4 units in A 20-00, A 10-10, and A 00-20 glass compositions from MD simulations.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig3.png

Previous studies have reported that fluoride ions exhibit a strong preference for coordination with network modifiers rather than with network formers[63, 64]. Because F- cannot effectively penetrate the covalent glass network, it tends to form ionic [Ca-F] and [Zn-F] bonds and cluster within modifier-rich regions, rather than being incorporated into the SiO4 or BO4 frameworks[63, 64]. This behavior was also confirmed in the present MD simulations, which revealed an increase in clustering of F- ions around modifier-rich domains with higher CaF2 content. This trend is presented in Fig. 4, which depicts the spatial distributions of oxygen and fluorine atoms in the A 20-00, A 10-10, and A 00-20 glasses. As the CaF2 concentration increased, the regions enriched in modifier cations (Ca2+ and Zn2+) became progressively associated with fluorine atoms, forming distinct fluorine-rich clusters. These fluoride-enriched modifier domains expanded at the expense of the oxygen-rich network, indicating that fluorine segregation intensified with increasing CaF2 content. Consequently, oxygen atoms that would otherwise participate in charge compensation remain available to bridge the network formers (Si and B), thereby facilitating the formation of BOs. Thus, despite the overall reduction in the oxygen content, fluorine incorporation suppressed NBO generation and stabilized the highly polymerized structural units, such as Q4(Si), Q3(B), and Q4(B).

Fig. 4. Cross-sectional images showing the spatial distribution of oxygen (blue) and fluorine (pink) in (a) A 20-00, (b) A 10-10, and (c) A 00-20 glasses, highlighting F-rich clustering near modifier-rich domains.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig4.png

The interaction mechanism between fluorine and the modifier cations was further elucidated using MD simulations and XPS analyses. As shown in Fig. 5a, the Zn-O CN decreased sharply from 5.15 to less than unity with increasing CaF2 content. In contrast, the Zn-F CN increased significantly, accounting for approximately 85.8% of the total coordination in the A 00-20 glass. A similar but less pronounced trend was observed for calcium (Fig. 5b), where the Ca-F coordination contribution reached 30.4% at 20 mol% CaF2. The stronger affinity of fluorine for Zn2+ ions compared to that for Ca2+ ions can be attributed to the difference in their ionic field strengths, defined by the charge-to-radius ratio (Z/r2). The smaller ionic radius and higher field strength of Zn2+ enhance its electrostatic attraction to F-, leading to the preferential formation of Zn-F bonds. In both cases, the total CN increases with fluorine addition, from 5.15 to 7.01 for Zn and from 8.21 to 9.24 for Ca, indicating a denser local packing environment facilitated by the smaller ionic radius of F- relative to O2-.

Fig. 5. MD-derived coordination numbers of (a) Zn-O and Zn-F pairs, and (b) Ca-O and Ca-F pairs in xCaF2-(20-x)CaO-20ZnO-50B2O3-10SiO2 glasses (x = 0-20 mol %).

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig5.png

These findings are corroborated by the XPS F 1s spectrum of the A 00-20 sample (Fig. 6a), which shows a dominant peak at 684.5 - 685 eV corresponding to ionic Ca-F and Zn-F bonds. The absence of a higher binding energy (~ 688 eV) indicates that fluorine does not form covalent Si-F or B-F bonds, confirming its selective interaction with modifier cations rather than with network formers. Furthermore, the XPS O 1s spectra (Fig. 6b) exhibit a shift toward lower binding energies with increasing CaF2 content, reflecting a redistribution of the electron density around the oxygen atoms. As Ca2+ and Zn2+ are sequestered by fluorine, the population of NBOs associated with these cations decreases, whereas the remaining oxygen preferentially forms BOs within the silicate and borate frameworks. These results were consistent with the enhanced network polymerization inferred from NMR and MD.

Fig. 6. (a) XPS F 1s spectrum of A 00-20 glass showing ionic Ca-F and Zn-F bonds. (b) XPS O 1s spectra of A 20-00, A 10-10, and A 00-20 glasses.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig6.png

Overall, these results revealed a distinct structural duality characterized by local network polymerization within a globally expanded glass matrix. At the local scale, the preferential coordination of fluorine with modifier cations limits their interaction with the glass network, thereby enhancing the polymerization of both the silicate and borate networks. The increased fractions of the Q4(Si), Q3(B), and Q4(B) species confirmed the reduction in NBOs and the formation of more interconnected local structures. In contrast, from a global topological perspective, substituting oxygens with fluoride interrupts the long-range order (IRO) of the glass matrix. In fluoride-free oxide glasses, divalent modifying cations govern the network topology by acting as ionic cross-linkers, electrostatically bridging multiple NBOs across adjacent silicate and borate segments. However, the preferential coordination of highly electronegative F- ions to these modifiers leads to the formation of monovalent terminal complexes[63]. Because F- acts as a monovalent, non-bridging ligand, it occupies the primary coordination sphere of the modifiers and partially neutralizes their formal charge. This structural sequestration effectively screens the electrostatic field strength of the cations, diminishing their capacity to cross-link multiple network chains. Consequently, while the network-forming structural units may undergo local polymerized, the overall glass network experiences a substantial reduction in ionic cross-linking density and cohesive energy. This decoupling of the modifier and network-former domains leads to a topologically relaxed, more open network structure, which is macroscopically evidenced by the increase in molar volume and the reduction in Tg. As illustrated in Fig 7a-c, the borate and silicate network linkages further depict this structural evolution, revealing that the overall glass framework became progressively more open and spatially expanded with increasing CaF2 content. To clearly visualize the spatial expansion and topological openness of the primary network-forming backbone (SiO4, BO3, and BO4), modifier cations and fluorine atoms were intentionally omitted from this visualization. Because these modifiers tend to form localized clusters within the glass network, as discussed in Fig. 4, including them would visually obscure the covalent glass network.

Fig. 7. MD simulated atomic configurations of (a) A 20-00, (b) A 10-10, and (c) A 00-20 glasses. SiO4 tetrahedra shown in blue; BO3/BO4 units in cyan.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig7.png

3.3 Ion Release Measurements

Fig. 8a-e shows the temperature-dependent diffusion coefficients of the B, Si, Ca, and Zn ions, as well as the overall glass system, obtained from the MD simulations. The diffusivities of the B and Si ions decreased with increasing CaF2 content, consistent with the structural characteristics discussed in Section 3.2. The suppression of NBO formation enhances the local connectivity of the silicate and borate frameworks, thereby restricting the long-range motion of the network-forming cations. This reduced mobility correlates with the increased fractions of Q3 and Q4 species identified by both NMR and MD analyses, confirming that fluoride incorporation strengthens local network polymerization.

In contrast, the diffusivities of Ca2+ and Zn2+ increase with CaF2 addition, reflecting changes in the local coordination environment of the modifier cations rather than alterations in the Si/B network connectivity. Structural and XPS analyses revealed that highly electronegative fluorine preferentially coordinates with these modifier cations, forming stable [Ca-F] and [Zn-F] bonds. Although these bonds reflect a strong local chemical affinity, the single-bond nature of fluorine locally perturbs the 3D connectivity of the surrounding glass matrix. As Zheng et al. recently demonstrated by atom-probe tomography (APT) and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations in fluorinated glasses, this fluorine-induced perturbation promotes atomic clustering and creates percolated diffusion channels within the structure[65]. Consequently, the expanded free volume and altered coordination within these loosely packed, fluorine-rich pathways facilitate the migration of Ca2+ and Zn2+, enhancing their availability for ion exchange during dissolution.

The ICP-MS results shown in Fig. 8f corroborates these findings, indicating a substantial increase in the concentrations of released Ca2+ and Zn2+ ions with higher CaF2 substitution. A pronounced rise in release is observed at ≥ 10 mol% CaF2, coinciding with the simulated enhancement of the overall diffusion coefficient. Collectively, these results demonstrate that fluorine incorporation accelerates ionic transport and dissolution kinetics by creating diffusion channels around the network modifiers, despite the concurrent local polymerization of the silicate and borate units.

It is important to note that while the MD-derived diffusion coefficients were calculated at elevated temperatures representing dry bulk self-diffusion, the ICP-MS leaching experiments were conducted in an aqueous solution at 40 °C governed by surface hydration and ion exchange. Due to the inherent time-scale limitations of classical MD simulations, it is physically unfeasible to obtain a statistically meaningful mean square displacement at room temperature. Therefore, elevated temperatures were strictly employed to achieve sufficient atomic mobility. Despite these mechanistic differences, the high-temperature diffusivities serve as crucial dynamical descriptors of the intrinsic glass network. As Chakraborty et al. recently reported for similar fluorine-modified borosilicate systems, the progressive incorporation of fluorine induces the formation of loosely packed, modifier-rich domains that act as preferential pathways for ion migration[62]. This intrinsic structural evolution, as evidenced by the enhanced atomic mobility of modifier cations in our MD simulations, logically translates to the accelerated ion exchange and leaching kinetics observed in the low-temperature aqueous environment. The outward migration of Ca2+ and Zn2+ ions through these percolated diffusion channels governs the early stages of dissolution, enhancing the overall dissolution kinetics and leading to increased Zn2+ availability, which is considered a primary contributing factor for improving antibacterial activity. As shown in Fig. 9, the amount of released F- ions also increases proportionally with CaF2 content, confirming that fluorine remains stably incorporated within the glass network after melting and actively participates in the interfacial leaching processes.

Fig. 8. Temperature-dependent diffusion coefficients of (a) B, (b) Si, (c) Ca, (d) Zn, and (e) the overall system from MD simulations. (f) 24 h Ca2+ and Zn2+ ion concentrations measured by ICP-MS.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig8.png

Fig. 9. 24 h F- ion concentrations of xCaF2-(20-x)CaO-20ZnO-50B2O3-10SiO2 glasses (x = 0-20 mol %) measured by ICP-MS.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig9.png

3.4 FTIR Results and Zeta Potential

As shown in Fig. 10a, the intensity of the OH- stretching band (3400-3500 cm-1) decreases systematically with increasing CaF2 content. This trend is consistent with previous studies reporting reduced molecular water and hydrogen-bonded linkages in the presence of fluoride[66]. Although KBr pellet-based FTIR detects both bulk and surface hydroxyl groups, as well as potential trace moisture, the reduction in the OH- band intensity under identical sample preparation conditions strongly indicates a compositional trend. The substitution of hydroxyl groups by F- ions, facilitated by their comparable ionic radii, reduces the overall concentration of hydroxyl species.

The corresponding change in the surface electrostatic behavior is illustrated by the zeta potential data in Fig. 10b. The magnitude of the zeta potential increases with CaF2 addition, correlating with the reduction in the OH- intensity. This behavior indicates that F- incorporation decreases the density of negatively charged surface sites, thereby shifting the surface potential toward less negative values. This result aligns with the F-/OH- exchange mechanism proposed in Section. 1, suggesting that modifier cation (Ca2+, Zn2+) accumulation may further enhance the surface charge development. The increase in surface charge density has important implications for antibacterial performance. Negatively charged bacterial cell walls are electrostatically repelled by negatively charged glass surfaces, whereas positively charged surfaces disrupt bacterial membranes via electrostatic interactions, leading to cell lysis. Therefore, the observed enhancement in the zeta potential with higher CaF2 content can be directly associated with improved antibacterial efficiency. Additionally, increased zeta potential may improve the dispersion stability of glass particles by minimizing agglomeration and maintaining a uniform charge distribution, facilitating consistent interfacial ion exchange and sustained antibacterial activity[67- 69].

Fig. 10. (a) FTIR spectra showing decreased OH- stretching intensity with increasing CaF2 content. (b) Zeta potential variation of xCaF2-(20-x)CaO-20ZnO-50B2O3-10SiO2 glasses (x = 0-20 mol %).

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig10.png

3.5 Antibacterial Properties and Cytotoxicity Evaluation

Fig. 11 shows the antibacterial activities of the prepared glasses against E. coli and S. aureus. The antibacterial efficiency was evaluated using the R-value, where R = 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0, corresponding to antibacterial activities of 99.0%, 99.9%, and 99.99%, respectively. After 24 h of exposure, all glass samples exhibited antibacterial activity exceeding 99.9 %, demonstrating strong inhibition of both bacterial species. The enhanced antibacterial effect with increasing fluorine substitution correlated with the increased release of Zn2+ ions from the glass network. To further distinguish the compositional effect on antibacterial behavior, an additional 1 h antibacterial assay was conducted. For E. coli, the A 20-00 glass exhibited an antibacterial efficiency of 91.6%, whereas the A 00-20 glass achieved 97.0%. For S. aureus, all glass compositions showed near-complete bacterial inhibition (~ 99.9%), confirming the broad-spectrum antibacterial activity of the fluorine-containing glass series. Overall, these results confirm that all compositions achieved ≥ 99.9% antibacterial efficiency against both E. coli and S. aureus, underscoring their strong potential as antibacterial glass materials.

The cytotoxicity of the glass powders was evaluated using the toxicity unit (TU) approach, in which a TU value ≥ 1.0 indicates high toxicity. In this study, 5 g of each glass sample was dissolved in 1 L of purified water, and the resulting solutions were analyzed. All samples exhibited TU values of approximately 0.9, indicating nontoxicity according to standard criteria. These results indicate that the prepared glasses exhibit excellent antibacterial performance without cytotoxic effects, suggesting their potential applicability as biomedical and antimicrobial coatings.

Fig. 11. Antibacterial activity of xCaF2-(20-x)CaO-20ZnO-50B2O3-10SiO2 glasses (x = 0-20 mol %) against E. coli and S. aureus after 24 h incubation.

../../Resources/kim/KJMM.2026.64.9.808/fig11.png

4. CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the structural evolution and antibacterial performance of xCaF2-(20-x)CaO-20ZnO-50B2O3-10SiO2 (x = 0-20 mol%) glasses were investigated by experimental characterization and MD simulations. The substitution of CaO with CaF2 promotes the polymerization of both the silicate and borate networks, as evidenced by the increased fractions of Q3 and Q4 units in 29Si and 11B MAS NMR spectra and in the MD-derived Qn distributions. Fluorine preferentially associates with the modifier cations to form stable [Ca-F] and [Zn-F] bonds, which sequester these modifiers from the glass network. This interaction suppresses the formation of NBOs and locally stabilizes the glass structure while simultaneously generating modifier-rich domains. Despite this higher degree of local polymerization, both MD simulations and ICP-MS analyses revealed increased diffusivity and leaching of Ca2+ and Zn2+ with increasing CaF2 content. This behavior stems from structural perturbation induced by the single-bond nature of fluorine. Although fluorine forms thermodynamically stable bonds with modifier cations, it promotes atomic clustering and the formation of loosely packed, percolated diffusion channels within the matrix. These expanded pathways facilitate cation migration and enhance dissolution kinetics without compromising the structural integrity of the Si/B network. FTIR and zeta potential analyses further confirmed that fluorine addition suppressed hydroxyl group formation and increased the surface charge, consistent with enhanced ion mobility and interfacial activity.

The improved release of antibacterial Zn2+ ions strongly correlated with superior antibacterial performance, achieving 99.9% bacterial reduction against E. coli and S. aureus after 24 h. Cytotoxicity evaluations (TU < 1) confirmed that all glass compositions were nontoxic, demonstrating their biocompatibility. Overall, these findings elucidate the dual structural role of fluorine in local strengthening and global expansion of the glass network via diffusion channels, thereby coupling enhanced cation mobility with controlled network stability. These insights provide a framework for the design of advanced antibacterial and functional oxide glasses.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was funded by the Two-Year Research Grant from Pusan National University (PNU), Busan, Republic of Korea. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the administrative support from the Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology (KICET).

REFERENCES

1
D. Chen, H. Masui, H. Miyoshi, T. Akai, T. Yazawa, Waste Manag. 26, 1017 (2006).DOI
2
T. Nanba, S. Mikami, T. Imaoka, S. Sakida, Y. Miura, J. Ceram. Soc. Japan 116, 220 (2008).DOI
3
P. A. Bingham, R. J. Hand, O. M. Hannant, S. D. Forder, S. H. Kilcoyne, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 355, 1526 (2009).DOI
4
L. Ciric, Sci. Rep. 12, 8732 (2022).DOI
5
B. Demirel, M. E. Taygun, ACS Omega 8, 18735 (2023).DOI
6
J. S. Fernandes, P. Gentile, R. A. Pires, R. L. Reis, P. V. Hatton, Acta Biomater. 59, 2 (2017).DOI
7
M. Miola, E. Verne, Materials 9, 405 (2016).DOI
8
L. Esteban-Tejeda, F. Malpartida, A. Esteban-Cubillo, C. Pecharromán, J. S. Moya, Nanotechnology 20, 505701 (2009).DOI
9
Garima, S. Sharma, D. Pal, A. Kumar, Antibacterial and Antiviral Functional Materials, p.121, American Chemical Society, Washington DC (2024).DOI
10
R. N. Sinclair, J. A. E. Desa, A. C. Wright, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 72 (1983).DOI
11
L. S. Du, J. F. Stebbins, Chem. Mater. 15, 3913 (2003).DOI
12
L. S. Du, J. F. Stebbins, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 10063 (2003).DOI
13
I. W. Donald, B. L. Metcalfe, R. N. J. Taylor, J. Mater. Sci. 32, 5851 (1997).DOI
14
A. Yasumori, J. Ceram. Soc. Japan 121, 471 (2013).DOI
15
W. Vogel, Glass Chemistry, p.41, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (1985).DOI
16
M. K. Kim, J. S. Lee, I. H. Jung, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 108, e20252 (2025).DOI
17
L. Esteban-Tejeda, C. Prado, B. Cabal, J. Sanz, R. Torrecillas, J. S. Moya, PLoS ONE 10, e0136490 (2015).DOI
18
H. Ryu, J. Lee, J. Seo, H. Kim, K. Hong, D. Kim, J. Lee, D. Lee, B. Chang, C. Lee, S. Chung, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 68, 79 (2004).DOI
19
J. Ning, A. Yao, D. Wang, W. Huang, H. Fu, X. Liu, X. Jiang, X. Zhang, Mater. Lett. 61, 5223 (2007).DOI
20
Ö. H. Andersson, G. Liu, K. Kangasniemi, J. Juhanoja, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 3, 145 (1992).DOI
21
W. Huang, D. E. Day, K. Kittiratanapiboon, M. N. Rahaman, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 17, 583 (2006).DOI
22
D. E. Day, J. E. White, R. F. Brown, K. D. McMenamin, Glass Technol. 44, 75 (2003).Google Search
23
A. Osaka, M. Yuasa, Y. Miura, K. Takahashi, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 100, 409 (1988).DOI
24
C. Rong, K. C. Wong-Moon, H. Li, P. Hrma, H. Cho, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 223, 32 (1998).DOI
25
M. W. G. Lockyer, D. Holland, R. Dupree, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 188, 207 (1995).DOI
26
R. K. Brow, R. J. Kirkpatrick, G. L. Turner, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 919 (1993).DOI
27
N. Kanwal, H. Toms, A. C. Hannon, F. A. Perras, D. L. Bryce, N. Karpukhina, I. Abrahams, J. Mater. Chem. B 3, 8842 (2015).DOI
28
F. Muñoz, L. Montagne, L. Delevoye, A. Durán, L. Pascual, S. Cristol, J. F. Paul, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352, 2958 (2006).DOI
29
E. Ercenk, J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 18, 101810 (2025).DOI
30
J. Bejarano, P. Caviedes, H. Palza, Biomed. Mater. 10, 025001 (2015).DOI
31
V. R. dos Santos, T. M. B. Campos, C. Anselmi, G. P. Thim, M. C. Bottino, A. L. S. Borges, E. Trichês, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 622, 122643 (2023).DOI
32
A. R. Ghazy, B. M. Elmowafy, A. M. Abdelghany, T. M. Meaz, R. Ghazy, R. M. Ramadan, Sci. Rep. 13, 7292 (2023).DOI
33
F. A. Shah, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 58, 1279 (2016).DOI
34
N. F. M. Sahapini, R. Hisam, A. K. Yahya, Appl. Phys. A 128, 223 (2022).DOI
35
J. Chung, K. Kizaki, Y. Nakatsuka, H. Inoue, T. Miyajima, S. Tomeno, J. Phys. Chem. B 127, 3091 (2023).DOI
36
E. Gambuzzi, A. Pedone, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 21645 (2014).DOI
37
S. H. Chang, H. T. V. Lin, G. J. Wu, G. J. Tsai, Carbohydr. Polym. 134, 74 (2015).DOI
38
M. Hwang, B. Ryu, J. Chung, Y. Kim, D. Kim, J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 61, 982 (2024).DOI
39
F. N. S. Raja, T. Worthington, M. A. Isaacs, K. S. Rana, R. A. Martin, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 103, 109868 (2019).DOI
40
S. Palakurthy, P. A. Azeem, K. V. Reddy, J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 59, 76 (2022).DOI
41
D. S. Brauer, N. Karpukhina, M. D. O’Donnell, R. V. Law, R. G. Hill, Acta Biomater. 6, 3275 (2010).DOI
42
I. Kansal, A. Goel, D. U. Tulyaganov, L. F. Santos, J. M. F. Ferreira, J. Mater. Chem. 21, 8074 (2011).DOI
43
J. Du, A. N. Cormack, Atomistic Simulations of Glasses: Fundamentals and Applications, p.1, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2022).DOI
44
C. Chen, C. Zhong, Y. Zhang, A. Li, S. Huang, S. Huang, H. Zeng, Q. Zu, Ceram. Int. 48, 22444 (2022).DOI
45
A. Tilocca, Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 1003 (2009).DOI
46
X. Lu, L. Deng, C. Huntley, M. Ren, P. H. Kuo, T. Thomas, J. Chen, J. Du, J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 2564 (2018).DOI
47
R. Mathew, B. Stevensson, A. Tilocca, M. Edén, J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 833 (2014).DOI
48
M. Sohrabian, M. Vaseghi, S. R. Eslamloo, M. Sameezadeh, B. Arab, F. Moradi, Comput. Mater. Sci. 243, 113098 (2024).DOI
49
G. Lusvardi, G. Malavasi, M. Cortada, L. Menabue, M. C. Menziani, A. Pedone, U. Segre, J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 12730 (2008).DOI
50
S. Hayakawa, C. Ohtsuki, S. Matsumoto, A. Osaka, Y. Miura, Comput. Mater. Sci. 9, 337 (1998).DOI
51
J. Zhao, X. Xu, X. Chen, Q. Xu, Z. Luo, X. Qiao, J. Du, X. Fan, G. Qian, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 39, 5018 (2019).DOI
52
H. Inoue, F. Utsuno, I. Yasui, H. Habuta, A. Makishima, Phys. Chem. Glasses 46, 284 (2005).Google Search
53
H. Inoue, Y. Yanaba, Y. Watanabe, A. Masuno, Phys. Chem. Glasses Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. B 62, 105 (2021).DOI
54
G. A. Rosales-Sosa, A. Masuno, Y. Higo, H. Inoue, Sci. Rep. 6, 23620 (2016).DOI
55
R. D. Shannon, C. T. Prewitt, Acta Crystallogr. B 25, 925 (1969).DOI
56
T. Welter, U. Marzok, J. Deubener, S. Reinsch, R. D. Müller, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 521, 119502 (2019).DOI
57
S. Plimpton, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).DOI
58
P. P. Ewald, Ann. Phys. 369, 253 (1921).DOI
59
W. F. Van Gunsteren, H. J. C. Berendsen, Mol. Simul. 1, 173 (1988).DOI
60
S. Nosé, Mol. Phys. 100, 191 (2002).DOI
61
T. Y. Liu, K. J. Chen, H. Yang, H. I. Hsiang, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 666, 123696 (2025).DOI
62
A. Chakraborty, S. Prasad, I. Tah, A. Jana, S. Kant, S. Tripathy, P. K. Sinha, A. Tarafder, K. Biswas, Ceram. Int. 51, 42734 (2025).DOI
63
D. S. Brauer, N. Karpukhina, R. V. Law, R. G. Hill, J. Mater. Chem. 19, 5629 (2009).DOI
64
J. K. Christie, A. Pedone, M. C. Menziani, A. Tilocca, J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 2038 (2011).DOI
65
W. Zheng, Z. Wang, W. Chen, M. Zhang, H. Li, G. Yang, Q. Xu, X. Qiao, D. Tan, J. Zhang, J. Qiu, G. Qian, X. Fan, Nat. Commun. 15, 8366 (2024).DOI
66
A. Iljina, K. Baltakys, A. Bankauskaite, A. Eisinas, S. Kitrys, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 127, 221 (2017).DOI
67
A. Doostmohammadi, A. Monshi, R. Salehi, M. H. Fathi, Z. Golniya, A. U. Daniels, Ceram. Int. 37, 2311 (2011).DOI
68
H. H. Lu, S. R. Pollack, P. Ducheyne, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51, 80 (2000).DOI
69
A. Bismarck, A. R. Boccaccini, E. Egia-Ajuriagojeaskoa, D. Hülsenberg, T. Leutbecher, J. Mater. Sci. 39, 401 (2004).DOI